H2H data updated: 2026-07-19 14:15 UTC

Cedric Pioline vs Mats Wilander H2H: 2-0

Cedric Pioline holds a 2–0 lead over Mats Wilander in their ATP head-to-head. Across 2 main-draw meetings, Cedric Pioline leads 2–0 on hard courts. Most recently, Cedric Pioline won the 1993 Toulouse third round 7-5 6-3.

Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.

Cedric Pioline
FRA Age 57 Right-Handed 188 cm / 6'2"
H2H
2 – 0
2 main draw meetings
Mats Wilander
SWE Age 61 Right-Handed 183 cm / 6'0"

H2H Match Log

DateTournamentCategoryRoundSurfaceWinnerScoreLoserMatch
Oct 7, 1993* Toulouse ATP 250 R32 Hard Cedric Pioline #12 7-5 6-3 Mats Wilander #318 Match data
Sep 5, 1993* US Open Grand Slam R32 Hard Cedric Pioline #14 6-4 6-4 6-4 Mats Wilander #558 Match data

* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.

Career Comparison

Player Current Peak Pts Elo W L Win % GS 1000 Finals 500 250 Titles
Cedric Pioline #750 #5 2,335 1,983 370 301 55.1% 0 1 0 0 4 5
Mats Wilander #1,354 #1 1,075 2,262 526 203 72.2% 7 6 0 0 20 33

Career Progression by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.

Age Cedric Pioline Mats Wilander
YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles
15 — — — — — — — 1980 1–4 20.0% #283 1,496 0 0
16 — — — — — — — 1981 13–10 56.5% #73 1,662 0 0
17 — — — — — — — 1982 56–16 77.8% #8 2,020 1 4
18 — — — — — — — 1983 71–11 86.6% #4 2,246 2 13
19 — — — — — — — 1984 49–12 80.3% #4 2,177 3 16
20 1989 0–3 0.0% #202 1,483 0 0 1985 65–17 79.3% #3 2,108 4 19
21 1990 5–12 29.4% #118 1,484 0 0 1986 46–13 78.0% #3 2,056 4 21
22 1991 21–20 51.2% #51 1,664 0 0 1987 65–17 79.3% #3 2,082 4 26
23 1992 31–27 53.4% #33 1,845 0 0 1988 51–9 85.0% #1 2,152 7 32
24 1993 51–27 65.4% #10 1,936 0 0 1989 31–15 67.4% #12 1,922 7 32
25 1994 29–28 50.9% #51 1,767 0 0 1990 21–13 61.8% #41 1,894 7 33
26 1995 24–27 47.1% #54 1,760 0 0 1991 9–10 47.4% #159 1,767 7 33
27 1996 38–21 64.4% #21 1,805 0 1 — — — — — — —
28 1997 37–25 59.7% #20 1,834 0 2 1993 3–7 30.0% #330 1,695 7 33
29 1998 38–26 59.4% #18 1,764 0 2 1994 17–20 45.9% #129 1,652 7 33
30 1999 37–28 56.9% #13 1,795 0 3 1995 21–18 53.8% #46 1,766 7 33
31 2000 32–19 62.7% #16 1,760 0 5 1996 7–11 38.9% #196 1,679 7 33
32 2001 17–22 43.6% #84 1,657 0 5 — — — — — — —
33 2002 10–16 38.5% #119 1,618 0 5 — — — — — — —