H2H data updated: 2026-09-01 00:00 UTC

Charlie Pasarell vs Ray Keldie H2H: 3-0

Charlie Pasarell holds a 3–0 lead over Ray Keldie in their ATP head-to-head. Across 3 main-draw meetings, Charlie Pasarell leads 2–0 on clay and 1–0 on hard courts. Most recently, Charlie Pasarell won the 1970 San Juan round of 32 6-2 9-7.

USA Age 82 Right-Handed 185 cm / 6'1"
H2H
3 0
3 main draw meetings
AUS Age 80 Right-Handed

H2H Match Log

PlayerScorePlayerMatch DataDateRoundTournamentCategorySurface
Charlie Pasarell 6-2 9-7 Ray Keldie Match data Apr 1, 1970* R32 San Juan ATP 250 Hard
Charlie Pasarell 8-6 6-8 6-2 Ray Keldie Match data Jul 23, 1969* R64 Indianapolis ATP 250 Clay
Charlie Pasarell 6-3 6-3 Ray Keldie Match data Jul 17, 1969* R32 Cincinnati Open ATP 250 Clay

Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable. Arrows show an edition's recorded category and documented modern equivalent; unresolved editions keep their recorded category. Asterisked totals include editions mapped from documented historical predecessor categories. Mapping details.

Career Comparison

Player Current Peak Pts Elo W L Win % GS 1000 including documented historical predecessor categories Finals 500 including documented historical predecessor categories 250 including documented historical predecessor categories Titles
Charlie Pasarell #312 #35 0 1,936 300 273 52.4% 0 0 0 0 4 4
Ray Keldie #190 #113 0 1,622 64 106 37.6% 0 0 0 0 0 0

Career Progression by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.

Age Charlie Pasarell Ray Keldie
YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles
22 1968 3–9 25.0% 1,380 0 0
23 1969 11–17 39.3% 1,475 0 0
24 1968 38–18 67.9% 1,645 0 1 1970 11–23 32.4% 1,489 0 0
25 1969 43–31 58.1% 1,666 0 1 1971 12–20 37.5% 1,557 0 0
26 1970 27–22 55.1% 1,748 0 1 1972 8–6 57.1% 1,572 0 0
27 1971 26–32 44.8% 1,797 0 1 1973 9–8 52.9% #190 1,586 0 0
28 1972 35–27 56.5% 1,840 0 2 1974 9–18 33.3% #136 1,506 0 0
29 1973 40–31 56.3% #47 1,838 0 3 1975 1–5 16.7% #218 1,487 0 0
30 1974 29–25 53.7% #51 1,777 0 4
31 1975 20–24 45.5% #63 1,724 0 4
32 1976 24–25 49.0% #56 1,816 0 4
33 1977 13–21 38.2% #64 1,651 0 4
34 1978 4–10 28.6% #200 1,608 0 4
35 1979 1–7 12.5% #312 1,565 0 4

Surface Results by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. Results cover completed main-draw matches. Bold green marks the higher win percentage when both players have at least 5 matches on that surface at the aligned age.

Age Charlie Pasarell Ray Keldie
Yr HardClayGrassCarpet Yr HardClayGrassCarpet
W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win %
22 1968 0 1 1 0.0% 1 5 6 16.7% 2 3 5 40.0%
23 1969 1 2 3 33.3% 5 5 10 50.0% 5 10 15 33.3%
24 1968 12 8 20 60.0% 6 2 8 75.0% 19 7 26 73.1% 1 1 2 50.0% 1970 4 10 14 28.6% 5 7 12 41.7% 2 6 8 25.0%
25 1969 9 11 20 45.0% 12 8 20 60.0% 18 7 25 72.0% 4 5 9 44.4% 1971 2 9 11 18.2% 2 3 5 40.0% 8 7 15 53.3% 0 1 1 0.0%
26 1970 14 10 24 58.3% 5 6 11 45.5% 7 3 10 70.0% 1 3 4 25.0% 1972 8 6 14 57.1%
27 1971 6 8 14 42.9% 4 8 12 33.3% 4 5 9 44.4% 12 11 23 52.2% 1973 2 1 3 66.7% 1 2 3 33.3% 6 5 11 54.5%
28 1972 6 7 13 46.2% 4 5 9 44.4% 2 1 3 66.7% 23 14 37 62.2% 1974 0 2 2 0.0% 1 9 10 10.0% 8 6 14 57.1% 0 1 1 0.0%
29 1973 22 12 34 64.7% 10 8 18 55.6% 4 3 7 57.1% 4 8 12 33.3% 1975 1 3 4 25.0% 0 2 2 0.0%
30 1974 12 10 22 54.5% 8 8 16 50.0% 3 3 6 50.0% 6 4 10 60.0%
31 1975 4 10 14 28.6% 3 6 9 33.3% 3 2 5 60.0% 10 6 16 62.5%
32 1976 3 3 6 50.0% 5 7 12 41.7% 6 3 9 66.7% 10 12 22 45.5%
33 1977 4 9 13 30.8% 0 2 2 0.0% 7 3 10 70.0% 2 7 9 22.2%
34 1978 0 4 4 0.0% 4 6 10 40.0%
35 1979 1 3 4 25.0% 0 3 3 0.0% 0 1 1 0.0%
Career 93 95 188 49.5% 57 60 117 48.7% 73 40 113 64.6% 77 78 155 49.7% 10 28 38 26.3% 15 31 46 32.6% 39 45 84 46.4% 0 2 2 0.0%

Advanced Statistics Comparison by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. Metrics are precomputed from eligible main-draw results; point-stat values use the available detailed sample. Bold green marks the stronger value when both underlying samples are sufficient. Lower is better for Schedule because a negative value means a tougher schedule. Career Schedule is normalized per 100 matches.

Age Charlie Pasarell Ray Keldie
Yr Elo P+ Serve+ Return+ PD TPW% Hard Elo Clay Elo Grass Elo Set Win % Set Margin Dec. Set Tiebreak Pressure+ Schedule Yr Elo P+ Serve+ Return+ PD TPW% Hard Elo Clay Elo Grass Elo Set Win % Set Margin Dec. Set Tiebreak Pressure+ Schedule
22 1968 1381 90.5 +17 +109 27.0% -1.32 2–0 +1.10
23 1969 1476 106.3 +43 -23 +15 41.2% -0.53 1–4 (20%) +0.44
24 1968 1645 122.0 -31 -45 +74 63.9% +1.00 8–7 (53%) +1.25 1970 1489 113.3 +11 -38 -31 39.0% -0.73 1–8 (11%) 4–3 (57%) +0.67
25 1969 1667 126.1 -59 +4 +169 57.1% +0.41 14–11 (56%) -0.43 1971 1558 117.8 -139 -90 +5 43.2% -0.41 2–8 (20%) 3–2 (60%) +0.56
26 1970 1749 125.6 +24 -135 +109 53.9% +0.30 5–7 (42%) 2–1 (67%) +1.73 1972 1572 118.6 +24 57.6% +0.49 2–2 (50%) +0.36
27 1971 1798 137.7 +40 -225 +19 42.3% -0.75 5–4 (56%) 9–5 (64%) -5.46 1973 1587 108.6 -98 -102 +22 51.2% +0.14 2–3 (40%) 1–0 +1.48
28 1972 1840 149.9 +40 -212 -15 53.0% +0.32 15–10 (60%) 10–9 (53%) -3.30 1974 1507 110.1 -65 -99 +137 40.3% -0.87 6–9 (40%) 5–2 (71%) +1.59
29 1973 1839 142.4 +26 -115 -35 54.6% +0.32 12–16 (43%) 18–12 (60%) -4.92 1975 1488 105.1 -46 21.4% -2.07 1–1 +0.19
30 1974 1777 132.4 +36 -54 +43 47.4% +0.07 19–5 (79%) 11–16 (41%) -2.91
31 1975 1725 136.7 -3 -12 +86 46.5% -0.03 5–5 (50%) 5–10 (33%) -3.25
32 1976 1817 147.5 -43 -130 +88 50.0% +0.03 7–8 (47%) 6–7 (46%) -3.12
33 1977 1651 131.1 -42 +267 43.5% -0.38 3–8 (27%) 8–8 (50%) -0.96
34 1978 1609 117.4 -33 29.0% -1.35 2–1 (67%) 3–4 (43%) +0.47
35 1979 1566 110.1 -32 +281 23.8% -2.19 0–1 3–0 (100%) -1.01
Career 1937 139.9 +4 -95 +107 51.2% +0.11 95–83 (53%) 75–72 (51%) 102.9 -3.88 1623 113.3 -53 -51 +38 41.4% -0.57 16–34 (32%) 14–8 (64%) 96.8 +3.85

Career Rivalries

Each player's five most-played main-draw opponents. The current matchup is highlighted when it appears in a player's top five.