H2H data updated: 2026-07-18 02:15 UTC
Cedric Pioline vs Sargis Sargsian H2H: 1-1
Cedric Pioline and Sargis Sargsian are tied 1–1 in their ATP head-to-head. Across 2 main-draw meetings, Sargis Sargsian leads 1–0 on clay, while Cedric Pioline leads 1–0 on hard courts. Most recently, Sargis Sargsian won the 2001 Sopot third round 7-6(5) 6-1.
Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.
FRA
Age 57
Right-Handed
188 cm / 6'2"
H2H
1
–
1
2 main draw meetings
ARM
Age 53
Right-Handed
180 cm / 5'11"
H2H Match Log
| Date | Tournament | Category | Round | Surface | Winner | Score | Loser | Match |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Jul 26, 2001* | Sopot | ATP 250 | R32 | Clay | Sargis Sargsian | 7-6(5) 6-1 | Cedric Pioline | Match data |
| Aug 30, 2000* | US Open | Grand Slam | R128 | Hard | Cedric Pioline | 6-3 6-3 6-1 | Sargis Sargsian | Match data |
* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.
Career Comparison
| Player | Current | Peak | Pts | Elo | W | L | Win % | GS | 1000 | Finals | 500 | 250 | Titles |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Cedric Pioline | #750 | #5 | 2,335 | 1,983 | 370 | 301 | 55.1% | 0 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 4 | 5 |
| Sargis Sargsian | #1,525 | #38 | 978 | 1,811 | 155 | 205 | 43.1% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 1 |
Career Progression by Age
Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.
| Age | Cedric Pioline | Sargis Sargsian | ||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | |
| 20 | 1989 | 0–3 | 0.0% | #202 | 1,483 | 0 | 0 | 1993 | 1–1 | 50.0% | #615 | 1,514 | 0 | 0 |
| 21 | 1990 | 5–12 | 29.4% | #118 | 1,484 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 22 | 1991 | 21–20 | 51.2% | #51 | 1,664 | 0 | 0 | 1995 | 2–2 | 50.0% | #220 | 1,568 | 0 | 0 |
| 23 | 1992 | 31–27 | 53.4% | #33 | 1,845 | 0 | 0 | 1996 | 3–5 | 37.5% | #104 | 1,569 | 0 | 0 |
| 24 | 1993 | 51–27 | 65.4% | #10 | 1,936 | 0 | 0 | 1997 | 18–23 | 43.9% | #69 | 1,674 | 0 | 1 |
| 25 | 1994 | 29–28 | 50.9% | #51 | 1,767 | 0 | 0 | 1998 | 18–25 | 41.9% | #98 | 1,623 | 0 | 1 |
| 26 | 1995 | 24–27 | 47.1% | #54 | 1,760 | 0 | 0 | 1999 | 21–23 | 47.7% | #59 | 1,637 | 0 | 1 |
| 27 | 1996 | 38–21 | 64.4% | #21 | 1,805 | 0 | 1 | 2000 | 15–25 | 37.5% | #94 | 1,584 | 0 | 1 |
| 28 | 1997 | 37–25 | 59.7% | #20 | 1,834 | 0 | 2 | 2001 | 16–19 | 45.7% | #72 | 1,628 | 0 | 1 |
| 29 | 1998 | 38–26 | 59.4% | #18 | 1,764 | 0 | 2 | 2002 | 13–19 | 40.6% | #103 | 1,650 | 0 | 1 |
| 30 | 1999 | 37–28 | 56.9% | #13 | 1,795 | 0 | 3 | 2003 | 28–26 | 51.9% | #39 | 1,774 | 0 | 1 |
| 31 | 2000 | 32–19 | 62.7% | #16 | 1,760 | 0 | 5 | 2004 | 17–26 | 39.5% | #75 | 1,699 | 0 | 1 |
| 32 | 2001 | 17–22 | 43.6% | #84 | 1,657 | 0 | 5 | 2005 | 3–9 | 25.0% | #294 | 1,588 | 0 | 1 |
| 33 | 2002 | 10–16 | 38.5% | #119 | 1,618 | 0 | 5 | 2006 | 0–2 | 0.0% | #809 | 1,576 | 0 | 1 |