H2H data updated: 2026-09-09 00:00 UTC

Charlie Pasarell vs Nikola Pilic H2H: 2-5

Nikola Pilic holds a 5–2 lead over Charlie Pasarell in their ATP head-to-head. Across 7 main-draw meetings, Charlie Pasarell leads 2–1 on carpet, while Nikola Pilic leads 2–0 on hard courts. Most recently, Charlie Pasarell won the 1971 Bologna Wct round of 32 UNK.

Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.

Charlie Pasarell
USA Age 82 Right-Handed 185 cm / 6'1"
H2H
2 – 5
7 main-draw meetings
Nikola Pilic
CRO Left-Handed 191 cm / 6'3"

H2H Match Log

PlayerScorePlayerMatch DataDateRoundTournamentCategorySurface
Charlie Pasarell UNK Nikola Pilic Match data Nov 17, 1971* R32 Bologna Wct ATP 250 Carpet
Nikola Pilic 7-5 6-2 Charlie Pasarell Match data Sep 30, 1971* R32 Berkeley ATP 250 Hard
Nikola Pilic 6-5 Charlie Pasarell Match data Apr 21, 1971 RR Denver ATP 250 Carpet
Nikola Pilic 6-3 7-5 Charlie Pasarell Match data Nov 29, 1969* QF Stockholm Open ATP 250 Hard
Nikola Pilic 6-2 6-1 6-4 Charlie Pasarell Match data May 1, 1969* R32 Bournemouth ATP 250 Clay
Charlie Pasarell 6-2 6-3 Nikola Pilic Match data Feb 9, 1969* R16 Philadelphia Wct ATP 250 Carpet
Nikola Pilic 6-4 9-7 4-6 6-4 Charlie Pasarell Match data Sep 4, 1968* R32 US Open Grand Slam Grass

Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable. Arrows show an edition's recorded category and documented modern equivalent; unresolved editions keep their recorded category. Asterisked totals include editions mapped from documented historical predecessor categories. Mapping details.

Career Comparison

Player Current Peak Pts Elo W L Win % GS 1000 including documented historical predecessor categories Finals 500 including documented historical predecessor categories 250 including documented historical predecessor categories Titles
Charlie Pasarell #312 #35 0 1,936 300 273 52.4% 0 0 0 0 4 4
Nikola Pilic #284 #12 0 1,950 301 249 54.7% 0 0 0 0 5 5

Career Progression by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.

Age Charlie Pasarell Nikola Pilic
YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles
24 1968 38–18 67.9% — 1,645 0 1 — — — — — — —
25 1969 43–31 58.1% — 1,666 0 1 — — — — — — —
26 1970 27–22 55.1% — 1,748 0 1 — — — — — — —
27 1971 26–32 44.8% — 1,797 0 1 — — — — — — —
28 1972 35–27 56.5% — 1,840 0 2 1968 42–46 47.7% — 1,636 0 0
29 1973 40–31 56.3% #47 1,838 0 3 1969 27–24 52.9% — 1,767 0 1
30 1974 29–25 53.7% #51 1,777 0 4 1970 47–31 60.3% — 1,887 0 2
31 1975 20–24 45.5% #63 1,724 0 4 1971 39–31 55.7% — 1,842 0 3
32 1976 24–25 49.0% #56 1,816 0 4 1972 34–28 54.8% — 1,891 0 4
33 1977 13–21 38.2% #64 1,651 0 4 1973 44–27 62.0% #15 1,841 0 4
34 1978 4–10 28.6% #200 1,608 0 4 1974 22–12 64.7% #32 1,904 0 4
35 1979 1–7 12.5% #312 1,565 0 4 1975 20–15 57.1% #50 1,871 0 5
36 — — — — — — — 1976 13–14 48.1% #68 1,752 0 5
37 — — — — — — — 1977 11–14 44.0% #82 1,697 0 5
38 — — — — — — — 1978 2–7 22.2% #284 1,620 0 5

Surface Results by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. Results cover completed main-draw matches. Bold green marks the higher win percentage when both players have at least 5 matches on that surface at the aligned age.

Age Charlie Pasarell Nikola Pilic
Yr HardClayGrassCarpet Yr HardClayGrassCarpet
W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win %
24 1968 12 8 20 60.0% 6 2 8 75.0% 19 7 26 73.1% 1 1 2 50.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
25 1969 9 11 20 45.0% 12 8 20 60.0% 18 7 25 72.0% 4 5 9 44.4% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
26 1970 14 10 24 58.3% 5 6 11 45.5% 7 3 10 70.0% 1 3 4 25.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
27 1971 6 8 14 42.9% 4 8 12 33.3% 4 5 9 44.4% 12 11 23 52.2% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
28 1972 6 7 13 46.2% 4 5 9 44.4% 2 1 3 66.7% 23 14 37 62.2% 1968 7 11 18 38.9% 9 6 15 60.0% 10 9 19 52.6% 16 20 36 44.4%
29 1973 22 12 34 64.7% 10 8 18 55.6% 4 3 7 57.1% 4 8 12 33.3% 1969 6 4 10 60.0% 9 10 19 47.4% 9 6 15 60.0% 3 4 7 42.9%
30 1974 12 10 22 54.5% 8 8 16 50.0% 3 3 6 50.0% 6 4 10 60.0% 1970 5 6 11 45.5% 17 7 24 70.8% 20 11 31 64.5% 5 7 12 41.7%
31 1975 4 10 14 28.6% 3 6 9 33.3% 3 2 5 60.0% 10 6 16 62.5% 1971 13 7 20 65.0% 7 10 17 41.2% 10 4 14 71.4% 9 10 19 47.4%
32 1976 3 3 6 50.0% 5 7 12 41.7% 6 3 9 66.7% 10 12 22 45.5% 1972 11 9 20 55.0% 6 5 11 54.5% 2 1 3 66.7% 15 13 28 53.6%
33 1977 4 9 13 30.8% 0 2 2 0.0% 7 3 10 70.0% 2 7 9 22.2% 1973 3 5 8 37.5% 26 13 39 66.7% 4 1 5 80.0% 11 8 19 57.9%
34 1978 0 4 4 0.0% — — — — — — — — 4 6 10 40.0% 1974 2 2 4 50.0% 0 1 1 0.0% 2 1 3 66.7% 18 8 26 69.2%
35 1979 1 3 4 25.0% — — — — 0 3 3 0.0% 0 1 1 0.0% 1975 — — — — 14 7 21 66.7% 0 1 1 0.0% 6 7 13 46.2%
36 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 1976 0 1 1 0.0% 7 10 17 41.2% 5 2 7 71.4% 1 1 2 50.0%
37 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 1977 1 1 2 50.0% 8 10 18 44.4% 2 1 3 66.7% 0 2 2 0.0%
38 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 1978 — — — — 2 7 9 22.2% — — — — — — — —
Career — 93 95 188 49.5% 57 60 117 48.7% 73 40 113 64.6% 77 78 155 49.7% — 48 46 94 51.1% 105 86 191 55.0% 64 37 101 63.4% 84 80 164 51.2%

Advanced Statistics Comparison by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. Metrics use eligible main-draw results; point statistics use matches with detailed data. Bold green marks the stronger value when both underlying samples are sufficient. Lower is better for Schedule because a negative value means a tougher schedule. Career Schedule is normalized per 100 matches.

Age Charlie Pasarell Nikola Pilic
Yr Elo P+ Serve+ Return+ PD TPW% Hard Elo Clay Elo Grass Elo Set Win % Set Margin Dec. Set Tiebreak Pressure+ Schedule Yr Elo P+ Serve+ Return+ PD TPW% Hard Elo Clay Elo Grass Elo Set Win % Set Margin Dec. Set Tiebreak Pressure+ Schedule
24 1968 1645 122.0 — — — — -31 -45 +74 63.9% +1.00 8–7 (53%) — — +1.25 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
25 1969 1667 126.1 — — — — -58 +4 +169 57.1% +0.41 14–11 (56%) — — -0.43 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
26 1970 1749 125.6 — — — — +24 -135 +109 53.9% +0.30 5–7 (42%) 2–1 (67%) 99.1 +1.72 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
27 1971 1798 137.7 — — — — +40 -225 +19 42.3% -0.75 5–4 (56%) 9–5 (64%) 105.2 -5.48 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
28 1972 1840 149.9 — — — — +40 -212 -15 53.0% +0.32 15–10 (60%) 10–9 (53%) 106.6 -3.30 1968 1636 111.3 — — — — -151 -16 -31 47.3% -0.36 10–12 (45%) — — -1.40
29 1973 1839 142.4 — — — — +26 -116 -35 54.6% +0.32 12–16 (43%) 18–12 (60%) 99.5 -4.93 1969 1768 124.1 — — — — -72 -209 -64 53.7% +0.31 8–9 (47%) 1–0 — -0.25
30 1974 1777 132.4 — — — — +36 -54 +43 47.4% +0.07 19–5 (79%) 11–16 (41%) 105.6 -2.92 1970 1888 148.2 — — — — -193 -47 +36 58.2% +0.88 14–13 (52%) 5–4 (56%) 105.5 -3.73
31 1975 1725 136.7 — — — — -3 -12 +86 46.5% -0.03 5–5 (50%) 5–10 (33%) 93.7 -3.25 1971 1842 144.2 — — — — -18 -83 +111 58.7% +0.69 8–5 (62%) 12–13 (48%) 102.1 -3.57
32 1976 1817 147.5 — — — — -43 -131 +88 50.0% +0.03 7–8 (47%) 6–7 (46%) 100.0 -3.12 1972 1892 147.9 — — — — -16 -78 +46 53.5% +0.29 7–7 (50%) 16–18 (47%) 98.7 -5.81
33 1977 1651 131.0 — — — — -42 — +267 43.5% -0.38 3–8 (27%) 8–8 (50%) 94.0 -0.96 1973 1841 145.7 — — — — -61 +43 +119 60.6% +0.80 10–8 (56%) 15–13 (54%) 98.1 -3.46
34 1978 1609 117.4 — — — — -33 — — 29.0% -1.35 2–1 (67%) 3–4 (43%) 102.3 +0.47 1974 1905 139.1 — — — — -6 — +73 56.0% +0.54 11–3 (79%) 5–8 (38%) 105.7 -1.39
35 1979 1566 110.1 — — — — -32 — +281 23.8% -2.19 0–1 3–0 (100%) — -1.01 1975 1872 141.0 — — — — -39 +45 — 57.6% +0.42 7–6 (54%) 4–3 (57%) 99.8 -0.41
36 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 1976 1752 126.4 — — — — +23 +27 +201 49.3% -0.20 4–3 (57%) 2–5 (29%) 95.6 -0.01
37 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 1977 1698 136.2 — — — — +16 +18 +284 48.4% +0.05 6–5 (55%) 2–5 (29%) 96.7 -0.64
38 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 1978 1620 117.9 — — — — — +18 — 34.6% -0.54 1–3 (25%) 1–4 (20%) 95.2 +0.12
Career — 1937 139.9 — — — — +4 -96 +107 51.2% +0.11 95–83 (53%) 75–72 (51%) 102.9 -3.89 — 1950 142.6 — — — — -68 -21 +43 54.6% +0.39 86–74 (54%) 63–73 (46%) 98.1 -3.78

Career Rivalries

Each player's five most-played main-draw opponents. The current matchup is highlighted when it appears in a player's top five.