H2H data updated: 2026-07-18 02:15 UTC
Cedric Pioline vs Vladimir Voltchkov H2H: 0-1
Vladimir Voltchkov holds a 1–0 lead over Cedric Pioline in their ATP head-to-head. Across 1 main-draw meeting, Vladimir Voltchkov leads 1–0 on grass. Most recently, Vladimir Voltchkov won the 2000 Wimbledon second round 6-3 6-3 2-6 3-6 6-4.
Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.
FRA
Age 57
Right-Handed
188 cm / 6'2"
H2H
0
–
1
1 main draw meetings
BLR
Right-Handed
180 cm / 5'11"
H2H Match Log
| Date | Tournament | Category | Round | Surface | Winner | Score | Loser | Match |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Jun 30, 2000* | Wimbledon | Grand Slam | R64 | Grass | Vladimir Voltchkov | 6-3 6-3 2-6 3-6 6-4 | Cedric Pioline | Match data |
* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.
Career Comparison
| Player | Current | Peak | Pts | Elo | W | L | Win % | GS | 1000 | Finals | 500 | 250 | Titles |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Cedric Pioline | #750 | #5 | 2,335 | 1,983 | 370 | 301 | 55.1% | 0 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 4 | 5 |
| Vladimir Voltchkov | #1,605 | #25 | 1,108 | 1,784 | 50 | 68 | 42.4% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
Career Progression by Age
Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.
| Cedric Pioline | Vladimir Voltchkov | ||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles |
| 1989 | 0–3 | 0.0% | #202 | 1,483 | 0 | 0 | 1995 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #668 | 1,495 | 0 | 0 |
| 1990 | 5–12 | 29.4% | #118 | 1,484 | 0 | 0 | 1997 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #277 | 1,485 | 0 | 0 |
| 1991 | 21–20 | 51.2% | #51 | 1,664 | 0 | 0 | 1998 | 3–3 | 50.0% | #162 | 1,538 | 0 | 0 |
| 1992 | 31–27 | 53.4% | #33 | 1,845 | 0 | 0 | 1999 | 0–5 | 0.0% | #174 | 1,460 | 0 | 0 |
| 1993 | 51–27 | 65.4% | #10 | 1,936 | 0 | 0 | 2000 | 13–7 | 65.0% | #46 | 1,732 | 0 | 0 |
| 1994 | 29–28 | 50.9% | #51 | 1,767 | 0 | 0 | 2001 | 13–24 | 35.1% | #99 | 1,569 | 0 | 0 |
| 1995 | 24–27 | 47.1% | #54 | 1,760 | 0 | 0 | 2002 | 9–6 | 60.0% | #73 | 1,673 | 0 | 0 |
| 1996 | 38–21 | 64.4% | #21 | 1,805 | 0 | 1 | 2003 | 10–16 | 38.5% | #120 | 1,570 | 0 | 0 |
| 1997 | 37–25 | 59.7% | #20 | 1,834 | 0 | 2 | 2004 | 2–3 | 40.0% | #192 | 1,613 | 0 | 0 |
| 1998 | 38–26 | 59.4% | #18 | 1,764 | 0 | 2 | 2005 | 0–2 | 0.0% | #223 | 1,568 | 0 | 0 |
| 1999 | 37–28 | 56.9% | #13 | 1,795 | 0 | 3 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 2000 | 32–19 | 62.7% | #16 | 1,760 | 0 | 5 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 2001 | 17–22 | 43.6% | #84 | 1,657 | 0 | 5 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 2002 | 10–16 | 38.5% | #119 | 1,618 | 0 | 5 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |