H2H data updated: 2026-07-19 08:25 UTC
Charlie Pasarell vs Jim Mcmanus H2H: 0-3
Jim Mcmanus holds a 3–0 lead over Charlie Pasarell in their ATP head-to-head. Across 3 main-draw meetings, Jim Mcmanus leads 2–0 on hard courts and 1–0 on grass. Most recently, Jim Mcmanus won the 1972 Los Angeles Wct second round 4-6 6-3 7-6.
Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.
USA
Age 82
Right-Handed
185 cm / 6'1"
H2H
0
–
3
3 main draw meetings
USA
Left-Handed
175 cm / 5'9"
H2H Match Log
| Date | Tournament | Category | Round | Surface | Winner | Score | Loser | Match |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Sep 20, 1972* | Los Angeles Wct | ATP 250 | R64 | Hard | Jim Mcmanus | 4-6 6-3 7-6 | Charlie Pasarell | Match data |
| Sep 22, 1969* | Los Angeles | ATP 250 | R64 | Hard | Jim Mcmanus | 6-1 6-2 | Charlie Pasarell | Match data |
| Jun 15, 1968* | Bristol | ATP 250 | QF | Grass | Jim Mcmanus | 6-4 3-6 8-6 | Charlie Pasarell | Match data |
* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.
Career Comparison
| Player | Current | Peak | Pts | Elo | W | L | Win % | GS | 1000 | Finals | 500 | 250 | Titles |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Charlie Pasarell | #312 | #35 | 0 | 1,939 | 302 | 275 | 52.3% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 4 | 4 |
| Jim Mcmanus | #418 | #90 | 0 | 1,730 | 132 | 222 | 37.3% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
Career Progression by Age
Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.
| Age | Charlie Pasarell | Jim Mcmanus | ||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | |
| 24 | 1968 | 38–18 | 67.9% | — | 1,650 | 0 | 1 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 25 | 1969 | 43–31 | 58.1% | — | 1,668 | 0 | 1 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 26 | 1970 | 27–22 | 55.1% | — | 1,749 | 0 | 1 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 27 | 1971 | 26–32 | 44.8% | — | 1,801 | 0 | 1 | 1968 | 34–20 | 63.0% | — | 1,660 | 0 | 0 |
| 28 | 1972 | 35–27 | 56.5% | — | 1,840 | 0 | 2 | 1969 | 15–22 | 40.5% | — | 1,593 | 0 | 0 |
| 29 | 1973 | 40–31 | 56.3% | #47 | 1,834 | 0 | 3 | 1970 | 29–34 | 46.0% | — | 1,559 | 0 | 0 |
| 30 | 1974 | 29–26 | 52.7% | #51 | 1,768 | 0 | 4 | 1971 | 14–27 | 34.1% | — | 1,501 | 0 | 0 |
| 31 | 1975 | 22–25 | 46.8% | #63 | 1,715 | 0 | 4 | 1972 | 14–26 | 35.0% | — | 1,592 | 0 | 0 |
| 32 | 1976 | 24–25 | 49.0% | #56 | 1,815 | 0 | 4 | 1973 | 16–32 | 33.3% | #95 | 1,564 | 0 | 0 |
| 33 | 1977 | 13–21 | 38.2% | #71 | 1,650 | 0 | 4 | 1974 | 4–22 | 15.4% | #132 | 1,431 | 0 | 0 |
| 34 | 1978 | 4–10 | 28.6% | #200 | 1,607 | 0 | 4 | 1975 | 5–17 | 22.7% | #152 | 1,476 | 0 | 0 |
| 35 | 1979 | 1–7 | 12.5% | #312 | 1,563 | 0 | 4 | 1976 | 1–17 | 5.6% | #192 | 1,391 | 0 | 0 |
| 36 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1977 | 0–2 | 0.0% | #332 | 1,371 | 0 | 0 |
| 37 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1978 | 0–3 | 0.0% | #418 | 1,348 | 0 | 0 |