H2H data updated: 2026-07-18 17:48 UTC
Chip Hooper vs Craig A Miller H2H: 1-0
Chip Hooper holds a 1–0 lead over Craig A Miller in their ATP head-to-head. Across 1 main-draw meeting, Chip Hooper leads 1–0 on hard courts. Most recently, Chip Hooper won the 1984 Auckland third round 6-4 7-6.
Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.
USA
Age 67
Right-Handed
198 cm / 6'6"
H2H
1
–
0
1 main draw meetings
AUS
Right-Handed
188 cm / 6'2"
H2H Match Log
| Date | Tournament | Category | Round | Surface | Winner | Score | Loser | Match |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Jan 12, 1984* | Auckland | ATP 250 | R32 | Hard | Chip Hooper | 6-4 7-6 | Craig A Miller | Match data |
* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.
Career Comparison
| Player | Current | Peak | Pts | Elo | W | L | Win % | GS | 1000 | Finals | 500 | 250 | Titles |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Chip Hooper | #1,046 | #17 | 0 | 1,854 | 104 | 119 | 46.6% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Craig A Miller | #1,057 | #102 | 0 | 1,571 | 26 | 53 | 32.9% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
Career Progression by Age
Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.
| Age | Chip Hooper | Craig A Miller | ||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | |
| 16 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1979 | 1–1 | 50.0% | #662 | 1,516 | 0 | 0 |
| 17 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1980 | 1–2 | 33.3% | #232 | 1,518 | 0 | 0 |
| 18 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1981 | 2–6 | 25.0% | #232 | 1,487 | 0 | 0 |
| 19 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1982 | 11–11 | 50.0% | #251 | 1,559 | 0 | 0 |
| 20 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1983 | 3–12 | 20.0% | #102 | 1,458 | 0 | 0 |
| 21 | 1980 | 1–2 | 33.3% | #390 | 1,500 | 0 | 0 | 1984 | 2–9 | 18.2% | #192 | 1,410 | 0 | 0 |
| 22 | 1981 | 2–4 | 33.3% | #390 | 1,538 | 0 | 0 | 1985 | 2–7 | 22.2% | #221 | 1,409 | 0 | 0 |
| 23 | 1982 | 34–24 | 58.6% | #32 | 1,766 | 0 | 0 | 1986 | 2–2 | 50.0% | #262 | 1,446 | 0 | 0 |
| 24 | 1983 | 24–24 | 50.0% | #59 | 1,739 | 0 | 0 | 1987 | 2–2 | 50.0% | #243 | 1,470 | 0 | 0 |
| 25 | 1984 | 18–21 | 46.2% | #96 | 1,600 | 0 | 0 | 1988 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #1054 | 1,448 | 0 | 0 |
| 26 | 1985 | 14–18 | 43.8% | #114 | 1,676 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 27 | 1986 | 5–12 | 29.4% | #222 | 1,577 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 28 | 1987 | 6–11 | 35.3% | #150 | 1,552 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 29 | 1988 | 0–3 | 0.0% | #561 | 1,506 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |