H2H data updated: 2026-07-19 02:51 UTC
Cedric Pioline vs Lars Jonsson H2H: 2-0
Cedric Pioline holds a 2–0 lead over Lars Jonsson in their ATP head-to-head. Across 2 main-draw meetings, Cedric Pioline leads 2–0 on clay. Most recently, Cedric Pioline won the 1992 Roland Garros third round 6-2 6-7(2) 6-2 6-2.
Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.
FRA
Age 57
Right-Handed
188 cm / 6'2"
H2H
2
–
0
2 main draw meetings
SWE
Age 56
Right-Handed
188 cm / 6'2"
H2H Match Log
| Date | Tournament | Category | Round | Surface | Winner | Score | Loser | Match |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| May 31, 1992* | Roland Garros | Grand Slam | R32 | Clay | Cedric Pioline | 6-2 6-7(2) 6-2 6-2 | Lars Jonsson | Match data |
| Aug 23, 1990* | San Marino | ATP 250 | R32 | Clay | Cedric Pioline | 5-7 6-3 6-2 | Lars Jonsson | Match data |
* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.
Career Comparison
| Player | Current | Peak | Pts | Elo | W | L | Win % | GS | 1000 | Finals | 500 | 250 | Titles |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Cedric Pioline | #750 | #5 | 2,335 | 1,983 | 370 | 301 | 55.1% | 0 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 4 | 5 |
| Lars Jonsson | #1,320 | #67 | 559 | 1,712 | 86 | 132 | 39.4% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
Career Progression by Age
Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.
| Age | Cedric Pioline | Lars Jonsson | ||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | |
| 17 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1987 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #897 | 1,486 | 0 | 0 |
| 18 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1988 | 2–3 | 40.0% | #452 | 1,497 | 0 | 0 |
| 19 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1989 | 4–5 | 44.4% | #102 | 1,536 | 0 | 0 |
| 20 | 1989 | 0–3 | 0.0% | #202 | 1,483 | 0 | 0 | 1990 | 12–17 | 41.4% | #100 | 1,590 | 0 | 0 |
| 21 | 1990 | 5–12 | 29.4% | #118 | 1,484 | 0 | 0 | 1991 | 21–18 | 53.8% | #78 | 1,673 | 0 | 0 |
| 22 | 1991 | 21–20 | 51.2% | #51 | 1,664 | 0 | 0 | 1992 | 9–23 | 28.1% | #119 | 1,551 | 0 | 0 |
| 23 | 1992 | 31–27 | 53.4% | #33 | 1,845 | 0 | 0 | 1993 | 8–17 | 32.0% | #130 | 1,490 | 0 | 0 |
| 24 | 1993 | 51–27 | 65.4% | #10 | 1,936 | 0 | 0 | 1994 | 19–25 | 43.2% | #102 | 1,567 | 0 | 0 |
| 25 | 1994 | 29–28 | 50.9% | #51 | 1,767 | 0 | 0 | 1995 | 6–10 | 37.5% | #178 | 1,580 | 0 | 0 |
| 26 | 1995 | 24–27 | 47.1% | #54 | 1,760 | 0 | 0 | 1996 | 3–6 | 33.3% | #142 | 1,558 | 0 | 0 |
| 27 | 1996 | 38–21 | 64.4% | #21 | 1,805 | 0 | 1 | 1997 | 2–7 | 22.2% | #276 | 1,502 | 0 | 0 |
| 28 | 1997 | 37–25 | 59.7% | #20 | 1,834 | 0 | 2 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 29 | 1998 | 38–26 | 59.4% | #18 | 1,764 | 0 | 2 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 30 | 1999 | 37–28 | 56.9% | #13 | 1,795 | 0 | 3 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 31 | 2000 | 32–19 | 62.7% | #16 | 1,760 | 0 | 5 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 32 | 2001 | 17–22 | 43.6% | #84 | 1,657 | 0 | 5 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 33 | 2002 | 10–16 | 38.5% | #119 | 1,618 | 0 | 5 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |