H2H data updated: 2026-09-03 00:00 UTC

Cedric Pioline vs Peter Wessels H2H: 2-0

Cedric Pioline holds a 2–0 lead over Peter Wessels in their ATP head-to-head. Across 2 main-draw meetings, Cedric Pioline leads 2–0 on hard courts. Most recently, Cedric Pioline won the 1999 US Open round of 32 7-6(5) 7-5 4-6 7-6(1).

Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.

Cedric Pioline
FRA Age 57 Right-Handed 188 cm / 6'2"
H2H
2 – 0
2 main draw meetings
Peter Wessels
NED Age 48 Right-Handed 196 cm / 6'5"

H2H Match Log

PlayerScorePlayerMatch DataDateRoundTournamentCategorySurface
Cedric Pioline #26 7-6(5) 7-5 4-6 7-6(1) Peter Wessels #115 Match data Sep 5, 1999* R32 US Open Grand Slam Hard
Cedric Pioline #23 6-4 6-2 6-2 Peter Wessels #296 Match data Aug 27, 1997* R128 US Open Grand Slam Hard

Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable. Arrows show an edition's recorded category and documented modern equivalent; unresolved editions keep their recorded category. Asterisked totals include editions mapped from documented historical predecessor categories. Mapping details.

Career Comparison

Player Current Peak Pts Elo W L Win % GS 1000 including documented historical predecessor categories Finals 500 including documented historical predecessor categories 250 including documented historical predecessor categories Titles
Cedric Pioline #750 #5 2,335 1,984 370 301 55.1% 0 1 0 1 3 5
Peter Wessels #987 #72 586 1,714 43 58 42.6% 0 0 0 0 1 1

Career Progression by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.

Age Cedric Pioline Peter Wessels
YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles
18 — — — — — — — 1996 0–3 0.0% #369 1,475 0 0
19 — — — — — — — 1997 0–2 0.0% #321 1,467 0 0
20 1989 0–3 0.0% #202 1,482 0 0 1998 1–2 33.3% #112 1,479 0 0
21 1990 5–12 29.4% #118 1,484 0 0 1999 12–15 44.4% #108 1,591 0 0
22 1991 21–20 51.2% #51 1,664 0 0 2000 7–5 58.3% #150 1,641 0 1
23 1992 31–27 53.4% #33 1,849 0 0 2001 11–11 50.0% #110 1,604 0 1
24 1993 51–27 65.4% #10 1,936 0 0 2002 0–1 0.0% #465 1,564 0 1
25 1994 29–28 50.9% #51 1,768 0 0 2003 0–1 0.0% #203 1,557 0 1
26 1995 24–27 47.1% #54 1,761 0 0 2004 0–2 0.0% #89 1,526 0 1
27 1996 38–21 64.4% #21 1,808 0 1 2005 8–13 38.1% #144 1,563 0 1
28 1997 37–25 59.7% #20 1,831 0 2 2006 0–1 0.0% #401 1,527 0 1
29 1998 38–26 59.4% #18 1,765 0 2 2007 4–2 66.7% #163 1,613 0 1
30 1999 37–28 56.9% #13 1,796 0 3 — — — — — — —
31 2000 32–19 62.7% #16 1,763 0 5 — — — — — — —
32 2001 17–22 43.6% #84 1,658 0 5 — — — — — — —
33 2002 10–16 38.5% #119 1,619 0 5 — — — — — — —

Surface Results by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. Results cover completed main-draw matches. Bold green marks the higher win percentage when both players have at least 5 matches on that surface at the aligned age.

Age Cedric Pioline Peter Wessels
Yr HardClayGrassCarpet Yr HardClayGrassCarpet
W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win %
18 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 1996 — — — — 0 1 1 0.0% 0 1 1 0.0% 0 1 1 0.0%
19 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 1997 0 2 2 0.0% — — — — — — — — — — — —
20 1989 — — — — 0 3 3 0.0% — — — — — — — — 1998 — — — — — — — — 1 1 2 50.0% 0 1 1 0.0%
21 1990 0 1 1 0.0% 5 8 13 38.5% — — — — 0 3 3 0.0% 1999 10 8 18 55.6% 0 1 1 0.0% 2 4 6 33.3% 0 2 2 0.0%
22 1991 6 6 12 50.0% 11 9 20 55.0% 1 1 2 50.0% 3 4 7 42.9% 2000 1 4 5 20.0% — — — — 6 1 7 85.7% — — — —
23 1992 13 10 23 56.5% 9 10 19 47.4% 1 2 3 33.3% 8 5 13 61.5% 2001 6 6 12 50.0% 0 1 1 0.0% 5 4 9 55.6% — — — —
24 1993 19 9 28 67.9% 11 8 19 57.9% 8 3 11 72.7% 13 7 20 65.0% 2002 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — — — — — — — — —
25 1994 15 11 26 57.7% 6 6 12 50.0% 1 3 4 25.0% 7 8 15 46.7% 2003 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — — — — — — — — —
26 1995 8 10 18 44.4% 6 8 14 42.9% 5 3 8 62.5% 5 6 11 45.5% 2004 — — — — 0 1 1 0.0% 0 1 1 0.0% — — — —
27 1996 12 7 19 63.2% 11 5 16 68.8% 3 2 5 60.0% 12 7 19 63.2% 2005 6 8 14 42.9% 2 3 5 40.0% 0 1 1 0.0% 0 1 1 0.0%
28 1997 10 9 19 52.6% 13 7 20 65.0% 7 3 10 70.0% 7 6 13 53.8% 2006 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — — — — — — — — —
29 1998 15 13 28 53.6% 12 6 18 66.7% 1 2 3 33.3% 10 5 15 66.7% 2007 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — 4 1 5 80.0% — — — —
30 1999 20 16 36 55.6% 1 6 7 14.3% 12 2 14 85.7% 4 4 8 50.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
31 2000 16 10 26 61.5% 13 3 16 81.3% 3 3 6 50.0% 0 3 3 0.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
32 2001 8 11 19 42.1% 7 8 15 46.7% 2 2 4 50.0% 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
33 2002 4 5 9 44.4% 4 6 10 40.0% 2 3 5 40.0% 0 2 2 0.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Career — 146 118 264 55.3% 109 93 202 54.0% 46 29 75 61.3% 69 61 130 53.1% — 23 32 55 41.8% 2 7 9 22.2% 18 14 32 56.2% 0 5 5 0.0%

Performance Progression by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. Detailed serve and return statistics available for 560/651 of Cedric Pioline's and 95/101 of Peter Wessels's main draw matches. Sample is shown as matches with detailed serve and return statistics / total main draw matches. Bold green marks the stronger value when both stat samples contain at least 5 matches; lower is better for DFs/M.

Age Cedric Pioline Peter Wessels
Yr Sample Aces/M DFs/M 1st Sv% 1st Pts% 2nd Pts% BP Saved% BP Conv% Svc Pts% Ret Pts% Yr Sample Aces/M DFs/M 1st Sv% 1st Pts% 2nd Pts% BP Saved% BP Conv% Svc Pts% Ret Pts%
18 — —/— — — — — — — — — — 1996 3/3 8.3 3.0 61.5% 62.5% 32.4% 55.7% 61.1% 51.3% 34.7%
19 — —/— — — — — — — — — — 1997 2/2 10.0 2.0 60.1% 73.6% 38.5% 58.5% 0.0% 59.6% 17.6%
20 — —/— — — — — — — — — — 1998 1/3 12.0 4.0 61.3% 66.2% 53.5% 66.7% 100.0% 61.3% 21.1%
21 — —/— — — — — — — — — — 1999 27/27 9.5 4.6 61.2% 75.2% 49.1% 61.8% 39.6% 65.1% 33.9%
22 1991 40/41 3.5 3.4 59.0% 68.7% 51.3% 60.4% 46.4% 61.6% 38.4% 2000 11/12 10.4 2.3 66.2% 73.9% 57.2% 52.5% 42.9% 68.6% 31.6%
23 1992 53/58 5.8 3.7 57.0% 74.5% 46.4% 59.3% 41.4% 62.6% 36.9% 2001 19/22 9.0 3.5 59.8% 74.1% 53.4% 63.5% 51.5% 65.9% 34.5%
24 1993 68/78 5.7 3.0 59.8% 73.8% 52.0% 60.8% 40.6% 65.1% 39.4% 2002 1/1 4.0 9.0 57.5% 67.4% 44.1% 72.7% 50.0% 57.5% 30.6%
25 1994 44/57 4.5 3.3 60.1% 70.1% 48.9% 53.4% 42.1% 61.7% 39.9% 2003 1/1 4.0 4.0 47.4% 59.3% 33.3% 64.3% 50.0% 45.6% 31.1%
26 1995 44/51 4.9 3.8 57.9% 72.7% 48.2% 53.6% 37.8% 62.4% 37.6% 2004 2/2 4.0 3.0 67.0% 63.1% 28.0% 43.7% 25.0% 51.4% 34.9%
27 1996 53/59 6.0 3.2 55.9% 75.1% 51.7% 62.1% 44.4% 64.9% 39.6% 2005 21/21 8.0 2.5 65.9% 72.9% 49.9% 59.9% 30.0% 64.9% 32.2%
28 1997 51/62 5.9 3.5 60.9% 73.7% 51.1% 61.5% 42.4% 64.7% 38.6% 2006 1/1 3.0 3.0 55.4% 54.8% 28.0% 40.0% 60.0% 42.9% 37.7%
29 1998 56/64 5.4 3.3 58.6% 73.5% 50.4% 59.3% 47.1% 63.8% 38.3% 2007 6/6 12.0 2.7 65.6% 83.8% 56.3% 79.2% 46.6% 74.5% 34.8%
30 1999 54/65 6.0 4.6 54.4% 75.4% 49.2% 62.1% 42.4% 63.4% 36.2% — —/— — — — — — — — — —
31 2000 46/51 8.2 4.8 52.7% 78.8% 51.3% 60.8% 41.8% 65.5% 39.5% — —/— — — — — — — — — —
32 2001 31/39 8.3 4.6 52.5% 73.2% 51.4% 63.6% 40.7% 63.1% 36.9% — —/— — — — — — — — — —
33 2002 20/26 5.7 4.4 51.2% 71.3% 48.3% 45.7% 32.5% 60.3% 33.6% — —/— — — — — — — — — —
Career — 560/671 5.8 3.7 57.1% 73.7% 50.1% 59.3% 42.2% 63.5% 38.2% — 95/101 9.0 3.4 62.7% 73.6% 49.9% 61.0% 41.3% 64.8% 33.0%

Advanced Statistics Comparison by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. Metrics are precomputed from eligible main-draw results; point-stat values use the available detailed sample. Bold green marks the stronger value when both underlying samples are sufficient. Lower is better for Schedule because a negative value means a tougher schedule. Career Schedule is normalized per 100 matches.

Age Cedric Pioline Peter Wessels
Yr Elo P+ Serve+ Return+ PD TPW% Hard Elo Clay Elo Grass Elo Set Win % Set Margin Dec. Set Tiebreak Pressure+ Schedule Yr Elo P+ Serve+ Return+ PD TPW% Hard Elo Clay Elo Grass Elo Set Win % Set Margin Dec. Set Tiebreak Pressure+ Schedule
18 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 1996 1475 102.0 -0.08 -2.50 0.713 43.5% — — — 0.0% -2.83 — — — -0.11
19 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 1997 1467 105.2 -1.39 +2.61 0.437 40.9% — — — 0.0% -3.40 — — — -0.38
20 1989 1483 114.0 — — — — — +7 — 12.5% -1.88 0–1 — — -0.41 1998 1480 109.1 +1.72 +5.01 0.543 44.9% — — — 42.9% -0.28 0–1 0–3 (0%) — -0.10
21 1990 1484 124.4 — — — — +14 +43 — 34.9% -0.47 4–4 (50%) 2–5 (29%) — +0.10 1999 1591 118.8 +2.37 -3.00 0.971 49.5% +12 — -32 45.3% -0.21 6–6 (50%) 8–10 (44%) — +1.84
22 1991 1665 135.0 +1.05 -0.51 1.002 50.2% -79 -6 — 50.5% +0.06 8–8 (50%) 6–11 (35%) — -0.32 2000 1641 122.2 +2.17 -2.35 1.006 50.2% -75 — +51 54.2% +0.17 2–0 3–3 (50%) — +0.27
23 1992 1849 149.9 +1.29 -1.12 0.985 50.1% -31 -113 -257 52.3% +0.22 10–11 (48%) 10–13 (43%) — -1.91 2001 1605 120.2 +2.47 -1.70 1.013 50.4% -16 — +82 50.0% +0.06 2–3 (40%) 7–3 (70%) — +0.81
24 1993 1937 156.7 +3.18 +1.96 1.128 52.1% +8 -173 -173 60.8% +0.75 16–11 (59%) 19–19 (50%) — -4.16 2002 1564 101.9 +1.56 -0.70 0.721 45.8% — — — 0.0% -2.00 — 0–1 — -0.13
25 1994 1768 141.9 +0.19 +1.74 1.042 50.9% +34 -22 -59 51.3% +0.05 12–15 (44%) 11–8 (58%) — -0.27 2003 1557 102.3 -0.62 +1.54 0.572 39.2% — — — 0.0% -4.00 — — — -0.10
26 1995 1762 147.6 +1.13 +0.42 1.001 49.8% -23 +16 +10 50.8% -0.06 4–9 (31%) 12–7 (63%) — -3.16 2004 1527 100.6 -2.69 -2.56 0.718 43.4% — — — 20.0% -2.00 0–1 — — +0.05
27 1996 1809 154.8 +2.69 +2.35 1.129 52.1% -33 +87 +32 63.1% +0.93 8–8 (50%) 10–6 (63%) — -1.10 2005 1564 122.2 +1.32 -2.48 0.918 48.4% -13 -82 — 44.4% -0.24 1–4 (20%) 5–8 (38%) — +0.36
28 1997 1832 150.4 +2.57 +1.89 1.093 51.3% -28 +52 +117 57.1% +0.51 14–11 (56%) 9–10 (47%) — -2.00 2006 1528 99.1 -2.36 -1.00 0.660 40.2% — — — 0.0% -3.00 — — — -0.05
29 1998 1765 148.9 +1.69 +0.86 1.058 51.0% +5 +162 +116 56.6% +0.30 12–10 (55%) 15–14 (52%) — -0.97 2007 1613 113.3 +3.68 -0.01 1.362 53.2% — — +120 71.4% +0.93 0–2 4–3 (57%) — +0.38
30 1999 1797 143.0 +1.68 -0.71 0.989 50.0% -26 -11 +162 55.2% +0.07 9–13 (41%) 25–10 (71%) — -2.23 2008 1574 105.8 — — — — — — — — — — — — —
31 2000 1764 148.1 +2.89 +1.87 1.144 52.4% -10 +168 +138 60.6% +0.75 8–9 (47%) 15–13 (54%) — +0.89 2009 1554 99.2 — — — — — — — — — — — — —
32 2001 1658 131.9 +0.83 -1.42 0.999 50.1% +19 +151 +176 46.7% -0.27 6–8 (43%) 12–9 (57%) — -0.75 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
33 2002 1620 134.1 -0.60 -1.51 0.847 46.8% +33 +134 +147 35.1% -0.91 3–5 (38%) 3–7 (30%) — -2.76 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Career — 1984 152.3 +1.77 +0.70 1.047 50.8% -10 +32 +46 54.2% +0.27 114–123 (48%) 149–132 (53%) 98.5 -2.84 — 1714 121.4 +1.86 -2.04 0.937 49.0% -10 -82 +56 44.8% -0.29 11–17 (39%) 27–31 (47%) 99.5 +2.81

Career Rivalries

Each player's five most-played main-draw opponents. The current matchup is highlighted when it appears in a player's top five.