H2H data updated: 2026-07-18 02:15 UTC

Cedric Pioline vs Mark Woodforde H2H: 3-2

Cedric Pioline holds a 3–2 lead over Mark Woodforde in their ATP head-to-head. Across 5 main-draw meetings, Mark Woodforde leads 2–0 on hard courts, while Cedric Pioline leads 1–0 on carpet. Most recently, Cedric Pioline won the 1999 Queen's Club third round 6-4 7-5.

FRA Age 57 Right-Handed 188 cm / 6'2"
H2H
3 2
5 main draw meetings
AUS Age 60 Left-Handed 188 cm / 6'2"

H2H Match Log

DateTournamentCategoryRoundSurfaceWinnerScoreLoserMatch
Jun 10, 1999* Queen's Club ATP 250 R32 Grass Cedric Pioline #59 6-4 7-5 Mark Woodforde #56 Match data
Oct 19, 1996* Toulouse ATP 250 QF Hard Mark Woodforde #30 6-4 6-3 Cedric Pioline #17 Match data
Nov 10, 1994* Antwerp ATP 250 R32 Carpet Cedric Pioline #35 7-6(4) 6-3 Mark Woodforde #43 Match data
Apr 14, 1994* Nice ATP 250 R32 Clay Cedric Pioline #10 6-4 7-5 Mark Woodforde #77 Match data
Aug 12, 1993* Cincinnati Masters Masters 1000 R32 Hard Mark Woodforde #25 7-6(4) 6-2 Cedric Pioline #17 Match data

* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.

Career Comparison

Player Current Peak Pts Elo W L Win % GS 1000 Finals 500 250 Titles
Cedric Pioline #750 #5 2,335 1,983 370 301 55.1% 0 1 0 0 4 5
Mark Woodforde #985 #19 1,291 1,922 313 294 51.6% 0 0 0 0 4 4

Career Progression by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.

Age Cedric Pioline Mark Woodforde
YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles
19 1985 6–4 60.0% #127 1,578 0 0
20 1989 0–3 0.0% #202 1,483 0 0 1986 11–14 44.0% #181 1,546 0 1
21 1990 5–12 29.4% #118 1,484 0 0 1987 12–13 48.0% #67 1,648 0 1
22 1991 21–20 51.2% #51 1,664 0 0 1988 31–23 57.4% #42 1,800 0 2
23 1992 31–27 53.4% #33 1,845 0 0 1989 20–15 57.1% #75 1,710 0 3
24 1993 51–27 65.4% #10 1,936 0 0 1990 12–12 50.0% #101 1,716 0 3
25 1994 29–28 50.9% #51 1,767 0 0 1991 12–21 36.4% #88 1,631 0 3
26 1995 24–27 47.1% #54 1,760 0 0 1992 27–23 54.0% #40 1,814 0 3
27 1996 38–21 64.4% #21 1,805 0 1 1993 28–20 58.3% #28 1,792 0 4
28 1997 37–25 59.7% #20 1,834 0 2 1994 29–23 55.8% #43 1,792 0 4
29 1998 38–26 59.4% #18 1,764 0 2 1995 31–25 55.4% #51 1,760 0 4
30 1999 37–28 56.9% #13 1,795 0 3 1996 32–25 56.1% #27 1,800 0 4
31 2000 32–19 62.7% #16 1,760 0 5 1997 24–26 48.0% #46 1,731 0 4
32 2001 17–22 43.6% #84 1,657 0 5 1998 25–24 51.0% #58 1,747 0 4
33 2002 10–16 38.5% #119 1,618 0 5 1999 10–19 34.5% #130 1,611 0 4
34 2000 3–7 30.0% #321 1,584 0 4