H2H data updated: 2026-07-17 14:15 UTC
Charlie Pasarell vs William Brown H2H: 3-0
Charlie Pasarell holds a 3–0 lead over William Brown in their ATP head-to-head. Across 3 main-draw meetings, Charlie Pasarell leads 2–0 on clay and 1–0 on grass. Most recently, Charlie Pasarell won the 1973 Tokyo third round 6-3 6-4.
Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.
USA
Age 82
Right-Handed
185 cm / 6'1"
H2H
3
–
0
3 main draw meetings
USA
Age 81
Right-Handed
H2H Match Log
| Date | Tournament | Category | Round | Surface | Winner | Score | Loser | Match |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Oct 11, 1973* | Tokyo | ATP 250 | R32 | Clay | Charlie Pasarell | 6-3 6-4 | William Brown | Match data |
| Jul 9, 1969* | Washington | ATP 250 | R64 | Clay | Charlie Pasarell | 6-1 6-2 | William Brown | Match data |
| Aug 1, 1968* | South Orange | ATP 250 | R32 | Grass | Charlie Pasarell | 6-2 4-6 6-1 | William Brown | Match data |
* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.
Career Comparison
| Player | Current | Peak | Pts | Elo | W | L | Win % | GS | 1000 | Finals | 500 | 250 | Titles |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Charlie Pasarell | #312 | #35 | 0 | 1,939 | 302 | 275 | 52.3% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 4 | 4 |
| William Brown | #436 | #86 | 0 | 1,552 | 28 | 82 | 25.5% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
Career Progression by Age
Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.
| Age | Charlie Pasarell | William Brown | ||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | |
| 23 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1968 | 2–6 | 25.0% | — | 1,444 | 0 | 0 |
| 24 | 1968 | 38–18 | 67.9% | — | 1,650 | 0 | 1 | 1969 | 2–5 | 28.6% | — | 1,451 | 0 | 0 |
| 25 | 1969 | 43–31 | 58.1% | — | 1,668 | 0 | 1 | 1970 | 1–7 | 12.5% | — | 1,426 | 0 | 0 |
| 26 | 1970 | 27–22 | 55.1% | — | 1,749 | 0 | 1 | 1971 | 1–6 | 14.3% | — | 1,411 | 0 | 0 |
| 27 | 1971 | 26–32 | 44.8% | — | 1,801 | 0 | 1 | 1972 | 3–8 | 27.3% | — | 1,436 | 0 | 0 |
| 28 | 1972 | 35–27 | 56.5% | — | 1,840 | 0 | 2 | 1973 | 2–12 | 14.3% | #224 | 1,399 | 0 | 0 |
| 29 | 1973 | 40–31 | 56.3% | #47 | 1,834 | 0 | 3 | 1974 | 11–19 | 36.7% | #86 | 1,546 | 0 | 0 |
| 30 | 1974 | 29–26 | 52.7% | #51 | 1,768 | 0 | 4 | 1975 | 5–17 | 22.7% | #165 | 1,482 | 0 | 0 |
| 31 | 1975 | 22–25 | 46.8% | #63 | 1,715 | 0 | 4 | 1976 | 1–1 | 50.0% | #239 | 1,508 | 0 | 0 |
| 32 | 1976 | 24–25 | 49.0% | #56 | 1,815 | 0 | 4 | 1977 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #414 | 1,489 | 0 | 0 |
| 33 | 1977 | 13–21 | 38.2% | #71 | 1,650 | 0 | 4 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 34 | 1978 | 4–10 | 28.6% | #200 | 1,607 | 0 | 4 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 35 | 1979 | 1–7 | 12.5% | #312 | 1,563 | 0 | 4 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |