H2H data updated: 2026-07-18 02:15 UTC
Chip Hooper vs Peter Fleming H2H: 3-0
Chip Hooper holds a 3–0 lead over Peter Fleming in their ATP head-to-head. Across 3 main-draw meetings, Chip Hooper leads 2–0 on hard courts and 1–0 on carpet. Most recently, Chip Hooper won the 1985 Cologne third round 6-4 6-2.
Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.
USA
Age 67
Right-Handed
198 cm / 6'6"
H2H
3
–
0
3 main draw meetings
USA
Age 71
Right-Handed
196 cm / 6'5"
H2H Match Log
| Date | Tournament | Category | Round | Surface | Winner | Score | Loser | Match |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Oct 24, 1985* | Cologne | ATP 250 | R32 | Hard | Chip Hooper | 6-4 6-2 | Peter Fleming | Match data |
| Aug 14, 1985* | Montreal / Toronto | Masters 1000 | R64 | Hard | Chip Hooper | 3-6 6-3 6-2 | Peter Fleming | Match data |
| Jan 28, 1982* | Philadelphia | ATP 250 | R32 | Carpet | Chip Hooper | 6-2 3-6 6-3 | Peter Fleming | Match data |
* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.
Career Comparison
| Player | Current | Peak | Pts | Elo | W | L | Win % | GS | 1000 | Finals | 500 | 250 | Titles |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Chip Hooper | #1,046 | #17 | 0 | 1,854 | 104 | 119 | 46.6% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Peter Fleming | #933 | #8 | 0 | 2,046 | 224 | 214 | 51.1% | 0 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 2 | 3 |
Career Progression by Age
Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.
| Age | Chip Hooper | Peter Fleming | ||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | |
| 17 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1972 | 0–1 | 0.0% | — | 1,495 | 0 | 0 |
| 18 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1973 | 1–2 | 33.3% | — | 1,492 | 0 | 0 |
| 19 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1974 | 0–2 | 0.0% | — | 1,484 | 0 | 0 |
| 20 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1975 | 6–7 | 46.2% | #120 | 1,541 | 0 | 0 |
| 21 | 1980 | 1–2 | 33.3% | #390 | 1,500 | 0 | 0 | 1976 | 15–14 | 51.7% | #116 | 1,635 | 0 | 0 |
| 22 | 1981 | 2–4 | 33.3% | #390 | 1,538 | 0 | 0 | 1977 | 31–28 | 52.5% | #47 | 1,813 | 0 | 0 |
| 23 | 1982 | 34–24 | 58.6% | #32 | 1,766 | 0 | 0 | 1978 | 43–31 | 58.1% | #26 | 1,953 | 0 | 1 |
| 24 | 1983 | 24–24 | 50.0% | #59 | 1,739 | 0 | 0 | 1979 | 45–26 | 63.4% | #13 | 1,916 | 0 | 3 |
| 25 | 1984 | 18–21 | 46.2% | #96 | 1,600 | 0 | 0 | 1980 | 21–19 | 52.5% | #37 | 1,768 | 0 | 3 |
| 26 | 1985 | 14–18 | 43.8% | #114 | 1,676 | 0 | 0 | 1981 | 9–13 | 40.9% | #99 | 1,733 | 0 | 3 |
| 27 | 1986 | 5–12 | 29.4% | #222 | 1,577 | 0 | 0 | 1982 | 2–6 | 25.0% | #106 | 1,653 | 0 | 3 |
| 28 | 1987 | 6–11 | 35.3% | #150 | 1,552 | 0 | 0 | 1983 | 14–11 | 56.0% | #32 | 1,765 | 0 | 3 |
| 29 | 1988 | 0–3 | 0.0% | #561 | 1,506 | 0 | 0 | 1984 | 18–19 | 48.6% | #51 | 1,735 | 0 | 3 |
| 30 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1985 | 9–12 | 42.9% | #94 | 1,686 | 0 | 3 |
| 31 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1986 | 6–10 | 37.5% | #103 | 1,656 | 0 | 3 |
| 32 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1987 | 4–13 | 23.5% | #174 | 1,561 | 0 | 3 |