H2H data updated: 2026-07-19 14:15 UTC
Charlie Pasarell vs Jaime Pinto Bravo H2H: 2-0
Charlie Pasarell holds a 2–0 lead over Jaime Pinto Bravo in their ATP head-to-head. Across 2 main-draw meetings, Charlie Pasarell leads 1–0 on clay and 1–0 on grass. Most recently, Charlie Pasarell won the 1969 Haverford fourth round 7-5 6-4.
Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.
USA
Age 82
Right-Handed
185 cm / 6'1"
H2H
2
–
0
2 main draw meetings
CHI
Age 86
H2H Match Log
| Date | Tournament | Category | Round | Surface | Winner | Score | Loser | Match |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Aug 15, 1969* | Haverford | ATP 250 | R16 | Grass | Charlie Pasarell | 7-5 6-4 | Jaime Pinto Bravo | Match data |
| Jul 11, 1969* | Washington | ATP 250 | R16 | Clay | Charlie Pasarell | 9-7 3-6 6-2 | Jaime Pinto Bravo | Match data |
* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.
Career Comparison
| Player | Current | Peak | Pts | Elo | W | L | Win % | GS | 1000 | Finals | 500 | 250 | Titles |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Charlie Pasarell | #312 | #35 | 0 | 1,939 | 302 | 275 | 52.3% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 4 | 4 |
| Jaime Pinto Bravo | — | — | — | 1,625 | — | — | — | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
Career Progression by Age
Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.
| Age | Charlie Pasarell | Jaime Pinto Bravo | ||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | |
| 24 | 1968 | 38–18 | 67.9% | — | 1,650 | 0 | 1 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 25 | 1969 | 43–31 | 58.1% | — | 1,668 | 0 | 1 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 26 | 1970 | 27–22 | 55.1% | — | 1,749 | 0 | 1 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 27 | 1971 | 26–32 | 44.8% | — | 1,801 | 0 | 1 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 28 | 1972 | 35–27 | 56.5% | — | 1,840 | 0 | 2 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 29 | 1973 | 40–31 | 56.3% | #47 | 1,834 | 0 | 3 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 30 | 1974 | 29–26 | 52.7% | #51 | 1,768 | 0 | 4 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 31 | 1975 | 22–25 | 46.8% | #63 | 1,715 | 0 | 4 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 32 | 1976 | 24–25 | 49.0% | #56 | 1,815 | 0 | 4 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 33 | 1977 | 13–21 | 38.2% | #71 | 1,650 | 0 | 4 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 34 | 1978 | 4–10 | 28.6% | #200 | 1,607 | 0 | 4 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 35 | 1979 | 1–7 | 12.5% | #312 | 1,563 | 0 | 4 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |