H2H data updated: 2026-09-09 00:00 UTC

Cedric Pioline vs Patrik Kuhnen H2H: 2-1

Cedric Pioline holds a 2–1 lead over Patrik Kuhnen in their ATP head-to-head. Across 3 main-draw meetings, Patrik Kuhnen leads 1–0 on carpet, while Cedric Pioline leads 1–0 on clay. Most recently, Cedric Pioline won the 1993 Tiriac Open round of 32 6-4 6-2.

Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.

Cedric Pioline
FRA Age 57 Right-Handed 188 cm / 6'2"
H2H
2 – 1
3 main-draw meetings
Patrik Kuhnen
GER Age 60 Right-Handed 190 cm / 6'3"

H2H Match Log

PlayerScorePlayerMatch DataDateRoundTournamentCategorySurface
Cedric Pioline #11 6-4 6-2 Patrik Kuhnen #109 Match data Sep 16, 1993* R32 Tiriac Open ATP World Series → modern equivalent ATP 250 Clay
Cedric Pioline #34 4-6 7-6(7) 6-3 6-2 Patrik Kuhnen #82 Match data Jan 20, 1993* R128 Australian Open Grand Slam Hard
Patrik Kuhnen #93 7-6(5) 6-3 Cedric Pioline #56 Match data Oct 12, 1991* QF Berlin ATP World Series → modern equivalent ATP 250 Carpet

Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable. Arrows show an edition's recorded category and documented modern equivalent; unresolved editions keep their recorded category. Asterisked totals include editions mapped from documented historical predecessor categories. Mapping details.

Career Comparison

Player Current Peak Pts Elo W L Win % GS 1000 including documented historical predecessor categories Finals 500 including documented historical predecessor categories 250 including documented historical predecessor categories Titles
Cedric Pioline #750 #5 2,335 1,984 370 301 55.1% 0 1 0 1 3 5
Patrik Kuhnen #1,341 #43 574 1,789 126 151 45.5% 0 0 0 0 0 0

Career Progression by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.

Age Cedric Pioline Patrik Kuhnen
YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles
20 1989 0–3 0.0% #202 1,482 0 0 1986 1–3 25.0% #170 1,508 0 0
21 1990 5–12 29.4% #118 1,484 0 0 1987 10–12 45.5% #83 1,582 0 0
22 1991 21–20 51.2% #51 1,664 0 0 1988 16–16 50.0% #61 1,701 0 0
23 1992 31–27 53.4% #33 1,849 0 0 1989 15–12 55.6% #69 1,744 0 0
24 1993 51–27 65.4% #10 1,936 0 0 1990 23–22 51.1% #82 1,675 0 0
25 1994 29–28 50.9% #51 1,768 0 0 1991 21–24 46.7% #86 1,661 0 0
26 1995 24–27 47.1% #54 1,761 0 0 1992 16–23 41.0% #89 1,656 0 0
27 1996 38–21 64.4% #21 1,808 0 1 1993 13–22 37.1% #119 1,631 0 0
28 1997 37–25 59.7% #20 1,831 0 2 1994 6–8 42.9% #189 1,633 0 0
29 1998 38–26 59.4% #18 1,765 0 2 1995 4–7 36.4% #187 1,614 0 0
30 1999 37–28 56.9% #13 1,796 0 3 1996 1–2 33.3% #504 1,609 0 0
31 2000 32–19 62.7% #16 1,763 0 5 — — — — — — —
32 2001 17–22 43.6% #84 1,658 0 5 — — — — — — —
33 2002 10–16 38.5% #119 1,619 0 5 — — — — — — —

Surface Results by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. Results cover completed main-draw matches. Bold green marks the higher win percentage when both players have at least 5 matches on that surface at the aligned age.

Age Cedric Pioline Patrik Kuhnen
Yr HardClayGrassCarpet Yr HardClayGrassCarpet
W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win %
20 1989 — — — — 0 3 3 0.0% — — — — — — — — 1986 1 2 3 33.3% 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — — — — —
21 1990 0 1 1 0.0% 5 8 13 38.5% — — — — 0 3 3 0.0% 1987 5 5 10 50.0% 3 3 6 50.0% 2 4 6 33.3% — — — —
22 1991 6 6 12 50.0% 11 9 20 55.0% 1 1 2 50.0% 3 4 7 42.9% 1988 2 5 7 28.6% 2 3 5 40.0% 5 3 8 62.5% 7 5 12 58.3%
23 1992 13 10 23 56.5% 9 10 19 47.4% 1 2 3 33.3% 8 5 13 61.5% 1989 6 3 9 66.7% 4 4 8 50.0% 2 2 4 50.0% 3 3 6 50.0%
24 1993 19 9 28 67.9% 11 8 19 57.9% 8 3 11 72.7% 13 7 20 65.0% 1990 13 13 26 50.0% 3 2 5 60.0% 2 3 5 40.0% 5 4 9 55.6%
25 1994 15 11 26 57.7% 6 6 12 50.0% 1 3 4 25.0% 7 8 15 46.7% 1991 11 10 21 52.4% 2 5 7 28.6% 4 2 6 66.7% 4 7 11 36.4%
26 1995 8 10 18 44.4% 6 8 14 42.9% 5 3 8 62.5% 5 6 11 45.5% 1992 11 12 23 47.8% 0 2 2 0.0% 2 4 6 33.3% 3 5 8 37.5%
27 1996 12 7 19 63.2% 11 5 16 68.8% 3 2 5 60.0% 12 7 19 63.2% 1993 4 9 13 30.8% 2 4 6 33.3% 1 3 4 25.0% 6 6 12 50.0%
28 1997 10 9 19 52.6% 13 7 20 65.0% 7 3 10 70.0% 7 6 13 53.8% 1994 2 4 6 33.3% 1 1 2 50.0% 1 1 2 50.0% 2 2 4 50.0%
29 1998 15 13 28 53.6% 12 6 18 66.7% 1 2 3 33.3% 10 5 15 66.7% 1995 0 1 1 0.0% 0 1 1 0.0% 0 1 1 0.0% 4 4 8 50.0%
30 1999 20 16 36 55.6% 1 6 7 14.3% 12 2 14 85.7% 4 4 8 50.0% 1996 — — — — 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — 1 1 2 50.0%
31 2000 16 10 26 61.5% 13 3 16 81.3% 3 3 6 50.0% 0 3 3 0.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
32 2001 8 11 19 42.1% 7 8 15 46.7% 2 2 4 50.0% 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
33 2002 4 5 9 44.4% 4 6 10 40.0% 2 3 5 40.0% 0 2 2 0.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Career — 146 118 264 55.3% 109 93 202 54.0% 46 29 75 61.3% 69 61 130 53.1% — 55 64 119 46.2% 17 27 44 38.6% 19 23 42 45.2% 35 37 72 48.6%

Performance Progression by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. Detailed serve and return statistics available for 560/651 of Cedric Pioline's and 129/147 of Patrik Kuhnen's main draw matches. Sample is shown as matches with detailed serve and return statistics / total main draw matches. Bold green marks the stronger value when both stat samples contain at least 5 matches; lower is better for DFs/M.

Age Cedric Pioline Patrik Kuhnen
Yr Sample Aces/M DFs/M 1st Sv% 1st Pts% 2nd Pts% BP Saved% BP Conv% Svc Pts% Ret Pts% Yr Sample Aces/M DFs/M 1st Sv% 1st Pts% 2nd Pts% BP Saved% BP Conv% Svc Pts% Ret Pts%
22 1991 40/41 3.5 3.4 59.0% 68.7% 51.3% 60.4% 46.4% 61.6% 38.4% — —/— — — — — — — — — —
23 1992 53/58 5.8 3.7 57.0% 74.5% 46.4% 59.3% 41.4% 62.6% 36.9% — —/— — — — — — — — — —
24 1993 68/78 5.7 3.0 59.8% 73.8% 52.0% 60.8% 40.6% 65.1% 39.4% — —/— — — — — — — — — —
25 1994 44/57 4.5 3.3 60.1% 70.1% 48.9% 53.4% 42.1% 61.7% 39.9% 1991 40/45 5.4 4.0 55.4% 73.2% 47.9% 53.4% 49.0% 62.0% 38.5%
26 1995 44/51 4.9 3.8 57.9% 72.7% 48.2% 53.6% 37.8% 62.4% 37.6% 1992 31/39 8.0 4.6 57.5% 73.9% 44.8% 64.3% 38.9% 61.3% 35.2%
27 1996 53/59 6.0 3.2 55.9% 75.1% 51.7% 62.1% 44.4% 64.9% 39.6% 1993 33/35 6.0 3.7 52.8% 73.8% 47.3% 52.7% 43.7% 61.4% 35.1%
28 1997 51/62 5.9 3.5 60.9% 73.7% 51.1% 61.5% 42.4% 64.7% 38.6% 1994 12/14 5.4 3.6 59.2% 70.9% 49.8% 61.1% 26.8% 62.0% 36.9%
29 1998 56/64 5.4 3.3 58.6% 73.5% 50.4% 59.3% 47.1% 63.8% 38.3% 1995 11/11 8.3 3.7 55.3% 74.1% 44.2% 51.9% 42.6% 60.9% 31.2%
30 1999 54/65 6.0 4.6 54.4% 75.4% 49.2% 62.1% 42.4% 63.4% 36.2% 1996 2/3 12.5 6.0 58.1% 84.3% 44.1% 81.7% 50.0% 67.0% 27.1%
31 2000 46/51 8.2 4.8 52.7% 78.8% 51.3% 60.8% 41.8% 65.5% 39.5% — —/— — — — — — — — — —
32 2001 31/39 8.3 4.6 52.5% 73.2% 51.4% 63.6% 40.7% 63.1% 36.9% — —/— — — — — — — — — —
33 2002 20/26 5.7 4.4 51.2% 71.3% 48.3% 45.7% 32.5% 60.3% 33.6% — —/— — — — — — — — — —
Career — 560/671 5.8 3.7 57.1% 73.7% 50.1% 59.3% 42.2% 63.5% 38.2% — 129/277 6.5 4.0 55.6% 73.6% 46.8% 56.9% 42.6% 61.7% 35.9%

Advanced Statistics Comparison by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. Metrics use eligible main-draw results; point statistics use matches with detailed data. Bold green marks the stronger value when both underlying samples are sufficient. Lower is better for Schedule because a negative value means a tougher schedule. Career Schedule is normalized per 100 matches.

Age Cedric Pioline Patrik Kuhnen
Yr Elo P+ Serve+ Return+ PD TPW% Hard Elo Clay Elo Grass Elo Set Win % Set Margin Dec. Set Tiebreak Pressure+ Schedule Yr Elo P+ Serve+ Return+ PD TPW% Hard Elo Clay Elo Grass Elo Set Win % Set Margin Dec. Set Tiebreak Pressure+ Schedule
20 1989 1483 114.0 — — — — — +7 — 12.5% -1.88 0–1 — — -0.41 1986 1508 110.1 — — — — +42 — — 33.3% -2.33 0–1 3–0 (100%) — -0.37
21 1990 1484 124.4 — — — — +14 +43 — 34.9% -0.47 4–4 (50%) 2–5 (29%) 100.1 +0.10 1987 1583 123.1 — — — — +5 -20 -85 43.9% -0.12 5–5 (50%) 2–6 (25%) 99.3 +0.03
22 1991 1665 135.0 +1.05 -0.51 1.002 50.2% -79 -6 — 50.5% +0.06 8–8 (50%) 6–11 (35%) 101.5 -0.32 1988 1701 124.9 — — — — -76 -125 -46 53.4% +0.05 5–5 (50%) 8–7 (53%) 104.7 +1.00
23 1992 1849 149.9 +1.29 -1.12 0.985 50.1% -31 -113 -257 52.3% +0.22 10–11 (48%) 10–13 (43%) 101.4 -1.91 1989 1745 137.3 — — — — -48 -105 -91 51.5% +0.12 6–2 (75%) 6–5 (55%) 105.7 -0.67
24 1993 1937 156.7 +3.18 +1.96 1.128 52.1% +8 -173 -173 60.8% +0.75 16–11 (59%) 19–19 (50%) 100.8 -4.16 1990 1675 136.1 — — — — +17 +15 -18 48.6% -0.14 7–5 (58%) 11–5 (69%) 104.8 -0.51
25 1994 1768 141.9 +0.19 +1.74 1.042 50.9% +34 -22 -59 51.3% +0.05 12–15 (44%) 11–8 (58%) 94.5 -0.27 1991 1662 134.0 +0.64 -0.43 1.013 50.2% +11 -14 +54 50.9% +0.10 3–11 (21%) 3–8 (27%) 88.6 +0.13
26 1995 1762 147.6 +1.13 +0.42 1.001 49.8% -23 +16 +10 50.8% -0.06 4–9 (31%) 12–7 (63%) 100.1 -3.16 1992 1657 134.5 +0.21 -2.10 0.908 48.4% +18 — +40 43.8% -0.31 4–7 (36%) 9–10 (47%) 99.0 -0.13
27 1996 1809 154.8 +2.69 +2.35 1.129 52.1% -33 +87 +32 63.1% +0.93 8–8 (50%) 10–6 (63%) 101.9 -1.10 1993 1632 125.3 -0.07 -2.17 0.909 48.4% +13 -44 +14 42.7% -0.49 5–8 (38%) 8–8 (50%) 98.6 +0.06
28 1997 1832 150.4 +2.57 +1.89 1.093 51.3% -28 +52 +117 57.1% +0.51 14–11 (56%) 9–10 (47%) 100.8 -2.00 1994 1633 115.0 -0.25 -1.36 0.970 48.8% -15 — — 40.5% -0.76 2–1 (67%) 2–1 (67%) 102.8 +0.57
29 1998 1765 148.9 +1.69 +0.86 1.058 51.0% +5 +162 +116 56.6% +0.30 12–10 (55%) 15–14 (52%) 96.7 -0.97 1995 1615 117.6 -0.55 -2.86 0.797 46.5% +14 — — 37.0% -0.70 3–2 (60%) 2–0 — +0.15
30 1999 1797 143.0 +1.68 -0.71 0.989 50.0% -26 -11 +162 55.2% +0.07 9–13 (41%) 25–10 (71%) 101.1 -2.23 1996 1609 105.0 -0.52 -3.09 0.820 48.5% — — — 28.6% -1.14 1–0 0–1 — -0.02
31 2000 1764 148.1 +2.89 +1.87 1.144 52.4% -10 +168 +138 60.6% +0.75 8–9 (47%) 15–13 (54%) 99.3 +0.89 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
32 2001 1658 131.9 +0.83 -1.42 0.999 50.1% +19 +151 +176 46.7% -0.27 6–8 (43%) 12–9 (57%) 96.8 -0.75 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
33 2002 1620 134.1 -0.60 -1.51 0.847 46.8% +33 +134 +147 35.1% -0.91 3–5 (38%) 3–7 (30%) 94.1 -2.76 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Career — 1984 152.3 +1.77 +0.70 1.047 50.8% -10 +32 +46 54.2% +0.27 114–123 (48%) 149–132 (53%) 98.5 -2.84 — 1789 136.0 +0.15 -1.61 0.935 48.8% -1 -51 -18 46.8% -0.21 41–47 (47%) 54–51 (51%) 103.1 +0.09

Career Rivalries

Each player's five most-played main-draw opponents. The current matchup is highlighted when it appears in a player's top five.