H2H data updated: 2026-07-19 02:51 UTC
Chip Hooper vs Jay Lapidus H2H: 1-2
Jay Lapidus holds a 2–1 lead over Chip Hooper in their ATP head-to-head. Across 3 main-draw meetings, Jay Lapidus leads 2–0 on hard courts, while Chip Hooper leads 1–0 on grass. Most recently, Jay Lapidus won the 1982 Basel fourth round 6-3 6-0.
Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.
USA
Age 67
Right-Handed
198 cm / 6'6"
H2H
1
–
2
3 main draw meetings
USA
Age 67
Left-Handed
188 cm / 6'2"
H2H Match Log
| Date | Tournament | Category | Round | Surface | Winner | Score | Loser | Match |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Oct 15, 1982* | Basel | ATP 250 | R16 | Hard | Jay Lapidus | 6-3 6-0 | Chip Hooper | Match data |
| Jun 10, 1982* | Queen's Club | ATP 250 | R32 | Grass | Chip Hooper | 6-4 4-6 6-1 | Jay Lapidus | Match data |
| Apr 29, 1982* | Tampa | ATP 250 | R32 | Hard | Jay Lapidus | 4-6 7-6 6-4 | Chip Hooper | Match data |
* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.
Career Comparison
| Player | Current | Peak | Pts | Elo | W | L | Win % | GS | 1000 | Finals | 500 | 250 | Titles |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Chip Hooper | #1,046 | #17 | 0 | 1,854 | 104 | 119 | 46.6% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Jay Lapidus | #621 | #34 | 0 | 1,798 | 76 | 106 | 41.8% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 1 |
Career Progression by Age
Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.
| Age | Chip Hooper | Jay Lapidus | ||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | |
| 19 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1978 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #272 | 1,494 | 0 | 0 |
| 20 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1979 | 6–6 | 50.0% | #184 | 1,559 | 0 | 0 |
| 21 | 1980 | 1–2 | 33.3% | #390 | 1,500 | 0 | 0 | 1980 | 2–7 | 22.2% | #283 | 1,547 | 0 | 0 |
| 22 | 1981 | 2–4 | 33.3% | #390 | 1,538 | 0 | 0 | 1981 | 9–12 | 42.9% | #283 | 1,608 | 0 | 0 |
| 23 | 1982 | 34–24 | 58.6% | #32 | 1,766 | 0 | 0 | 1982 | 26–17 | 60.5% | #40 | 1,777 | 0 | 1 |
| 24 | 1983 | 24–24 | 50.0% | #59 | 1,739 | 0 | 0 | 1983 | 0–7 | 0.0% | #81 | 1,635 | 0 | 1 |
| 25 | 1984 | 18–21 | 46.2% | #96 | 1,600 | 0 | 0 | 1984 | 13–12 | 52.0% | #65 | 1,672 | 0 | 1 |
| 26 | 1985 | 14–18 | 43.8% | #114 | 1,676 | 0 | 0 | 1985 | 11–25 | 30.6% | #150 | 1,621 | 0 | 1 |
| 27 | 1986 | 5–12 | 29.4% | #222 | 1,577 | 0 | 0 | 1986 | 5–7 | 41.7% | #145 | 1,626 | 0 | 1 |
| 28 | 1987 | 6–11 | 35.3% | #150 | 1,552 | 0 | 0 | 1987 | 4–12 | 25.0% | #234 | 1,551 | 0 | 1 |
| 29 | 1988 | 0–3 | 0.0% | #561 | 1,506 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |