H2H data updated: 2026-07-19 13:16 UTC
Cedric Pioline vs Peter Wessels H2H: 2-0
Cedric Pioline holds a 2–0 lead over Peter Wessels in their ATP head-to-head. Across 2 main-draw meetings, Cedric Pioline leads 2–0 on hard courts. Most recently, Cedric Pioline won the 1999 US Open third round 7-6(5) 7-5 4-6 7-6(1).
Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.
FRA
Age 57
Right-Handed
188 cm / 6'2"
H2H
2
–
0
2 main draw meetings
NED
Age 48
Right-Handed
196 cm / 6'5"
H2H Match Log
| Date | Tournament | Category | Round | Surface | Winner | Score | Loser | Match |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Sep 5, 1999* | US Open | Grand Slam | R32 | Hard | Cedric Pioline | 7-6(5) 7-5 4-6 7-6(1) | Peter Wessels | Match data |
| Aug 27, 1997* | US Open | Grand Slam | R128 | Hard | Cedric Pioline | 6-4 6-2 6-2 | Peter Wessels | Match data |
* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.
Career Comparison
| Player | Current | Peak | Pts | Elo | W | L | Win % | GS | 1000 | Finals | 500 | 250 | Titles |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Cedric Pioline | #750 | #5 | 2,335 | 1,983 | 370 | 301 | 55.1% | 0 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 4 | 5 |
| Peter Wessels | #987 | #72 | 586 | 1,715 | 43 | 58 | 42.6% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 1 |
Career Progression by Age
Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.
| Age | Cedric Pioline | Peter Wessels | ||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | |
| 18 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1996 | 0–3 | 0.0% | #369 | 1,475 | 0 | 0 |
| 19 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1997 | 0–2 | 0.0% | #321 | 1,467 | 0 | 0 |
| 20 | 1989 | 0–3 | 0.0% | #202 | 1,483 | 0 | 0 | 1998 | 1–2 | 33.3% | #112 | 1,479 | 0 | 0 |
| 21 | 1990 | 5–12 | 29.4% | #118 | 1,484 | 0 | 0 | 1999 | 12–15 | 44.4% | #108 | 1,591 | 0 | 0 |
| 22 | 1991 | 21–20 | 51.2% | #51 | 1,664 | 0 | 0 | 2000 | 7–5 | 58.3% | #150 | 1,641 | 0 | 1 |
| 23 | 1992 | 31–27 | 53.4% | #33 | 1,845 | 0 | 0 | 2001 | 11–11 | 50.0% | #110 | 1,605 | 0 | 1 |
| 24 | 1993 | 51–27 | 65.4% | #10 | 1,936 | 0 | 0 | 2002 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #465 | 1,565 | 0 | 1 |
| 25 | 1994 | 29–28 | 50.9% | #51 | 1,767 | 0 | 0 | 2003 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #203 | 1,558 | 0 | 1 |
| 26 | 1995 | 24–27 | 47.1% | #54 | 1,760 | 0 | 0 | 2004 | 0–2 | 0.0% | #89 | 1,528 | 0 | 1 |
| 27 | 1996 | 38–21 | 64.4% | #21 | 1,805 | 0 | 1 | 2005 | 8–13 | 38.1% | #144 | 1,564 | 0 | 1 |
| 28 | 1997 | 37–25 | 59.7% | #20 | 1,834 | 0 | 2 | 2006 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #401 | 1,528 | 0 | 1 |
| 29 | 1998 | 38–26 | 59.4% | #18 | 1,764 | 0 | 2 | 2007 | 4–2 | 66.7% | #163 | 1,613 | 0 | 1 |
| 30 | 1999 | 37–28 | 56.9% | #13 | 1,795 | 0 | 3 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 31 | 2000 | 32–19 | 62.7% | #16 | 1,760 | 0 | 5 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 32 | 2001 | 17–22 | 43.6% | #84 | 1,657 | 0 | 5 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 33 | 2002 | 10–16 | 38.5% | #119 | 1,618 | 0 | 5 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |