H2H data updated: 2026-07-18 02:15 UTC

Cedric Pioline vs Nicklas Kulti H2H: 4-3

Cedric Pioline holds a 4–3 lead over Nicklas Kulti in their ATP head-to-head. Across 7 main-draw meetings, Nicklas Kulti leads 2–1 on carpet, while Cedric Pioline leads 2–0 on clay. Most recently, Nicklas Kulti won the 1997 Miami Masters second round 2-6 6-4 7-6(8).

Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.

Cedric Pioline
FRA Age 57 Right-Handed 188 cm / 6'2"
H2H
4 – 3
7 main draw meetings
Nicklas Kulti
SWE Age 55 Right-Handed 190 cm / 6'3"

H2H Match Log

DateTournamentCategoryRoundSurfaceWinnerScoreLoserMatch
Mar 19, 1997* Miami Masters Masters 1000 R64 Hard Nicklas Kulti #70 2-6 6-4 7-6(8) Cedric Pioline #33 Match data
Aug 21, 1996* Canada Masters Masters 1000 R64 Hard Cedric Pioline #18 6-4 6-2 Nicklas Kulti #69 Match data
Oct 26, 1994* Stockholm Masters Masters 1000 R64 Carpet Nicklas Kulti #89 6-2 2-6 7-5 Cedric Pioline #43 Match data
May 11, 1994* Rome Masters Masters 1000 R64 Clay Cedric Pioline #14 6-4 6-3 Nicklas Kulti #80 Match data
Oct 14, 1993* Bolzano ATP 250 R32 Carpet Cedric Pioline #12 6-3 6-0 Nicklas Kulti #55 Match data
May 1, 1993* Munich ATP 250 QF Clay Cedric Pioline #23 4-6 6-1 6-3 Nicklas Kulti #35 Match data
Oct 30, 1991* Paris Masters Masters 1000 R64 Carpet Nicklas Kulti #94 7-6(7) 6-2 Cedric Pioline #51 Match data

* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.

Career Comparison

Player Current Peak Pts Elo W L Win % GS 1000 Finals 500 250 Titles
Cedric Pioline #750 #5 2,335 1,983 370 301 55.1% 0 1 0 0 4 5
Nicklas Kulti #977 #32 826 1,819 150 179 45.6% 0 0 0 0 3 3

Career Progression by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.

Age Cedric Pioline Nicklas Kulti
YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles
17 — — — — — — — 1988 3–4 42.9% #176 1,543 0 0
18 — — — — — — — 1989 7–9 43.8% #118 1,581 0 0
19 — — — — — — — 1990 15–11 57.7% #51 1,745 0 0
20 1989 0–3 0.0% #202 1,483 0 0 1991 18–24 42.9% #80 1,656 0 1
21 1990 5–12 29.4% #118 1,484 0 0 1992 18–23 43.9% #79 1,611 0 1
22 1991 21–20 51.2% #51 1,664 0 0 1993 27–24 52.9% #46 1,690 0 2
23 1992 31–27 53.4% #33 1,845 0 0 1994 20–26 43.5% #99 1,675 0 2
24 1993 51–27 65.4% #10 1,936 0 0 1995 6–8 42.9% #165 1,638 0 2
25 1994 29–28 50.9% #51 1,767 0 0 1996 14–16 46.7% #64 1,636 0 3
26 1995 24–27 47.1% #54 1,760 0 0 1997 9–17 34.6% #154 1,578 0 3
27 1996 38–21 64.4% #21 1,805 0 1 1998 3–3 50.0% #290 1,602 0 3
28 1997 37–25 59.7% #20 1,834 0 2 1999 10–9 52.6% #118 1,632 0 3
29 1998 38–26 59.4% #18 1,764 0 2 2000 0–5 0.0% #421 1,558 0 3
30 1999 37–28 56.9% #13 1,795 0 3 — — — — — — —
31 2000 32–19 62.7% #16 1,760 0 5 — — — — — — —
32 2001 17–22 43.6% #84 1,657 0 5 — — — — — — —
33 2002 10–16 38.5% #119 1,618 0 5 — — — — — — —