H2H data updated: 2026-09-04 00:00 UTC

Cedric Pioline vs Sargis Sargsian H2H: 1-1

Cedric Pioline and Sargis Sargsian are tied 1–1 in their ATP head-to-head. Across 2 main-draw meetings, Sargis Sargsian leads 1–0 on clay, while Cedric Pioline leads 1–0 on hard courts. Most recently, Sargis Sargsian won the 2001 Sopot round of 32 7-6(5) 6-1.

Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.

Cedric Pioline
FRA Age 57 Right-Handed 188 cm / 6'2"
H2H
1 – 1
2 main draw meetings
Sargis Sargsian
ARM Age 53 Right-Handed 180 cm / 5'11"

H2H Match Log

PlayerScorePlayerMatch DataDateRoundTournamentCategorySurface
Sargis Sargsian #104 7-6(5) 6-1 Cedric Pioline #68 Match data Jul 26, 2001* R32 Sopot ATP International Series → modern equivalent ATP 250 Clay
Cedric Pioline #10 6-3 6-3 6-1 Sargis Sargsian #71 Match data Aug 30, 2000* R128 US Open Grand Slam Hard

Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable. Arrows show an edition's recorded category and documented modern equivalent; unresolved editions keep their recorded category. Asterisked totals include editions mapped from documented historical predecessor categories. Mapping details.

Career Comparison

Player Current Peak Pts Elo W L Win % GS 1000 including documented historical predecessor categories Finals 500 including documented historical predecessor categories 250 including documented historical predecessor categories Titles
Cedric Pioline #750 #5 2,335 1,984 370 301 55.1% 0 1 0 1 3 5
Sargis Sargsian #1,525 #38 978 1,811 156 208 42.9% 0 0 0 0 1 1

Career Progression by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.

Age Cedric Pioline Sargis Sargsian
YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles
20 1989 0–3 0.0% #202 1,482 0 0 1993 1–1 50.0% #615 1,514 0 0
21 1990 5–12 29.4% #118 1,484 0 0 — — — — — — —
22 1991 21–20 51.2% #51 1,664 0 0 1995 2–2 50.0% #220 1,568 0 0
23 1992 31–27 53.4% #33 1,849 0 0 1996 4–6 40.0% #104 1,576 0 0
24 1993 51–27 65.4% #10 1,936 0 0 1997 18–23 43.9% #69 1,628 0 1
25 1994 29–28 50.9% #51 1,768 0 0 1998 18–25 41.9% #98 1,617 0 1
26 1995 24–27 47.1% #54 1,761 0 0 1999 21–23 47.7% #59 1,636 0 1
27 1996 38–21 64.4% #21 1,808 0 1 2000 15–26 36.6% #94 1,566 0 1
28 1997 37–25 59.7% #20 1,831 0 2 2001 16–19 45.7% #72 1,624 0 1
29 1998 38–26 59.4% #18 1,765 0 2 2002 13–19 40.6% #103 1,649 0 1
30 1999 37–28 56.9% #13 1,796 0 3 2003 28–26 51.9% #39 1,774 0 1
31 2000 32–19 62.7% #16 1,763 0 5 2004 17–27 38.6% #75 1,697 0 1
32 2001 17–22 43.6% #84 1,658 0 5 2005 3–9 25.0% #294 1,589 0 1
33 2002 10–16 38.5% #119 1,619 0 5 2006 0–2 0.0% #809 1,576 0 1

Surface Results by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. Results cover completed main-draw matches. Bold green marks the higher win percentage when both players have at least 5 matches on that surface at the aligned age.

Age Cedric Pioline Sargis Sargsian
Yr HardClayGrassCarpet Yr HardClayGrassCarpet
W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win %
20 1989 — — — — 0 3 3 0.0% — — — — — — — — 1993 1 1 2 50.0% — — — — — — — — — — — —
21 1990 0 1 1 0.0% 5 8 13 38.5% — — — — 0 3 3 0.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
22 1991 6 6 12 50.0% 11 9 20 55.0% 1 1 2 50.0% 3 4 7 42.9% 1995 2 2 4 50.0% — — — — — — — — — — — —
23 1992 13 10 23 56.5% 9 10 19 47.4% 1 2 3 33.3% 8 5 13 61.5% 1996 3 4 7 42.9% 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — 1 1 2 50.0%
24 1993 19 9 28 67.9% 11 8 19 57.9% 8 3 11 72.7% 13 7 20 65.0% 1997 8 11 19 42.1% 2 5 7 28.6% 6 3 9 66.7% 2 4 6 33.3%
25 1994 15 11 26 57.7% 6 6 12 50.0% 1 3 4 25.0% 7 8 15 46.7% 1998 6 13 19 31.6% 5 6 11 45.5% 6 4 10 60.0% 1 2 3 33.3%
26 1995 8 10 18 44.4% 6 8 14 42.9% 5 3 8 62.5% 5 6 11 45.5% 1999 4 8 12 33.3% 11 9 20 55.0% 5 4 9 55.6% 1 2 3 33.3%
27 1996 12 7 19 63.2% 11 5 16 68.8% 3 2 5 60.0% 12 7 19 63.2% 2000 6 12 18 33.3% 8 10 18 44.4% 1 3 4 25.0% 0 1 1 0.0%
28 1997 10 9 19 52.6% 13 7 20 65.0% 7 3 10 70.0% 7 6 13 53.8% 2001 7 10 17 41.2% 5 5 10 50.0% 4 4 8 50.0% — — — —
29 1998 15 13 28 53.6% 12 6 18 66.7% 1 2 3 33.3% 10 5 15 66.7% 2002 7 10 17 41.2% 2 5 7 28.6% 2 3 5 40.0% 2 1 3 66.7%
30 1999 20 16 36 55.6% 1 6 7 14.3% 12 2 14 85.7% 4 4 8 50.0% 2003 13 12 25 52.0% 9 10 19 47.4% 2 3 5 40.0% 4 1 5 80.0%
31 2000 16 10 26 61.5% 13 3 16 81.3% 3 3 6 50.0% 0 3 3 0.0% 2004 9 14 23 39.1% 2 5 7 28.6% 2 3 5 40.0% 4 5 9 44.4%
32 2001 8 11 19 42.1% 7 8 15 46.7% 2 2 4 50.0% 0 1 1 0.0% 2005 2 4 6 33.3% 1 2 3 33.3% 0 3 3 0.0% — — — —
33 2002 4 5 9 44.4% 4 6 10 40.0% 2 3 5 40.0% 0 2 2 0.0% 2006 0 2 2 0.0% — — — — — — — — — — — —
Career — 146 118 264 55.3% 109 93 202 54.0% 46 29 75 61.3% 69 61 130 53.1% — 68 103 171 39.8% 45 58 103 43.7% 28 30 58 48.3% 15 17 32 46.9%

Performance Progression by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. Detailed serve and return statistics available for 560/651 of Cedric Pioline's and 313/364 of Sargis Sargsian's main draw matches. Sample is shown as matches with detailed serve and return statistics / total main draw matches. Bold green marks the stronger value when both stat samples contain at least 5 matches; lower is better for DFs/M.

Age Cedric Pioline Sargis Sargsian
Yr Sample Aces/M DFs/M 1st Sv% 1st Pts% 2nd Pts% BP Saved% BP Conv% Svc Pts% Ret Pts% Yr Sample Aces/M DFs/M 1st Sv% 1st Pts% 2nd Pts% BP Saved% BP Conv% Svc Pts% Ret Pts%
20 — —/— — — — — — — — — — 1993 2/2 1.0 3.0 62.4% 56.6% 57.6% 68.3% 34.5% 57.6% 36.0%
22 1991 40/41 3.5 3.4 59.0% 68.7% 51.3% 60.4% 46.4% 61.6% 38.4% 1995 2/4 5.0 7.0 57.5% 78.7% 29.9% 46.7% 47.4% 58.4% 33.4%
23 1992 53/58 5.8 3.7 57.0% 74.5% 46.4% 59.3% 41.4% 62.6% 36.9% 1996 7/10 2.1 4.0 58.5% 69.3% 46.1% 51.7% 41.0% 60.0% 42.4%
24 1993 68/78 5.7 3.0 59.8% 73.8% 52.0% 60.8% 40.6% 65.1% 39.4% 1997 31/41 4.3 3.4 58.0% 66.1% 50.7% 54.6% 38.3% 59.6% 35.6%
25 1994 44/57 4.5 3.3 60.1% 70.1% 48.9% 53.4% 42.1% 61.7% 39.9% 1998 33/43 4.5 3.1 60.5% 71.0% 50.9% 61.1% 43.1% 63.0% 38.8%
26 1995 44/51 4.9 3.8 57.9% 72.7% 48.2% 53.6% 37.8% 62.4% 37.6% 1999 33/44 3.8 2.5 60.7% 70.1% 50.3% 68.4% 40.9% 62.0% 39.0%
27 1996 53/59 6.0 3.2 55.9% 75.1% 51.7% 62.1% 44.4% 64.9% 39.6% 2000 33/41 3.7 3.0 60.4% 66.5% 45.5% 55.1% 39.0% 58.0% 38.0%
28 1997 51/62 5.9 3.5 60.9% 73.7% 51.1% 61.5% 42.4% 64.7% 38.6% 2001 32/35 3.7 3.3 59.1% 68.7% 48.5% 54.0% 46.3% 60.2% 38.1%
29 1998 56/64 5.4 3.3 58.6% 73.5% 50.4% 59.3% 47.1% 63.8% 38.3% 2002 29/32 5.0 3.2 56.7% 67.3% 49.4% 51.7% 39.2% 59.6% 34.2%
30 1999 54/65 6.0 4.6 54.4% 75.4% 49.2% 62.1% 42.4% 63.4% 36.2% 2003 54/54 4.1 3.4 61.7% 69.5% 51.8% 57.0% 47.3% 62.8% 39.6%
31 2000 46/51 8.2 4.8 52.7% 78.8% 51.3% 60.8% 41.8% 65.5% 39.5% 2004 43/44 4.8 3.0 63.2% 67.8% 48.6% 52.9% 33.9% 60.3% 36.8%
32 2001 31/39 8.3 4.6 52.5% 73.2% 51.4% 63.6% 40.7% 63.1% 36.9% 2005 12/12 3.0 4.3 59.9% 56.7% 37.4% 46.5% 49.0% 48.7% 30.9%
33 2002 20/26 5.7 4.4 51.2% 71.3% 48.3% 45.7% 32.5% 60.3% 33.6% 2006 2/2 0.5 6.5 60.0% 56.3% 39.5% 57.7% 16.7% 49.5% 28.9%
Career — 560/671 5.8 3.7 57.1% 73.7% 50.1% 59.3% 42.2% 63.5% 38.2% — 313/364 4.1 3.2 60.3% 67.9% 48.9% 56.3% 41.4% 60.3% 37.5%

Advanced Statistics Comparison by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. Metrics are precomputed from eligible main-draw results; point-stat values use the available detailed sample. Bold green marks the stronger value when both underlying samples are sufficient. Lower is better for Schedule because a negative value means a tougher schedule. Career Schedule is normalized per 100 matches.

Age Cedric Pioline Sargis Sargsian
Yr Elo P+ Serve+ Return+ PD TPW% Hard Elo Clay Elo Grass Elo Set Win % Set Margin Dec. Set Tiebreak Pressure+ Schedule Yr Elo P+ Serve+ Return+ PD TPW% Hard Elo Clay Elo Grass Elo Set Win % Set Margin Dec. Set Tiebreak Pressure+ Schedule
20 1989 1483 114.0 — — — — — +7 — 12.5% -1.88 0–1 — — -0.41 1993 1514 106.3 -1.99 -0.78 0.850 47.7% — — — 40.0% -0.20 1–0 1–1 — -0.04
21 1990 1484 124.4 — — — — +14 +43 — 34.9% -0.47 4–4 (50%) 2–5 (29%) — +0.10 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
22 1991 1665 135.0 +1.05 -0.51 1.002 50.2% -79 -6 — 50.5% +0.06 8–8 (50%) 6–11 (35%) — -0.32 1995 1568 112.7 -0.77 +0.75 0.802 46.7% +23 — — 40.0% -0.73 2–0 1–0 — -0.16
23 1992 1849 149.9 +1.29 -1.12 0.985 50.1% -31 -113 -257 52.3% +0.22 10–11 (48%) 10–13 (43%) — -1.91 1996 1577 128.3 -1.13 +3.09 1.060 51.0% +44 — — 45.5% 0.00 0–2 0–2 — +0.38
24 1993 1937 156.7 +3.18 +1.96 1.128 52.1% +8 -173 -173 60.8% +0.75 16–11 (59%) 19–19 (50%) — -4.16 1997 1628 125.8 -1.73 -0.98 0.881 47.6% -2 -131 +80 42.7% -0.72 7–9 (44%) 10–6 (63%) — -0.39
25 1994 1768 141.9 +0.19 +1.74 1.042 50.9% +34 -22 -59 51.3% +0.05 12–15 (44%) 11–8 (58%) — -0.27 1998 1618 121.9 +0.65 +0.48 1.050 50.9% -61 -75 +114 46.4% -0.07 6–11 (35%) 8–12 (40%) — +1.49
26 1995 1762 147.6 +1.13 +0.42 1.001 49.8% -23 +16 +10 50.8% -0.06 4–9 (31%) 12–7 (63%) — -3.16 1999 1637 132.5 +0.09 +1.23 1.029 50.7% -86 +41 +71 49.1% -0.06 5–10 (33%) 9–8 (53%) — -0.70
27 1996 1809 154.8 +2.69 +2.35 1.129 52.1% -33 +87 +32 63.1% +0.93 8–8 (50%) 10–6 (63%) — -1.10 2000 1566 128.7 -2.68 +0.64 0.906 47.9% -40 +100 +90 37.0% -0.66 5–8 (38%) 5–4 (56%) — +1.47
28 1997 1832 150.4 +2.57 +1.89 1.093 51.3% -28 +52 +117 57.1% +0.51 14–11 (56%) 9–10 (47%) — -2.00 2001 1625 130.0 -2.01 +0.60 0.956 49.3% -63 +51 +50 46.7% -0.18 5–7 (42%) 5–4 (56%) — +0.20
29 1998 1765 148.9 +1.69 +0.86 1.058 51.0% +5 +162 +116 56.6% +0.30 12–10 (55%) 15–14 (52%) — -0.97 2002 1650 127.4 -1.35 -1.75 0.846 47.0% -4 -26 -15 41.7% -0.71 5–5 (50%) 8–6 (57%) — -0.86
30 1999 1797 143.0 +1.68 -0.71 0.989 50.0% -26 -11 +162 55.2% +0.07 9–13 (41%) 25–10 (71%) — -2.23 2003 1775 142.7 +1.40 +2.44 1.066 51.2% -3 -112 -142 53.7% +0.49 4–6 (40%) 4–8 (33%) — -1.63
31 2000 1764 148.1 +2.89 +1.87 1.144 52.4% -10 +168 +138 60.6% +0.75 8–9 (47%) 15–13 (54%) — +0.89 2004 1697 135.9 -1.71 +0.83 0.929 48.5% +25 -58 -94 40.7% -0.52 8–6 (57%) 8–6 (57%) — -2.22
32 2001 1658 131.9 +0.83 -1.42 0.999 50.1% +19 +151 +176 46.7% -0.27 6–8 (43%) 12–9 (57%) — -0.75 2005 1589 91.9 -8.24 -4.38 0.602 40.3% +84 +23 -61 22.2% -2.26 1–0 1–2 (33%) — +0.23
33 2002 1620 134.1 -0.60 -1.51 0.847 46.8% +33 +134 +147 35.1% -0.91 3–5 (38%) 3–7 (30%) — -2.76 2006 1577 106.8 -0.31 -1.11 0.571 39.8% — — — 0.0% -3.75 — — — -0.39
Career — 1984 152.3 +1.77 +0.70 1.047 50.8% -10 +32 +46 54.2% +0.27 114–123 (48%) 149–132 (53%) 98.5 -2.84 — 1812 135.5 -1.06 +0.48 0.943 48.9% -15 -12 +31 44.2% -0.34 49–64 (43%) 60–59 (50%) 99.6 -0.72

Career Rivalries

Each player's five most-played main-draw opponents. The current matchup is highlighted when it appears in a player's top five.