H2H data updated: 2026-07-18 02:15 UTC

Cedric Pioline vs Omar Camporese H2H: 3-1

Cedric Pioline holds a 3–1 lead over Omar Camporese in their ATP head-to-head. Across 4 main-draw meetings, Cedric Pioline leads 2–0 on carpet, while they are tied 1–1 on clay. Most recently, Cedric Pioline won the 1997 Monte Carlo Masters second round 6-3 6-4.

Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.

Cedric Pioline
FRA Age 57 Right-Handed 188 cm / 6'2"
H2H
3 – 1
4 main draw meetings
Omar Camporese
ITA Age 58 Right-Handed 188 cm / 6'2"

H2H Match Log

DateTournamentCategoryRoundSurfaceWinnerScoreLoserMatch
Apr 23, 1997* Monte Carlo Masters Masters 1000 R64 Clay Cedric Pioline #29 6-3 6-4 Omar Camporese #159 Match data
Feb 27, 1997* Milan ATP 250 R32 Carpet Cedric Pioline #27 4-6 6-4 6-1 Omar Camporese #136 Match data
Nov 4, 1992* Paris Masters Masters 1000 R64 Carpet Cedric Pioline #38 7-6(4) 3-6 6-3 Omar Camporese #37 Match data
Aug 24, 1990* San Marino ATP 250 R16 Clay Omar Camporese #47 6-4 3-6 6-3 Cedric Pioline #135 Match data

* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.

Career Comparison

Player Current Peak Pts Elo W L Win % GS 1000 Finals 500 250 Titles
Cedric Pioline #750 #5 2,335 1,983 370 301 55.1% 0 1 0 0 4 5
Omar Camporese #1,381 #18 1,253 1,915 137 146 48.4% 0 0 0 0 2 2

Career Progression by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.

Age Cedric Pioline Omar Camporese
YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles
18 — — — — — — — 1986 0–2 0.0% #766 1,476 0 0
19 — — — — — — — 1987 1–3 25.0% #283 1,451 0 0
20 1989 0–3 0.0% #202 1,483 0 0 1988 4–7 36.4% #216 1,469 0 0
21 1990 5–12 29.4% #118 1,484 0 0 1989 15–14 51.7% #49 1,600 0 0
22 1991 21–20 51.2% #51 1,664 0 0 1990 28–21 57.1% #45 1,731 0 0
23 1992 31–27 53.4% #33 1,845 0 0 1991 36–25 59.0% #24 1,788 0 1
24 1993 51–27 65.4% #10 1,936 0 0 1992 26–22 54.2% #42 1,696 0 2
25 1994 29–28 50.9% #51 1,767 0 0 1993 12–12 50.0% #111 1,653 0 2
26 1995 24–27 47.1% #54 1,760 0 0 1994 3–14 17.6% #244 1,521 0 2
27 1996 38–21 64.4% #21 1,805 0 1 1995 6–4 60.0% #120 1,598 0 2
28 1997 37–25 59.7% #20 1,834 0 2 1996 5–13 27.8% #127 1,555 0 2
29 1998 38–26 59.4% #18 1,764 0 2 1997 1–8 11.1% #336 1,503 0 2
30 1999 37–28 56.9% #13 1,795 0 3 1998 0–1 0.0% #524 1,486 0 2
31 2000 32–19 62.7% #16 1,760 0 5 — — — — — — —
32 2001 17–22 43.6% #84 1,657 0 5 — — — — — — —
33 2002 10–16 38.5% #119 1,618 0 5 — — — — — — —