H2H data updated: 2026-09-06 00:00 UTC

Cedric Pioline vs Michal Tabara H2H: 1-1

Cedric Pioline and Michal Tabara are tied 1–1 in their ATP head-to-head. Across 2 main-draw meetings, Cedric Pioline leads 1–0 on grass, while Michal Tabara leads 1–0 on hard courts. Most recently, Cedric Pioline won the 2001 Wimbledon round of 128 6-2 6-3 7-5.

Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.

Cedric Pioline
FRA Age 57 Right-Handed 188 cm / 6'2"
H2H
1 – 1
2 main-draw meetings
Michal Tabara
CZE Age 46 Right-Handed 175 cm / 5'9"

H2H Match Log

PlayerScorePlayerMatch DataDateRoundTournamentCategorySurface
Cedric Pioline #72 6-2 6-3 7-5 Michal Tabara #52 Match data Jun 27, 2001* R128 Wimbledon Grand Slam Grass
Michal Tabara #96 6-4 6-1 Cedric Pioline #16 Match data Jan 6, 2001* QF Chennai ATP International Series → modern equivalent ATP 250 Hard

Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable. Arrows show an edition's recorded category and documented modern equivalent; unresolved editions keep their recorded category. Asterisked totals include editions mapped from documented historical predecessor categories. Mapping details.

Career Comparison

Player Current Peak Pts Elo W L Win % GS 1000 including documented historical predecessor categories Finals 500 including documented historical predecessor categories 250 including documented historical predecessor categories Titles
Cedric Pioline #750 #5 2,335 1,984 370 301 55.1% 0 1 0 1 3 5
Michal Tabara #1,290 #47 773 1,686 39 52 42.9% 0 0 0 0 1 1

Career Progression by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.

Age Cedric Pioline Michal Tabara
YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles
16 — — — — — — — 1996 2–2 50.0% #309 1,507 0 0
17 — — — — — — — 1997 0–2 0.0% #216 1,496 0 0
18 — — — — — — — 1998 1–1 50.0% #202 1,500 0 0
19 — — — — — — — 1999 3–1 75.0% #123 1,542 0 0
20 1989 0–3 0.0% #202 1,482 0 0 2000 2–6 25.0% #96 1,510 0 0
21 1990 5–12 29.4% #118 1,484 0 0 2001 20–19 51.3% #64 1,597 0 1
22 1991 21–20 51.2% #51 1,664 0 0 2002 4–7 36.4% #210 1,586 0 1
23 1992 31–27 53.4% #33 1,849 0 0 — — — — — — —
24 1993 51–27 65.4% #10 1,936 0 0 2004 3–4 42.9% #98 1,655 0 1
25 1994 29–28 50.9% #51 1,768 0 0 2005 4–10 28.6% #172 1,559 0 1
26 1995 24–27 47.1% #54 1,761 0 0 — — — — — — —
27 1996 38–21 64.4% #21 1,808 0 1 — — — — — — —
28 1997 37–25 59.7% #20 1,831 0 2 — — — — — — —
29 1998 38–26 59.4% #18 1,765 0 2 — — — — — — —
30 1999 37–28 56.9% #13 1,796 0 3 — — — — — — —
31 2000 32–19 62.7% #16 1,763 0 5 — — — — — — —
32 2001 17–22 43.6% #84 1,658 0 5 — — — — — — —
33 2002 10–16 38.5% #119 1,619 0 5 — — — — — — —

Surface Results by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. Results cover completed main-draw matches. Bold green marks the higher win percentage when both players have at least 5 matches on that surface at the aligned age.

Age Cedric Pioline Michal Tabara
Yr HardClayGrassCarpet Yr HardClayGrassCarpet
W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win %
16 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 1996 — — — — 2 1 3 66.7% — — — — 0 1 1 0.0%
17 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 1997 — — — — 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — 0 1 1 0.0%
18 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 1998 — — — — 1 1 2 50.0% — — — — — — — —
19 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 1999 — — — — 3 1 4 75.0% — — — — — — — —
20 1989 — — — — 0 3 3 0.0% — — — — — — — — 2000 1 3 4 25.0% 1 3 4 25.0% — — — — — — — —
21 1990 0 1 1 0.0% 5 8 13 38.5% — — — — 0 3 3 0.0% 2001 9 9 18 50.0% 10 7 17 58.8% 0 1 1 0.0% 1 2 3 33.3%
22 1991 6 6 12 50.0% 11 9 20 55.0% 1 1 2 50.0% 3 4 7 42.9% 2002 2 4 6 33.3% 1 2 3 33.3% — — — — 1 1 2 50.0%
23 1992 13 10 23 56.5% 9 10 19 47.4% 1 2 3 33.3% 8 5 13 61.5% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
24 1993 19 9 28 67.9% 11 8 19 57.9% 8 3 11 72.7% 13 7 20 65.0% 2004 3 3 6 50.0% 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — — — — —
25 1994 15 11 26 57.7% 6 6 12 50.0% 1 3 4 25.0% 7 8 15 46.7% 2005 3 3 6 50.0% 1 6 7 14.3% 0 1 1 0.0% — — — —
26 1995 8 10 18 44.4% 6 8 14 42.9% 5 3 8 62.5% 5 6 11 45.5% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
27 1996 12 7 19 63.2% 11 5 16 68.8% 3 2 5 60.0% 12 7 19 63.2% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
28 1997 10 9 19 52.6% 13 7 20 65.0% 7 3 10 70.0% 7 6 13 53.8% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
29 1998 15 13 28 53.6% 12 6 18 66.7% 1 2 3 33.3% 10 5 15 66.7% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
30 1999 20 16 36 55.6% 1 6 7 14.3% 12 2 14 85.7% 4 4 8 50.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
31 2000 16 10 26 61.5% 13 3 16 81.3% 3 3 6 50.0% 0 3 3 0.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
32 2001 8 11 19 42.1% 7 8 15 46.7% 2 2 4 50.0% 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
33 2002 4 5 9 44.4% 4 6 10 40.0% 2 3 5 40.0% 0 2 2 0.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Career — 146 118 264 55.3% 109 93 202 54.0% 46 29 75 61.3% 69 61 130 53.1% — 18 22 40 45.0% 19 23 42 45.2% 0 2 2 0.0% 2 5 7 28.6%

Performance Progression by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. Detailed serve and return statistics available for 560/651 of Cedric Pioline's and 82/89 of Michal Tabara's main draw matches. Sample is shown as matches with detailed serve and return statistics / total main draw matches. Bold green marks the stronger value when both stat samples contain at least 5 matches; lower is better for DFs/M.

Age Cedric Pioline Michal Tabara
Yr Sample Aces/M DFs/M 1st Sv% 1st Pts% 2nd Pts% BP Saved% BP Conv% Svc Pts% Ret Pts% Yr Sample Aces/M DFs/M 1st Sv% 1st Pts% 2nd Pts% BP Saved% BP Conv% Svc Pts% Ret Pts%
16 — —/— — — — — — — — — — 1996 4/4 2.3 2.3 61.2% 61.7% 50.2% 50.6% 55.1% 56.3% 40.3%
18 — —/— — — — — — — — — — 1998 2/2 2.5 1.0 72.6% 62.9% 33.2% 25.0% 72.2% 54.7% 37.3%
19 — —/— — — — — — — — — — 1999 4/4 0.5 1.3 72.5% 62.3% 47.5% 58.3% 59.0% 58.0% 48.5%
20 — —/— — — — — — — — — — 2000 7/8 1.7 3.7 53.2% 63.4% 43.9% 53.2% 33.9% 53.7% 41.7%
21 — —/— — — — — — — — — — 2001 35/39 3.3 3.5 53.7% 68.5% 50.5% 55.5% 49.4% 59.7% 41.4%
22 1991 40/41 3.5 3.4 59.0% 68.7% 51.3% 60.4% 46.4% 61.6% 38.4% 2002 9/11 2.1 3.9 55.3% 62.7% 46.9% 51.1% 41.0% 56.2% 36.8%
23 1992 53/58 5.8 3.7 57.0% 74.5% 46.4% 59.3% 41.4% 62.6% 36.9% — —/— — — — — — — — — —
24 1993 68/78 5.7 3.0 59.8% 73.8% 52.0% 60.8% 40.6% 65.1% 39.4% 2004 7/7 5.1 8.0 43.2% 76.0% 48.8% 53.9% 34.2% 60.2% 38.0%
25 1994 44/57 4.5 3.3 60.1% 70.1% 48.9% 53.4% 42.1% 61.7% 39.9% 2005 14/14 5.0 8.5 43.4% 69.1% 46.2% 48.3% 39.0% 55.9% 39.3%
26 1995 44/51 4.9 3.8 57.9% 72.7% 48.2% 53.6% 37.8% 62.4% 37.6% — —/— — — — — — — — — —
27 1996 53/59 6.0 3.2 55.9% 75.1% 51.7% 62.1% 44.4% 64.9% 39.6% — —/— — — — — — — — — —
28 1997 51/62 5.9 3.5 60.9% 73.7% 51.1% 61.5% 42.4% 64.7% 38.6% — —/— — — — — — — — — —
29 1998 56/64 5.4 3.3 58.6% 73.5% 50.4% 59.3% 47.1% 63.8% 38.3% — —/— — — — — — — — — —
30 1999 54/65 6.0 4.6 54.4% 75.4% 49.2% 62.1% 42.4% 63.4% 36.2% — —/— — — — — — — — — —
31 2000 46/51 8.2 4.8 52.7% 78.8% 51.3% 60.8% 41.8% 65.5% 39.5% — —/— — — — — — — — — —
32 2001 31/39 8.3 4.6 52.5% 73.2% 51.4% 63.6% 40.7% 63.1% 36.9% — —/— — — — — — — — — —
33 2002 20/26 5.7 4.4 51.2% 71.3% 48.3% 45.7% 32.5% 60.3% 33.6% — —/— — — — — — — — — —
Career — 560/671 5.8 3.7 57.1% 73.7% 50.1% 59.3% 42.2% 63.5% 38.2% — 82/91 3.3 4.6 52.9% 67.4% 48.1% 52.6% 45.4% 57.8% 40.5%

Advanced Statistics Comparison by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. Metrics are precomputed from eligible main-draw results; point-stat values use the available detailed sample. Bold green marks the stronger value when both underlying samples are sufficient. Lower is better for Schedule because a negative value means a tougher schedule. Career Schedule is normalized per 100 matches.

Age Cedric Pioline Michal Tabara
Yr Elo P+ Serve+ Return+ PD TPW% Hard Elo Clay Elo Grass Elo Set Win % Set Margin Dec. Set Tiebreak Pressure+ Schedule Yr Elo P+ Serve+ Return+ PD TPW% Hard Elo Clay Elo Grass Elo Set Win % Set Margin Dec. Set Tiebreak Pressure+ Schedule
16 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 1996 1507 103.6 -1.71 -1.20 0.922 48.6% — +49 — 50.0% -0.20 1–1 — — +0.56
17 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 1997 1496 100.6 — — — — — — — 20.0% -2.40 0–1 1–0 — -0.29
18 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 1998 1501 99.5 -1.77 -0.34 0.823 45.2% — — — 40.0% -1.60 1–0 1–0 — +0.22
19 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 1999 1543 110.7 -1.19 +2.68 1.154 52.8% — +49 — 66.7% +1.11 1–0 — — +0.48
20 1989 1483 114.0 — — — — — +7 — 12.5% -1.88 0–1 — — -0.41 2000 1510 113.9 -3.25 +1.00 0.901 47.2% +6 +33 — 31.6% -1.32 0–1 0–2 — -0.32
21 1990 1484 124.4 — — — — +14 +43 — 34.9% -0.47 4–4 (50%) 2–5 (29%) 100.1 +0.10 2001 1597 128.2 -1.53 +2.41 1.028 50.7% -23 +33 — 50.0% -0.17 5–4 (56%) 2–2 (50%) 101.5 +0.70
22 1991 1665 135.0 +1.05 -0.51 1.002 50.2% -79 -6 — 50.5% +0.06 8–8 (50%) 6–11 (35%) 101.5 -0.32 2002 1586 110.8 -3.61 +0.85 0.839 47.0% -17 +32 — 30.8% -1.35 2–2 (50%) 1–1 — +0.09
23 1992 1849 149.9 +1.29 -1.12 0.985 50.1% -31 -113 -257 52.3% +0.22 10–11 (48%) 10–13 (43%) 101.4 -1.91 2003 1555 101.4 — — — — — — — — — — — — —
24 1993 1937 156.7 +3.18 +1.96 1.128 52.1% +8 -173 -173 60.8% +0.75 16–11 (59%) 19–19 (50%) 100.8 -4.16 2004 1655 125.2 -0.80 +1.37 0.955 48.7% +27 — — 45.8% -0.50 1–2 (33%) 0–1 — -0.10
25 1994 1768 141.9 +0.19 +1.74 1.042 50.9% +34 -22 -59 51.3% +0.05 12–15 (44%) 11–8 (58%) 94.5 -0.27 2005 1559 117.0 -3.23 +0.74 0.891 47.2% +100 -15 — 33.3% -1.08 2–3 (40%) 2–3 (40%) 96.9 -0.21
26 1995 1762 147.6 +1.13 +0.42 1.001 49.8% -23 +16 +10 50.8% -0.06 4–9 (31%) 12–7 (63%) 100.1 -3.16 2006 1539 97.0 — — — — — — — — — — — — —
27 1996 1809 154.8 +2.69 +2.35 1.129 52.1% -33 +87 +32 63.1% +0.93 8–8 (50%) 10–6 (63%) 101.9 -1.10 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
28 1997 1832 150.4 +2.57 +1.89 1.093 51.3% -28 +52 +117 57.1% +0.51 14–11 (56%) 9–10 (47%) 100.8 -2.00 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
29 1998 1765 148.9 +1.69 +0.86 1.058 51.0% +5 +162 +116 56.6% +0.30 12–10 (55%) 15–14 (52%) 96.7 -0.97 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
30 1999 1797 143.0 +1.68 -0.71 0.989 50.0% -26 -11 +162 55.2% +0.07 9–13 (41%) 25–10 (71%) 101.1 -2.23 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
31 2000 1764 148.1 +2.89 +1.87 1.144 52.4% -10 +168 +138 60.6% +0.75 8–9 (47%) 15–13 (54%) 99.3 +0.89 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
32 2001 1658 131.9 +0.83 -1.42 0.999 50.1% +19 +151 +176 46.7% -0.27 6–8 (43%) 12–9 (57%) 96.8 -0.75 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
33 2002 1620 134.1 -0.60 -1.51 0.847 46.8% +33 +134 +147 35.1% -0.91 3–5 (38%) 3–7 (30%) 94.1 -2.76 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Career — 1984 152.3 +1.77 +0.70 1.047 50.8% -10 +32 +46 54.2% +0.27 114–123 (48%) 149–132 (53%) 98.5 -2.84 — 1686 123.7 -2.13 +1.51 0.960 49.1% +4 +27 — 42.8% -0.62 13–14 (48%) 7–9 (44%) 99.8 +1.24

Career Rivalries

Each player's five most-played main-draw opponents. The current matchup is highlighted when it appears in a player's top five.