H2H data updated: 2026-09-05 00:00 UTC

Cedric Pioline vs Omar Camporese H2H: 3-1

Cedric Pioline holds a 3–1 lead over Omar Camporese in their ATP head-to-head. Across 4 main-draw meetings, Cedric Pioline leads 2–0 on carpet, while they are tied 1–1 on clay. Most recently, Cedric Pioline won the 1997 Monte-Carlo Masters round of 64 6-3 6-4.

Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.

Cedric Pioline
FRA Age 57 Right-Handed 188 cm / 6'2"
H2H
3 – 1
4 main draw meetings
Omar Camporese
ITA Age 58 Right-Handed 188 cm / 6'2"

H2H Match Log

PlayerScorePlayerMatch DataDateRoundTournamentCategorySurface
Cedric Pioline #29 6-3 6-4 Omar Camporese #159 Match data Apr 23, 1997* R64 Monte-Carlo Masters Masters 1000 Clay
Cedric Pioline #27 4-6 6-4 6-1 Omar Camporese #136 Match data Feb 27, 1997* R32 Milan Championship Series → modern equivalent ATP 500 Carpet
Cedric Pioline #38 7-6(4) 3-6 6-3 Omar Camporese #37 Match data Nov 4, 1992* R64 Paris Masters Masters 1000 Carpet
Omar Camporese #47 6-4 3-6 6-3 Cedric Pioline #135 Match data Aug 24, 1990* R16 San Marino ATP World Series → modern equivalent ATP 250 Clay

Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable. Arrows show an edition's recorded category and documented modern equivalent; unresolved editions keep their recorded category. Asterisked totals include editions mapped from documented historical predecessor categories. Mapping details.

Career Comparison

Player Current Peak Pts Elo W L Win % GS 1000 including documented historical predecessor categories Finals 500 including documented historical predecessor categories 250 including documented historical predecessor categories Titles
Cedric Pioline #750 #5 2,335 1,984 370 301 55.1% 0 1 0 1 3 5
Omar Camporese #1,381 #18 1,253 1,916 138 148 48.3% 0 0 0 0 2 2

Career Progression by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.

Age Cedric Pioline Omar Camporese
YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles
18 — — — — — — — 1986 0–2 0.0% #766 1,476 0 0
19 — — — — — — — 1987 1–3 25.0% #283 1,451 0 0
20 1989 0–3 0.0% #202 1,482 0 0 1988 4–8 33.3% #216 1,464 0 0
21 1990 5–12 29.4% #118 1,484 0 0 1989 15–14 51.7% #49 1,600 0 0
22 1991 21–20 51.2% #51 1,664 0 0 1990 28–21 57.1% #45 1,731 0 0
23 1992 31–27 53.4% #33 1,849 0 0 1991 36–25 59.0% #24 1,788 0 1
24 1993 51–27 65.4% #10 1,936 0 0 1992 27–23 54.0% #42 1,695 0 2
25 1994 29–28 50.9% #51 1,768 0 0 1993 12–12 50.0% #111 1,653 0 2
26 1995 24–27 47.1% #54 1,761 0 0 1994 3–14 17.6% #244 1,521 0 2
27 1996 38–21 64.4% #21 1,808 0 1 1995 6–4 60.0% #120 1,598 0 2
28 1997 37–25 59.7% #20 1,831 0 2 1996 5–13 27.8% #127 1,554 0 2
29 1998 38–26 59.4% #18 1,765 0 2 1997 1–8 11.1% #336 1,503 0 2
30 1999 37–28 56.9% #13 1,796 0 3 1998 0–1 0.0% #524 1,486 0 2
31 2000 32–19 62.7% #16 1,763 0 5 — — — — — — —
32 2001 17–22 43.6% #84 1,658 0 5 — — — — — — —
33 2002 10–16 38.5% #119 1,619 0 5 — — — — — — —

Surface Results by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. Results cover completed main-draw matches. Bold green marks the higher win percentage when both players have at least 5 matches on that surface at the aligned age.

Age Cedric Pioline Omar Camporese
Yr HardClayGrassCarpet Yr HardClayGrassCarpet
W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win %
18 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 1986 — — — — 0 2 2 0.0% — — — — — — — —
19 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 1987 — — — — 1 3 4 25.0% — — — — — — — —
20 1989 — — — — 0 3 3 0.0% — — — — — — — — 1988 1 4 5 20.0% 3 4 7 42.9% — — — — — — — —
21 1990 0 1 1 0.0% 5 8 13 38.5% — — — — 0 3 3 0.0% 1989 2 4 6 33.3% 11 6 17 64.7% 1 2 3 33.3% 1 2 3 33.3%
22 1991 6 6 12 50.0% 11 9 20 55.0% 1 1 2 50.0% 3 4 7 42.9% 1990 1 3 4 25.0% 26 14 40 65.0% — — — — 1 4 5 20.0%
23 1992 13 10 23 56.5% 9 10 19 47.4% 1 2 3 33.3% 8 5 13 61.5% 1991 12 6 18 66.7% 11 12 23 47.8% 3 2 5 60.0% 10 5 15 66.7%
24 1993 19 9 28 67.9% 11 8 19 57.9% 8 3 11 72.7% 13 7 20 65.0% 1992 10 6 16 62.5% 7 9 16 43.8% 0 2 2 0.0% 10 6 16 62.5%
25 1994 15 11 26 57.7% 6 6 12 50.0% 1 3 4 25.0% 7 8 15 46.7% 1993 3 2 5 60.0% 3 6 9 33.3% — — — — 6 4 10 60.0%
26 1995 8 10 18 44.4% 6 8 14 42.9% 5 3 8 62.5% 5 6 11 45.5% 1994 1 2 3 33.3% 1 5 6 16.7% 1 2 3 33.3% 0 5 5 0.0%
27 1996 12 7 19 63.2% 11 5 16 68.8% 3 2 5 60.0% 12 7 19 63.2% 1995 — — — — 3 2 5 60.0% — — — — 3 2 5 60.0%
28 1997 10 9 19 52.6% 13 7 20 65.0% 7 3 10 70.0% 7 6 13 53.8% 1996 — — — — 2 9 11 18.2% — — — — 3 4 7 42.9%
29 1998 15 13 28 53.6% 12 6 18 66.7% 1 2 3 33.3% 10 5 15 66.7% 1997 — — — — 0 6 6 0.0% — — — — 1 2 3 33.3%
30 1999 20 16 36 55.6% 1 6 7 14.3% 12 2 14 85.7% 4 4 8 50.0% 1998 — — — — 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — — — — —
31 2000 16 10 26 61.5% 13 3 16 81.3% 3 3 6 50.0% 0 3 3 0.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
32 2001 8 11 19 42.1% 7 8 15 46.7% 2 2 4 50.0% 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
33 2002 4 5 9 44.4% 4 6 10 40.0% 2 3 5 40.0% 0 2 2 0.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Career — 146 118 264 55.3% 109 93 202 54.0% 46 29 75 61.3% 69 61 130 53.1% — 30 27 57 52.6% 68 79 147 46.3% 5 8 13 38.5% 35 34 69 50.7%

Performance Progression by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. Detailed serve and return statistics available for 560/651 of Cedric Pioline's and 168/190 of Omar Camporese's main draw matches. Sample is shown as matches with detailed serve and return statistics / total main draw matches. Bold green marks the stronger value when both stat samples contain at least 5 matches; lower is better for DFs/M.

Age Cedric Pioline Omar Camporese
Yr Sample Aces/M DFs/M 1st Sv% 1st Pts% 2nd Pts% BP Saved% BP Conv% Svc Pts% Ret Pts% Yr Sample Aces/M DFs/M 1st Sv% 1st Pts% 2nd Pts% BP Saved% BP Conv% Svc Pts% Ret Pts%
22 1991 40/41 3.5 3.4 59.0% 68.7% 51.3% 60.4% 46.4% 61.6% 38.4% — —/— — — — — — — — — —
23 1992 53/58 5.8 3.7 57.0% 74.5% 46.4% 59.3% 41.4% 62.6% 36.9% 1991 55/61 6.3 2.4 49.7% 75.5% 51.7% 55.4% 47.1% 63.3% 39.2%
24 1993 68/78 5.7 3.0 59.8% 73.8% 52.0% 60.8% 40.6% 65.1% 39.4% 1992 43/50 6.0 3.0 51.0% 72.8% 51.0% 63.2% 47.0% 61.9% 37.7%
25 1994 44/57 4.5 3.3 60.1% 70.1% 48.9% 53.4% 42.1% 61.7% 39.9% 1993 23/24 4.2 2.5 50.5% 73.9% 52.8% 56.5% 45.5% 63.4% 38.3%
26 1995 44/51 4.9 3.8 57.9% 72.7% 48.2% 53.6% 37.8% 62.4% 37.6% 1994 15/17 4.3 2.8 52.9% 69.4% 44.4% 51.0% 39.5% 57.6% 32.6%
27 1996 53/59 6.0 3.2 55.9% 75.1% 51.7% 62.1% 44.4% 64.9% 39.6% 1995 10/10 6.2 1.5 51.7% 76.7% 52.2% 67.0% 48.0% 65.0% 36.2%
28 1997 51/62 5.9 3.5 60.9% 73.7% 51.1% 61.5% 42.4% 64.7% 38.6% 1996 14/18 5.8 2.4 48.9% 69.8% 47.1% 60.2% 38.3% 58.1% 33.4%
29 1998 56/64 5.4 3.3 58.6% 73.5% 50.4% 59.3% 47.1% 63.8% 38.3% 1997 7/9 5.4 2.4 46.6% 74.0% 43.4% 53.7% 29.7% 57.7% 29.3%
30 1999 54/65 6.0 4.6 54.4% 75.4% 49.2% 62.1% 42.4% 63.4% 36.2% 1998 1/1 4.0 3.0 44.1% 70.0% 39.5% 50.0% 50.0% 52.9% 32.7%
31 2000 46/51 8.2 4.8 52.7% 78.8% 51.3% 60.8% 41.8% 65.5% 39.5% — —/— — — — — — — — — —
32 2001 31/39 8.3 4.6 52.5% 73.2% 51.4% 63.6% 40.7% 63.1% 36.9% — —/— — — — — — — — — —
33 2002 20/26 5.7 4.4 51.2% 71.3% 48.3% 45.7% 32.5% 60.3% 33.6% — —/— — — — — — — — — —
Career — 560/671 5.8 3.7 57.1% 73.7% 50.1% 59.3% 42.2% 63.5% 38.2% — 168/286 5.7 2.6 50.3% 73.5% 50.3% 58.1% 44.8% 61.8% 37.0%

Advanced Statistics Comparison by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. Metrics are precomputed from eligible main-draw results; point-stat values use the available detailed sample. Bold green marks the stronger value when both underlying samples are sufficient. Lower is better for Schedule because a negative value means a tougher schedule. Career Schedule is normalized per 100 matches.

Age Cedric Pioline Omar Camporese
Yr Elo P+ Serve+ Return+ PD TPW% Hard Elo Clay Elo Grass Elo Set Win % Set Margin Dec. Set Tiebreak Pressure+ Schedule Yr Elo P+ Serve+ Return+ PD TPW% Hard Elo Clay Elo Grass Elo Set Win % Set Margin Dec. Set Tiebreak Pressure+ Schedule
18 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 1986 1477 100.4 — — — — — — — 20.0% -1.80 0–1 0–1 — +0.12
19 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 1987 1451 101.1 — — — — — +35 — 40.0% -0.90 0–2 — — +0.80
20 1989 1483 114.0 — — — — — +7 — 12.5% -1.88 0–1 — — -0.41 1988 1465 110.6 — — — — +33 +47 — 33.3% -1.59 0–1 2–1 (67%) — +0.70
21 1990 1484 124.4 — — — — +14 +43 — 34.9% -0.47 4–4 (50%) 2–5 (29%) 100.1 +0.10 1989 1600 137.2 — — — — -99 +92 -48 51.3% -0.05 5–6 (45%) 6–2 (75%) 104.5 +0.08
22 1991 1665 135.0 +1.05 -0.51 1.002 50.2% -79 -6 — 50.5% +0.06 8–8 (50%) 6–11 (35%) 101.5 -0.32 1990 1732 145.4 — — — — -236 +86 — 56.3% +0.55 7–7 (50%) 4–10 (29%) 96.0 +0.42
23 1992 1849 149.9 +1.29 -1.12 0.985 50.1% -31 -113 -257 52.3% +0.22 10–11 (48%) 10–13 (43%) 101.4 -1.91 1991 1789 147.8 +2.10 +0.74 1.068 51.2% +27 -56 -178 55.9% +0.50 13–10 (57%) 11–12 (48%) 105.5 +1.37
24 1993 1937 156.7 +3.18 +1.96 1.128 52.1% +8 -173 -173 60.8% +0.75 16–11 (59%) 19–19 (50%) 100.8 -4.16 1992 1695 139.7 +0.73 -0.60 0.989 50.1% +69 -14 — 51.9% +0.11 13–10 (57%) 11–8 (58%) 102.0 +0.08
25 1994 1768 141.9 +0.19 +1.74 1.042 50.9% +34 -22 -59 51.3% +0.05 12–15 (44%) 11–8 (58%) 94.5 -0.27 1993 1653 133.3 +1.45 -0.77 1.048 51.1% +97 -17 — 48.3% +0.02 5–3 (63%) 5–5 (50%) 101.1 +1.06
26 1995 1762 147.6 +1.13 +0.42 1.001 49.8% -23 +16 +10 50.8% -0.06 4–9 (31%) 12–7 (63%) 100.1 -3.16 1994 1521 106.9 -1.61 -3.65 0.769 45.6% +112 +47 +53 26.8% -1.29 1–4 (20%) 0–6 (0%) 90.3 +0.43
27 1996 1809 154.8 +2.69 +2.35 1.129 52.1% -33 +87 +32 63.1% +0.93 8–8 (50%) 10–6 (63%) 101.9 -1.10 1995 1598 121.9 +1.20 -1.20 1.033 50.8% +64 +16 — 57.7% +0.08 3–3 (50%) 6–1 (86%) 103.9 +0.49
28 1997 1832 150.4 +2.57 +1.89 1.093 51.3% -28 +52 +117 57.1% +0.51 14–11 (56%) 9–10 (47%) 100.8 -2.00 1996 1555 122.8 -1.50 -1.75 0.797 46.1% +127 -40 — 35.0% -1.12 0–4 (0%) 3–0 (100%) 96.9 -0.83
29 1998 1765 148.9 +1.69 +0.86 1.058 51.0% +5 +162 +116 56.6% +0.30 12–10 (55%) 15–14 (52%) 96.7 -0.97 1997 1504 114.1 -0.39 -2.74 0.693 44.0% +161 -20 — 15.8% -2.32 0–1 2–0 — -0.56
30 1999 1797 143.0 +1.68 -0.71 0.989 50.0% -26 -11 +162 55.2% +0.07 9–13 (41%) 25–10 (71%) 101.1 -2.23 1998 1487 97.9 -0.73 -0.91 0.695 43.9% — — — 0.0% -2.00 — — — +0.21
31 2000 1764 148.1 +2.89 +1.87 1.144 52.4% -10 +168 +138 60.6% +0.75 8–9 (47%) 15–13 (54%) 99.3 +0.89 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
32 2001 1658 131.9 +0.83 -1.42 0.999 50.1% +19 +151 +176 46.7% -0.27 6–8 (43%) 12–9 (57%) 96.8 -0.75 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
33 2002 1620 134.1 -0.60 -1.51 0.847 46.8% +33 +134 +147 35.1% -0.91 3–5 (38%) 3–7 (30%) 94.1 -2.76 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Career — 1984 152.3 +1.77 +0.70 1.047 50.8% -10 +32 +46 54.2% +0.27 114–123 (48%) 149–132 (53%) 98.5 -2.84 — 1917 141.7 +0.85 -0.68 0.969 49.6% +34 +25 -80 48.8% -0.06 47–52 (47%) 50–46 (52%) 100.7 +1.53

Career Rivalries

Each player's five most-played main-draw opponents. The current matchup is highlighted when it appears in a player's top five.