H2H data updated: 2026-09-05 00:00 UTC

Cedric Pioline vs Thomas Johansson H2H: 0-1

Thomas Johansson holds a 1–0 lead over Cedric Pioline in their ATP head-to-head. Across 1 main-draw meeting, Thomas Johansson leads 1–0 on hard courts. Most recently, Thomas Johansson won the 2001 Stockholm Open round of 16 6-1 5-7 6-3.

Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.

Cedric Pioline
FRA Age 57 Right-Handed 188 cm / 6'2"
H2H
0 – 1
1 main draw meetings
Thomas Johansson
SWE Age 51 Right-Handed 180 cm / 5'11"

H2H Match Log

PlayerScorePlayerMatch DataDateRoundTournamentCategorySurface
Thomas Johansson #18 6-1 5-7 6-3 Cedric Pioline #88 Match data Oct 26, 2001* R16 Stockholm Open ATP International Series → modern equivalent ATP 250 Hard

Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable. Arrows show an edition's recorded category and documented modern equivalent; unresolved editions keep their recorded category. Asterisked totals include editions mapped from documented historical predecessor categories. Mapping details.

Career Comparison

Player Current Peak Pts Elo W L Win % GS 1000 including documented historical predecessor categories Finals 500 including documented historical predecessor categories 250 including documented historical predecessor categories Titles
Cedric Pioline #750 #5 2,335 1,984 370 301 55.1% 0 1 0 1 3 5
Thomas Johansson #586 #7 2,365 1,969 337 279 54.7% 1 1 0 0 7 9

Career Progression by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.

Age Cedric Pioline Thomas Johansson
YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles
18 — — — — — — — 1993 2–1 66.7% — 1,534 0 0
19 — — — — — — — 1994 0–2 0.0% #486 1,496 0 0
20 1989 0–3 0.0% #202 1,482 0 0 1995 1–3 25.0% #117 1,491 0 0
21 1990 5–12 29.4% #118 1,484 0 0 1996 28–21 57.1% #60 1,763 0 0
22 1991 21–20 51.2% #51 1,664 0 0 1997 32–27 54.2% #39 1,700 0 2
23 1992 31–27 53.4% #33 1,849 0 0 1998 46–30 60.5% #17 1,897 0 2
24 1993 51–27 65.4% #10 1,936 0 0 1999 21–23 47.7% #39 1,736 0 3
25 1994 29–28 50.9% #51 1,768 0 0 2000 22–26 45.8% #39 1,819 0 4
26 1995 24–27 47.1% #54 1,761 0 0 2001 42–23 64.6% #18 1,875 0 6
27 1996 38–21 64.4% #21 1,808 0 1 2002 26–22 54.2% #14 1,745 1 7
28 1997 37–25 59.7% #20 1,831 0 2 — — — — — — —
29 1998 38–26 59.4% #18 1,765 0 2 2004 29–20 59.2% #30 1,853 1 8
30 1999 37–28 56.9% #13 1,796 0 3 2005 42–24 63.6% #13 1,892 1 9
31 2000 32–19 62.7% #16 1,763 0 5 2006 11–16 40.7% #71 1,706 1 9
32 2001 17–22 43.6% #84 1,658 0 5 2007 23–23 50.0% #62 1,756 1 9
33 2002 10–16 38.5% #119 1,619 0 5 2008 12–18 40.0% #136 1,668 1 9

Surface Results by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. Results cover completed main-draw matches. Bold green marks the higher win percentage when both players have at least 5 matches on that surface at the aligned age.

Age Cedric Pioline Thomas Johansson
Yr HardClayGrassCarpet Yr HardClayGrassCarpet
W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win %
18 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 1993 — — — — — — — — — — — — 2 1 3 66.7%
19 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 1994 0 1 1 0.0% 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — — — — —
20 1989 — — — — 0 3 3 0.0% — — — — — — — — 1995 0 1 1 0.0% 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — 1 1 2 50.0%
21 1990 0 1 1 0.0% 5 8 13 38.5% — — — — 0 3 3 0.0% 1996 13 10 23 56.5% 4 5 9 44.4% 4 2 6 66.7% 7 4 11 63.6%
22 1991 6 6 12 50.0% 11 9 20 55.0% 1 1 2 50.0% 3 4 7 42.9% 1997 15 13 28 53.6% 1 6 7 14.3% 1 3 4 25.0% 15 5 20 75.0%
23 1992 13 10 23 56.5% 9 10 19 47.4% 1 2 3 33.3% 8 5 13 61.5% 1998 27 14 41 65.9% 3 6 9 33.3% 5 3 8 62.5% 11 7 18 61.1%
24 1993 19 9 28 67.9% 11 8 19 57.9% 8 3 11 72.7% 13 7 20 65.0% 1999 16 14 30 53.3% 1 5 6 16.7% 1 1 2 50.0% 3 3 6 50.0%
25 1994 15 11 26 57.7% 6 6 12 50.0% 1 3 4 25.0% 7 8 15 46.7% 2000 17 17 34 50.0% 1 5 6 16.7% 3 3 6 50.0% 1 1 2 50.0%
26 1995 8 10 18 44.4% 6 8 14 42.9% 5 3 8 62.5% 5 6 11 45.5% 2001 23 15 38 60.5% 4 5 9 44.4% 11 1 12 91.7% 4 2 6 66.7%
27 1996 12 7 19 63.2% 11 5 16 68.8% 3 2 5 60.0% 12 7 19 63.2% 2002 17 12 29 58.6% 5 5 10 50.0% 2 2 4 50.0% 2 3 5 40.0%
28 1997 10 9 19 52.6% 13 7 20 65.0% 7 3 10 70.0% 7 6 13 53.8% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
29 1998 15 13 28 53.6% 12 6 18 66.7% 1 2 3 33.3% 10 5 15 66.7% 2004 19 12 31 61.3% 1 2 3 33.3% 6 3 9 66.7% 3 3 6 50.0%
30 1999 20 16 36 55.6% 1 6 7 14.3% 12 2 14 85.7% 4 4 8 50.0% 2005 19 14 33 57.6% 4 5 9 44.4% 10 3 13 76.9% 9 2 11 81.8%
31 2000 16 10 26 61.5% 13 3 16 81.3% 3 3 6 50.0% 0 3 3 0.0% 2006 5 7 12 41.7% 1 4 5 20.0% 0 3 3 0.0% 5 2 7 71.4%
32 2001 8 11 19 42.1% 7 8 15 46.7% 2 2 4 50.0% 0 1 1 0.0% 2007 18 13 31 58.1% 3 5 8 37.5% 0 3 3 0.0% 2 2 4 50.0%
33 2002 4 5 9 44.4% 4 6 10 40.0% 2 3 5 40.0% 0 2 2 0.0% 2008 8 12 20 40.0% 1 3 4 25.0% 3 3 6 50.0% — — — —
Career — 146 118 264 55.3% 109 93 202 54.0% 46 29 75 61.3% 69 61 130 53.1% — 197 155 352 56.0% 29 58 87 33.3% 46 30 76 60.5% 65 36 101 64.4%

Performance Progression by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. Detailed serve and return statistics available for 560/651 of Cedric Pioline's and 214/218 of Thomas Johansson's main draw matches. Sample is shown as matches with detailed serve and return statistics / total main draw matches. Bold green marks the stronger value when both stat samples contain at least 5 matches; lower is better for DFs/M.

Age Cedric Pioline Thomas Johansson
Yr Sample Aces/M DFs/M 1st Sv% 1st Pts% 2nd Pts% BP Saved% BP Conv% Svc Pts% Ret Pts% Yr Sample Aces/M DFs/M 1st Sv% 1st Pts% 2nd Pts% BP Saved% BP Conv% Svc Pts% Ret Pts%
22 1991 40/41 3.5 3.4 59.0% 68.7% 51.3% 60.4% 46.4% 61.6% 38.4% — —/— — — — — — — — — —
23 1992 53/58 5.8 3.7 57.0% 74.5% 46.4% 59.3% 41.4% 62.6% 36.9% — —/— — — — — — — — — —
24 1993 68/78 5.7 3.0 59.8% 73.8% 52.0% 60.8% 40.6% 65.1% 39.4% — —/— — — — — — — — — —
25 1994 44/57 4.5 3.3 60.1% 70.1% 48.9% 53.4% 42.1% 61.7% 39.9% — —/— — — — — — — — — —
26 1995 44/51 4.9 3.8 57.9% 72.7% 48.2% 53.6% 37.8% 62.4% 37.6% — —/— — — — — — — — — —
27 1996 53/59 6.0 3.2 55.9% 75.1% 51.7% 62.1% 44.4% 64.9% 39.6% — —/— — — — — — — — — —
28 1997 51/62 5.9 3.5 60.9% 73.7% 51.1% 61.5% 42.4% 64.7% 38.6% — —/— — — — — — — — — —
29 1998 56/64 5.4 3.3 58.6% 73.5% 50.4% 59.3% 47.1% 63.8% 38.3% 2004 49/49 9.3 2.1 55.5% 77.2% 52.5% 62.8% 42.3% 66.2% 36.3%
30 1999 54/65 6.0 4.6 54.4% 75.4% 49.2% 62.1% 42.4% 63.4% 36.2% 2005 66/66 8.9 2.0 56.8% 77.3% 55.7% 59.6% 40.9% 68.0% 36.5%
31 2000 46/51 8.2 4.8 52.7% 78.8% 51.3% 60.8% 41.8% 65.5% 39.5% 2006 26/27 10.2 2.8 56.6% 75.4% 50.5% 61.8% 40.1% 64.6% 33.3%
32 2001 31/39 8.3 4.6 52.5% 73.2% 51.4% 63.6% 40.7% 63.1% 36.9% 2007 46/46 8.4 2.5 57.6% 74.9% 51.6% 60.3% 42.1% 65.1% 32.1%
33 2002 20/26 5.7 4.4 51.2% 71.3% 48.3% 45.7% 32.5% 60.3% 33.6% 2008 27/30 7.4 2.8 58.4% 72.2% 47.4% 60.8% 38.1% 61.8% 33.5%
Career — 560/671 5.8 3.7 57.1% 73.7% 50.1% 59.3% 42.2% 63.5% 38.2% — 214/616 8.9 2.3 56.9% 75.9% 52.4% 60.9% 41.0% 65.8% 34.7%

Advanced Statistics Comparison by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. Metrics are precomputed from eligible main-draw results; point-stat values use the available detailed sample. Bold green marks the stronger value when both underlying samples are sufficient. Lower is better for Schedule because a negative value means a tougher schedule. Career Schedule is normalized per 100 matches.

Age Cedric Pioline Thomas Johansson
Yr Elo P+ Serve+ Return+ PD TPW% Hard Elo Clay Elo Grass Elo Set Win % Set Margin Dec. Set Tiebreak Pressure+ Schedule Yr Elo P+ Serve+ Return+ PD TPW% Hard Elo Clay Elo Grass Elo Set Win % Set Margin Dec. Set Tiebreak Pressure+ Schedule
18 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 1993 1535 112.9 — — — — +33 — — 62.5% +0.63 1–1 3–2 (60%) — +0.12
19 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 1994 1496 98.1 — — — — — — — 28.6% -1.14 0–1 1–1 — +0.29
20 1989 1483 114.0 — — — — — +7 — 12.5% -1.88 0–1 — — -0.41 1995 1492 111.1 — — — — +52 — — 22.2% -1.56 — 0–1 — -0.10
21 1990 1484 124.4 — — — — +14 +43 — 34.9% -0.47 4–4 (50%) 2–5 (29%) 100.1 +0.10 1996 1764 141.3 — — — — -11 -212 -55 54.7% +0.46 10–7 (59%) 5–8 (38%) 103.6 +0.21
22 1991 1665 135.0 +1.05 -0.51 1.002 50.2% -79 -6 — 50.5% +0.06 8–8 (50%) 6–11 (35%) 101.5 -0.32 1997 1700 139.6 — — — — +91 -202 -7 52.7% +0.37 11–10 (52%) 3–17 (15%) 91.8 +2.54
23 1992 1849 149.9 +1.29 -1.12 0.985 50.1% -31 -113 -257 52.3% +0.22 10–11 (48%) 10–13 (43%) 101.4 -1.91 1998 1897 149.9 — — — — +15 -423 -194 57.3% +0.51 12–13 (48%) 22–20 (52%) 98.8 -1.44
24 1993 1937 156.7 +3.18 +1.96 1.128 52.1% +8 -173 -173 60.8% +0.75 16–11 (59%) 19–19 (50%) 100.8 -4.16 1999 1736 138.9 — — — — +44 -276 — 50.9% -0.01 9–9 (50%) 8–8 (50%) 99.5 +1.29
25 1994 1768 141.9 +0.19 +1.74 1.042 50.9% +34 -22 -59 51.3% +0.05 12–15 (44%) 11–8 (58%) 94.5 -0.27 2000 1819 138.5 — — — — -4 -362 -90 50.0% +0.02 5–7 (42%) 17–12 (59%) 100.3 -0.07
26 1995 1762 147.6 +1.13 +0.42 1.001 49.8% -23 +16 +10 50.8% -0.06 4–9 (31%) 12–7 (63%) 100.1 -3.16 2001 1875 151.0 — — — — -19 -371 -11 61.5% +0.73 9–9 (50%) 15–12 (56%) 102.6 -2.47
27 1996 1809 154.8 +2.69 +2.35 1.129 52.1% -33 +87 +32 63.1% +0.93 8–8 (50%) 10–6 (63%) 101.9 -1.10 2002 1746 143.8 — — — — +68 -189 +40 53.6% +0.32 8–8 (50%) 11–12 (48%) 97.6 -0.26
28 1997 1832 150.4 +2.57 +1.89 1.093 51.3% -28 +52 +117 57.1% +0.51 14–11 (56%) 9–10 (47%) 100.8 -2.00 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
29 1998 1765 148.9 +1.69 +0.86 1.058 51.0% +5 +162 +116 56.6% +0.30 12–10 (55%) 15–14 (52%) 96.7 -0.97 2004 1854 148.2 +3.00 +0.83 1.073 51.2% +2 -283 +23 56.9% +0.25 8–8 (50%) 18–11 (62%) 104.6 -2.69
30 1999 1797 143.0 +1.68 -0.71 0.989 50.0% -26 -11 +162 55.2% +0.07 9–13 (41%) 25–10 (71%) 101.1 -2.23 2005 1893 147.3 +4.53 -0.04 1.141 52.0% -3 -302 +122 61.8% +0.69 10–8 (56%) 22–15 (59%) 103.3 +0.08
31 2000 1764 148.1 +2.89 +1.87 1.144 52.4% -10 +168 +138 60.6% +0.75 8–9 (47%) 15–13 (54%) 99.3 +0.89 2006 1706 134.4 +1.47 -2.65 0.941 49.2% +107 -165 +193 41.4% -0.30 4–5 (44%) 7–12 (37%) 92.2 +0.60
32 2001 1658 131.9 +0.83 -1.42 0.999 50.1% +19 +151 +176 46.7% -0.27 6–8 (43%) 12–9 (57%) 96.8 -0.75 2007 1757 138.7 +0.88 -2.95 0.918 48.8% +47 -210 +10 45.9% -0.46 7–5 (58%) 14–13 (52%) 101.2 -2.55
33 2002 1620 134.1 -0.60 -1.51 0.847 46.8% +33 +134 +147 35.1% -0.91 3–5 (38%) 3–7 (30%) 94.1 -2.76 2008 1668 132.9 -0.51 -1.77 0.876 47.7% +18 -129 +90 34.8% -0.74 4–2 (67%) 5–9 (36%) 98.1 -1.34
34 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2009 1652 102.9 — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Career — 1984 152.3 +1.77 +0.70 1.047 50.8% -10 +32 +46 54.2% +0.27 114–123 (48%) 149–132 (53%) 98.5 -2.84 — 1969 149.0 +2.39 -1.00 1.014 50.2% +27 -268 +7 53.4% +0.24 98–93 (51%) 151–153 (50%) 99.5 -0.95

Career Rivalries

Each player's five most-played main-draw opponents. The current matchup is highlighted when it appears in a player's top five.