H2H data updated: 2026-09-12 00:00 UTC

Cedric Pioline vs Martin Damm Sr H2H: 7-2

Cedric Pioline holds a 7–2 lead over Martin Damm Sr in their ATP head-to-head. Across 9 main-draw meetings, Cedric Pioline leads 3–1 on hard courts, while they are tied 1–1 on carpet. Most recently, Cedric Pioline won the 1999 Wimbledon round of 128 7-6(7) 6-4 6-2.

FRA Age 57 Right-Handed 188 cm / 6'2"
H2H
7 2
9 main-draw meetings

H2H Match Log

PlayerScorePlayerMatch DataDateRoundTournamentCategorySurface
Cedric Pioline #39 7-6(7) 6-4 6-2 Martin Damm Sr Match data Jun 23, 1999* R128 Wimbledon Grand Slam Grass
Cedric Pioline #18 7-6(2) 6-2 Martin Damm Sr Match data Aug 19, 1998* R64 Indianapolis ATP Championship Series modern equivalent ATP 500 Hard
Martin Damm Sr 6-4 3-6 6-2 Cedric Pioline #20 Match data Nov 7, 1996* R32 Moscow World Series modern equivalent ATP 250 Carpet
Cedric Pioline #44 6-1 6-2 Martin Damm Sr Match data Feb 16, 1996* R16 Marseille World Series modern equivalent ATP 250 Hard
Cedric Pioline #18 4-6 7-5 6-3 Martin Damm Sr Match data Aug 25, 1994* R32 Long Island ATP World Series modern equivalent ATP 250 Hard
Cedric Pioline #14 3-6 7-5 6-2 Martin Damm Sr Match data Apr 28, 1994* R32 Munich Open ATP World Series modern equivalent ATP 250 Clay
Martin Damm Sr 7-5 3-6 7-6(6) 6-3 Cedric Pioline #9 Match data Jan 19, 1994* R128 Australian Open Grand Slam Hard
Cedric Pioline #10 7-5 6-2 Martin Damm Sr Match data Oct 23, 1993* QF Montpellier Open ATP World Series modern equivalent ATP 250 Carpet
Cedric Pioline #23 6-4 7-5 3-6 7-5 Martin Damm Sr Match data Jun 23, 1993* R128 Wimbledon Grand Slam Grass

Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable. Arrows show an edition's recorded category and documented modern equivalent; unresolved editions keep their recorded category. Asterisked totals include editions mapped from documented historical predecessor categories. Mapping details.

Career Comparison

Player Current Peak Pts Elo W L Win % GS 1000 including documented historical predecessor categories Finals 500 including documented historical predecessor categories 250 including documented historical predecessor categories Titles
Cedric Pioline #750 #5 2,335 1,984 370 301 55.1% 0 1 0 1 3 5
Martin Damm Sr 1,731 0 0 0 0 0 0

Career Progression by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.

Cedric Pioline Martin Damm Sr
YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles
1989 0–3 0.0% #202 1,482 0 0
1990 5–12 29.4% #118 1,484 0 0
1991 21–20 51.2% #51 1,664 0 0
1992 31–27 53.4% #33 1,848 0 0
1993 51–27 65.4% #10 1,936 0 0
1994 29–28 50.9% #51 1,768 0 0
1995 24–27 47.1% #54 1,761 0 0
1996 38–21 64.4% #21 1,808 0 1
1997 37–25 59.7% #20 1,831 0 2
1998 38–26 59.4% #18 1,765 0 2
1999 37–28 56.9% #13 1,796 0 3
2000 32–19 62.7% #16 1,763 0 5
2001 17–22 43.6% #84 1,658 0 5
2002 10–16 38.5% #119 1,619 0 5

Surface Results by Career Season

Rows are aligned in career order because complete birth data is unavailable. Results cover completed main-draw matches. Bold green marks the higher win percentage when both players have at least 5 matches on that surface at the aligned age.

Cedric Pioline Martin Damm Sr
Yr HardClayGrassCarpet Yr HardClayGrassCarpet
W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win %
1989 0 3 3 0.0% 1989 0 1 1 0.0%
1990 0 1 1 0.0% 5 8 13 38.5% 0 3 3 0.0% 1990 0 1 1 0.0%
1991 6 6 12 50.0% 11 9 20 55.0% 1 1 2 50.0% 3 4 7 42.9% 1991 2 1 3 66.7%
1992 13 10 23 56.5% 9 10 19 47.4% 1 2 3 33.3% 8 5 13 61.5% 1992 6 8 14 42.9% 0 5 5 0.0% 1 1 2 50.0% 1 1 2 50.0%
1993 19 9 28 67.9% 11 8 19 57.9% 8 3 11 72.7% 13 7 20 65.0% 1993 7 11 18 38.9% 1 3 4 25.0% 0 1 1 0.0% 8 6 14 57.1%
1994 15 11 26 57.7% 6 6 12 50.0% 1 3 4 25.0% 7 8 15 46.7% 1994 7 12 19 36.8% 1 3 4 25.0% 3 2 5 60.0% 4 7 11 36.4%
1995 8 10 18 44.4% 6 8 14 42.9% 5 3 8 62.5% 5 6 11 45.5% 1995 7 13 20 35.0% 0 2 2 0.0% 1 1 2 50.0% 7 6 13 53.8%
1996 12 7 19 63.2% 11 5 16 68.8% 3 2 5 60.0% 12 7 19 63.2% 1996 15 13 28 53.6% 0 2 2 0.0% 4 4 8 50.0% 13 10 23 56.5%
1997 10 9 19 52.6% 13 7 20 65.0% 7 3 10 70.0% 7 6 13 53.8% 1997 10 13 23 43.5% 0 3 3 0.0% 3 3 6 50.0% 10 7 17 58.8%
1998 15 13 28 53.6% 12 6 18 66.7% 1 2 3 33.3% 10 5 15 66.7% 1998 10 14 24 41.7% 0 1 1 0.0% 3 3 6 50.0% 6 8 14 42.9%
1999 20 16 36 55.6% 1 6 7 14.3% 12 2 14 85.7% 4 4 8 50.0% 1999 5 9 14 35.7% 1 2 3 33.3% 1 3 4 25.0% 0 2 2 0.0%
2000 16 10 26 61.5% 13 3 16 81.3% 3 3 6 50.0% 0 3 3 0.0% 2000 6 11 17 35.3% 3 3 6 50.0% 5 2 7 71.4% 0 1 1 0.0%
2001 8 11 19 42.1% 7 8 15 46.7% 2 2 4 50.0% 0 1 1 0.0% 2001 0 1 1 0.0% 0 2 2 0.0% 1 4 5 20.0%
2002 4 5 9 44.4% 4 6 10 40.0% 2 3 5 40.0% 0 2 2 0.0% 2002 1 2 3 33.3%
Career 146 118 264 55.3% 109 93 202 54.0% 46 29 75 61.3% 69 61 130 53.1% Career 74 107 181 40.9% 6 28 34 17.6% 22 24 46 47.8% 51 49 100 51.0%

Advanced Statistics Comparison by Career Season

Rows are aligned in career order because complete birth data is unavailable. Metrics use eligible main-draw results; point statistics use matches with detailed data. Bold green marks the stronger value when both underlying samples are sufficient. Lower is better for Schedule because a negative value means a tougher schedule. Career Schedule is normalized per 100 matches.

Cedric Pioline Martin Damm Sr
Yr Elo P+ Serve+ Return+ PD TPW% Hard Elo Clay Elo Grass Elo Set Win % Set Margin Dec. Set Tiebreak Pressure+ Schedule Yr Elo P+ Serve+ Return+ PD TPW% Hard Elo Clay Elo Grass Elo Set Win % Set Margin Dec. Set Tiebreak Pressure+ Schedule
1989 1483 114.0 +7 12.5% -1.88 0–1 -0.41 1989 1492 98.3 0.0% -5.00 -0.08
1990 1484 124.4 +14 +43 34.9% -0.47 4–4 (50%) 2–5 (29%) 100.1 +0.10 1990 1478 98.3 0.0% -2.50 +0.15
1991 1665 135.0 +1.05 -0.51 1.002 50.2% -79 -6 50.5% +0.06 8–8 (50%) 6–11 (35%) 101.5 -0.32 1991 1504 104.7 +57 57.1% +0.57 1–0 0–1 +0.21
1992 1849 149.9 +1.29 -1.12 0.985 50.1% -31 -113 -257 52.3% +0.22 10–11 (48%) 10–13 (43%) 101.4 -1.91 1992 1546 125.4 +65 -88 35.1% -0.91 4–1 (80%) 2–5 (29%) 103.3 +0.26
1993 1937 156.7 +3.18 +1.96 1.128 52.1% +8 -173 -173 60.8% +0.75 16–11 (59%) 19–19 (50%) 100.8 -4.16 1993 1647 128.4 +28 -196 44.8% -0.40 6–6 (50%) 8–5 (62%) 105.4 +0.61
1994 1768 141.9 +0.19 +1.74 1.042 50.9% +34 -22 -59 51.3% +0.05 12–15 (44%) 11–8 (58%) 94.5 -0.27 1994 1630 133.5 -23 -172 +21 44.4% -0.32 3–13 (19%) 9–10 (47%) 92.4 -0.61
1995 1762 147.6 +1.13 +0.42 1.001 49.8% -23 +16 +10 50.8% -0.06 4–9 (31%) 12–7 (63%) 100.1 -3.16 1995 1619 133.0 +8 42.3% -0.55 9–8 (53%) 11–11 (50%) 102.9 -0.27
1996 1809 154.8 +2.69 +2.35 1.129 52.1% -33 +87 +32 63.1% +0.93 8–8 (50%) 10–6 (63%) 101.9 -1.10 1996 1709 139.5 +35 -23 47.9% -0.08 13–8 (62%) 13–18 (42%) 102.9 +1.26
1997 1832 150.4 +2.57 +1.89 1.093 51.3% -28 +52 +117 57.1% +0.51 14–11 (56%) 9–10 (47%) 100.8 -2.00 1997 1694 135.4 +35 -281 +7 48.3% -0.18 8–7 (53%) 16–10 (62%) 105.2 +0.62
1998 1765 148.9 +1.69 +0.86 1.058 51.0% +5 +162 +116 56.6% +0.30 12–10 (55%) 15–14 (52%) 96.7 -0.97 1998 1649 132.2 +16 +23 42.9% -0.50 7–7 (50%) 8–11 (42%) 98.6 -0.31
1999 1797 143.0 +1.68 -0.71 0.989 50.0% -26 -11 +162 55.2% +0.07 9–13 (41%) 25–10 (71%) 101.1 -2.23 1999 1578 123.5 +27 -177 +52 39.1% -0.78 1–7 (13%) 3–5 (38%) 90.9 -0.57
2000 1764 148.1 +2.89 +1.87 1.144 52.4% -10 +168 +138 60.6% +0.75 8–9 (47%) 15–13 (54%) 99.3 +0.89 2000 1615 127.5 -72 -159 +102 44.2% -0.34 7–3 (70%) 6–9 (40%) 105.2 +0.30
2001 1658 131.9 +0.83 -1.42 0.999 50.1% +19 +151 +176 46.7% -0.27 6–8 (43%) 12–9 (57%) 96.8 -0.75 2001 1514 96.3 +91 15.0% -1.90 0–2 +0.77
2002 1620 134.1 -0.60 -1.51 0.847 46.8% +33 +134 +147 35.1% -0.91 3–5 (38%) 3–7 (30%) 94.1 -2.76 2002 1525 111.4 +15 37.5% -0.75 1–1 -0.13
Career 1984 152.3 +1.77 +0.70 1.047 50.8% -10 +32 +46 54.2% +0.27 114–123 (48%) 149–132 (53%) 98.5 -2.84 Career 1732 136.6 +17 -170 +36 43.3% -0.43 59–60 (50%) 77–88 (47%) 101.6 +0.62

Career Rivalries

Each player's five most-played main-draw opponents. The current matchup is highlighted when it appears in a player's top five.