H2H data updated: 2026-07-18 14:16 UTC
Cedric Pioline vs Olivier Delaitre H2H: 1-1
Cedric Pioline and Olivier Delaitre are tied 1–1 in their ATP head-to-head. Across 2 main-draw meetings, Olivier Delaitre leads 1–0 on carpet, while Cedric Pioline leads 1–0 on hard courts. Most recently, Cedric Pioline won the 1996 Toulouse third round 4-6 6-3 6-2.
Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.
FRA
Age 57
Right-Handed
188 cm / 6'2"
H2H
1
–
1
2 main draw meetings
FRA
Age 59
Right-Handed
170 cm / 5'7"
H2H Match Log
| Date | Tournament | Category | Round | Surface | Winner | Score | Loser | Match |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Oct 17, 1996* | Toulouse | ATP 250 | R32 | Hard | Cedric Pioline | 4-6 6-3 6-2 | Olivier Delaitre | Match data |
| Oct 18, 1991* | Lyon | ATP 250 | R16 | Carpet | Olivier Delaitre | 6-2 6-7(6) 7-6(3) | Cedric Pioline | Match data |
* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.
Career Comparison
| Player | Current | Peak | Pts | Elo | W | L | Win % | GS | 1000 | Finals | 500 | 250 | Titles |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Cedric Pioline | #750 | #5 | 2,335 | 1,983 | 370 | 301 | 55.1% | 0 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 4 | 5 |
| Olivier Delaitre | #1,311 | #33 | 958 | 1,810 | 129 | 178 | 42.0% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
Career Progression by Age
Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.
| Age | Cedric Pioline | Olivier Delaitre | ||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | |
| 19 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1986 | 1–2 | 33.3% | #177 | 1,483 | 0 | 0 |
| 20 | 1989 | 0–3 | 0.0% | #202 | 1,483 | 0 | 0 | 1987 | 0–4 | 0.0% | #298 | 1,450 | 0 | 0 |
| 21 | 1990 | 5–12 | 29.4% | #118 | 1,484 | 0 | 0 | 1988 | 1–4 | 20.0% | #129 | 1,428 | 0 | 0 |
| 22 | 1991 | 21–20 | 51.2% | #51 | 1,664 | 0 | 0 | 1989 | 10–14 | 41.7% | #111 | 1,542 | 0 | 0 |
| 23 | 1992 | 31–27 | 53.4% | #33 | 1,845 | 0 | 0 | 1990 | 6–16 | 27.3% | #152 | 1,521 | 0 | 0 |
| 24 | 1993 | 51–27 | 65.4% | #10 | 1,936 | 0 | 0 | 1991 | 19–11 | 63.3% | #39 | 1,725 | 0 | 0 |
| 25 | 1994 | 29–28 | 50.9% | #51 | 1,767 | 0 | 0 | 1992 | 19–25 | 43.2% | #76 | 1,682 | 0 | 0 |
| 26 | 1995 | 24–27 | 47.1% | #54 | 1,760 | 0 | 0 | 1993 | 15–23 | 39.5% | #83 | 1,644 | 0 | 0 |
| 27 | 1996 | 38–21 | 64.4% | #21 | 1,805 | 0 | 1 | 1994 | 22–23 | 48.9% | #49 | 1,730 | 0 | 0 |
| 28 | 1997 | 37–25 | 59.7% | #20 | 1,834 | 0 | 2 | 1995 | 17–27 | 38.6% | #98 | 1,599 | 0 | 0 |
| 29 | 1998 | 38–26 | 59.4% | #18 | 1,764 | 0 | 2 | 1996 | 2–8 | 20.0% | #218 | 1,531 | 0 | 0 |
| 30 | 1999 | 37–28 | 56.9% | #13 | 1,795 | 0 | 3 | 1997 | 10–13 | 43.5% | #143 | 1,581 | 0 | 0 |
| 31 | 2000 | 32–19 | 62.7% | #16 | 1,760 | 0 | 5 | 1998 | 7–8 | 46.7% | #186 | 1,608 | 0 | 0 |
| 32 | 2001 | 17–22 | 43.6% | #84 | 1,657 | 0 | 5 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 33 | 2002 | 10–16 | 38.5% | #119 | 1,618 | 0 | 5 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |