H2H data updated: 2026-09-02 00:00 UTC

Chip Hooper vs Roscoe Tanner H2H: 2-1

Chip Hooper holds a 2–1 lead over Roscoe Tanner in their ATP head-to-head. Across 3 main-draw meetings, they are tied 1–1 on carpet, while Chip Hooper leads 1–0 on hard courts. Most recently, Roscoe Tanner won the 1984 Memphis round of 64 4-6 6-3 6-4.

Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.

Chip Hooper
USA Age 67 Right-Handed 198 cm / 6'6"
H2H
2 – 1
3 main draw meetings
Roscoe Tanner
USA Age 74 Left-Handed 183 cm / 6'0"

H2H Match Log

PlayerScorePlayerMatch DataDateRoundTournamentCategorySurface
Roscoe Tanner #41 4-6 6-3 6-4 Chip Hooper #48 Match data Feb 8, 1984* R64 Memphis ATP 250 Carpet
Chip Hooper #27 6-7 7-6 4-6 7-5 7-6 Roscoe Tanner #24 Match data Sep 4, 1982* R64 US Open Grand Slam Hard
Chip Hooper 6-4 7-6 Roscoe Tanner #11 Match data Jan 29, 1982* R16 Philadelphia ATP 250 Carpet

Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable. Arrows show an edition's recorded category and documented modern equivalent; unresolved editions keep their recorded category. Asterisked totals include editions mapped from documented historical predecessor categories. Mapping details.

Career Comparison

Player Current Peak Pts Elo W L Win % GS 1000 including documented historical predecessor categories Finals 500 including documented historical predecessor categories 250 including documented historical predecessor categories Titles
Chip Hooper #1,046 #17 0 1,855 104 119 46.6% 0 0 0 0 0 0
Roscoe Tanner #789 #4 0 2,162 592 294 66.8% 1 0 0 0 16 17

Career Progression by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.

Age Chip Hooper Roscoe Tanner
YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles
17 — — — — — — — 1969 0–2 0.0% — 1,479 0 0
18 — — — — — — — 1970 0–9 0.0% — 1,416 0 0
19 — — — — — — — 1971 16–10 61.5% — 1,706 0 0
20 — — — — — — — 1972 29–14 67.4% — 1,910 0 0
21 1980 1–2 33.3% #390 1,500 0 0 1973 45–30 60.0% #24 1,837 0 0
22 1981 2–4 33.3% — 1,538 0 0 1974 65–27 70.7% #14 1,963 0 2
23 1982 34–24 58.6% #32 1,767 0 0 1975 65–23 73.9% #9 1,972 0 5
24 1983 24–24 50.0% #59 1,740 0 0 1976 70–28 71.4% #11 2,018 0 9
25 1984 18–21 46.2% #96 1,601 0 0 1977 52–30 63.4% #13 1,889 1 11
26 1985 14–18 43.8% #114 1,675 0 0 1978 57–22 72.2% #11 1,940 1 13
27 1986 5–12 29.4% #222 1,577 0 0 1979 61–19 76.2% #5 2,032 1 15
28 1987 6–11 35.3% #150 1,552 0 0 1980 42–16 72.4% #13 1,996 1 16
29 1988 0–3 0.0% #561 1,505 0 0 1981 51–22 69.9% #12 1,925 1 17
30 — — — — — — — 1982 20–17 54.1% #43 1,785 1 17
31 — — — — — — — 1983 16–13 55.2% #36 1,874 1 17
32 — — — — — — — 1984 3–11 21.4% #249 1,680 1 17
33 — — — — — — — 1985 0–1 0.0% #794 1,662 1 17

Surface Results by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. Results cover completed main-draw matches. Bold green marks the higher win percentage when both players have at least 5 matches on that surface at the aligned age.

Age Chip Hooper Roscoe Tanner
Yr HardClayGrassCarpet Yr HardClayGrassCarpet
W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win %
17 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 1969 — — — — — — — — 0 2 2 0.0% — — — —
18 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 1970 0 4 4 0.0% 0 3 3 0.0% 0 2 2 0.0% — — — —
19 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 1971 10 5 15 66.7% 4 3 7 57.1% 2 1 3 66.7% 0 1 1 0.0%
20 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 1972 9 3 12 75.0% 5 5 10 50.0% 9 3 12 75.0% 6 3 9 66.7%
21 1980 1 2 3 33.3% — — — — — — — — — — — — 1973 12 8 20 60.0% 15 9 24 62.5% 3 4 7 42.9% 15 9 24 62.5%
22 1981 2 3 5 40.0% 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — — — — — 1974 30 11 41 73.2% 8 7 15 53.3% 17 3 20 85.0% 10 6 16 62.5%
23 1982 8 9 17 47.1% 5 2 7 71.4% 4 3 7 57.1% 17 10 27 63.0% 1975 27 7 34 79.4% 16 8 24 66.7% 9 2 11 81.8% 13 6 19 68.4%
24 1983 12 10 22 54.5% 0 2 2 0.0% 5 5 10 50.0% 7 7 14 50.0% 1976 22 10 32 68.8% 22 6 28 78.6% 10 3 13 76.9% 16 9 25 64.0%
25 1984 7 7 14 50.0% 2 4 6 33.3% 1 3 4 25.0% 8 7 15 53.3% 1977 8 6 14 57.1% 16 9 25 64.0% 22 6 28 78.6% 6 9 15 40.0%
26 1985 9 9 18 50.0% — — — — 2 4 6 33.3% 3 5 8 37.5% 1978 19 8 27 70.4% 6 3 9 66.7% 7 2 9 77.8% 25 9 34 73.5%
27 1986 4 7 11 36.4% — — — — 1 2 3 33.3% 0 3 3 0.0% 1979 21 5 26 80.8% 5 2 7 71.4% 10 2 12 83.3% 25 10 35 71.4%
28 1987 4 7 11 36.4% — — — — 0 2 2 0.0% 2 2 4 50.0% 1980 14 6 20 70.0% 0 1 1 0.0% 12 2 14 85.7% 16 7 23 69.6%
29 1988 0 2 2 0.0% — — — — — — — — 0 1 1 0.0% 1981 19 8 27 70.4% 1 1 2 50.0% 10 5 15 66.7% 21 8 29 72.4%
30 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 1982 10 8 18 55.6% — — — — 4 2 6 66.7% 6 7 13 46.2%
31 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 1983 7 5 12 58.3% 0 1 1 0.0% 6 3 9 66.7% 3 4 7 42.9%
32 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 1984 1 8 9 11.1% 1 1 2 50.0% — — — — 1 2 3 33.3%
33 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 1985 — — — — — — — — — — — — 0 1 1 0.0%
Career — 47 56 103 45.6% 7 9 16 43.8% 13 19 32 40.6% 37 35 72 51.4% — 209 102 311 67.2% 99 59 158 62.7% 121 42 163 74.2% 163 91 254 64.2%

Advanced Statistics Comparison by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. Metrics are precomputed from eligible main-draw results; point-stat values use the available detailed sample. Bold green marks the stronger value when both underlying samples are sufficient. Lower is better for Schedule because a negative value means a tougher schedule. Career Schedule is normalized per 100 matches.

Age Chip Hooper Roscoe Tanner
Yr Elo P+ Serve+ Return+ PD TPW% Hard Elo Clay Elo Grass Elo Set Win % Set Margin Dec. Set Tiebreak Pressure+ Schedule Yr Elo P+ Serve+ Return+ PD TPW% Hard Elo Clay Elo Grass Elo Set Win % Set Margin Dec. Set Tiebreak Pressure+ Schedule
17 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 1969 1479 102.4 — — — — — — — 28.6% -1.14 0–1 — — -0.17
18 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 1970 1417 113.2 — — — — +103 +73 — 13.6% -1.45 0–2 1–2 (33%) — -0.50
19 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 1971 1706 127.5 — — — — -2 -129 -172 56.9% +0.31 6–2 (75%) 5–4 (56%) — -0.17
20 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 1972 1910 135.7 — — — — -21 -296 -167 59.5% +0.43 11–3 (79%) 14–8 (64%) — -0.27
21 1980 1501 105.5 — — — — +42 — — 37.5% -0.63 — — — +0.28 1973 1838 144.5 — — — — +53 -90 -106 56.7% +0.51 11–10 (52%) 15–15 (50%) — -3.40
22 1981 1539 121.6 — — — — +43 — — 35.3% -0.53 1–1 1–3 (25%) — -0.43 1974 1963 154.0 — — — — -10 -226 +137 65.9% +1.12 16–13 (55%) 15–17 (47%) — -2.27
23 1982 1768 148.4 — — — — -8 -129 -168 55.6% +0.15 12–8 (60%) 22–12 (65%) — -2.42 1975 1972 153.3 — — — — +62 -153 +164 67.7% +1.19 19–14 (58%) 17–14 (55%) — -0.74
24 1983 1740 143.4 — — — — +49 — -86 53.0% +0.02 7–9 (44%) 16–11 (59%) — -2.82 1976 2018 159.4 — — — — +24 -49 +104 66.7% +1.29 18–11 (62%) 18–20 (47%) — -2.11
25 1984 1601 120.5 — — — — +93 -39 -36 49.0% -0.08 4–8 (33%) 12–11 (52%) — +5.40 1977 1890 153.2 — — — — -1 +22 +206 62.7% +0.94 13–18 (42%) 11–12 (48%) — -0.49
26 1985 1676 129.9 — — — — +27 — -91 48.0% -0.40 3–6 (33%) 4–7 (36%) — +0.03 1978 1941 160.3 — — — — +36 -25 +162 67.2% +1.20 10–8 (56%) 23–10 (70%) — -1.59
27 1986 1578 119.2 — — — — +36 — -32 37.8% -0.71 1–5 (17%) 2–6 (25%) — +0.71 1979 2032 164.1 — — — — +32 -91 +131 71.3% +1.27 13–8 (62%) 22–14 (61%) — -3.91
28 1987 1552 121.0 — — — — +23 — — 41.0% -0.49 0–4 (0%) 3–6 (33%) — +0.31 1980 1997 154.8 — — — — +23 — +198 70.9% +1.29 6–10 (38%) 17–5 (77%) — -1.79
29 1988 1506 103.1 — — — — +11 — — 16.7% -1.34 0–1 0–1 — +0.19 1981 1926 156.1 — — — — +117 — +82 66.0% +1.02 14–9 (61%) 19–13 (59%) — -0.51
30 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 1982 1786 138.8 — — — — +4 — +208 51.5% -0.01 9–6 (60%) 10–12 (45%) — -2.07
31 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 1983 1874 146.4 — — — — -44 — +125 53.4% +0.14 7–5 (58%) 11–7 (61%) — -4.29
32 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 1984 1681 120.1 — — — — -28 — — 25.8% -1.52 2–2 (50%) 1–2 (33%) — -0.69
33 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 1985 1662 99.2 — — — — — — — 33.3% -1.00 0–1 1–0 — +0.08
Career — 1855 139.7 — — — — +34 -87 -94 49.1% -0.15 28–42 (40%) 60–57 (51%) 99.3 +0.56 — 2162 157.4 — — — — +30 -96 +112 63.1% +0.88 155–123 (56%) 200–155 (56%) 99.8 -2.84

Career Rivalries

Each player's five most-played main-draw opponents. The current matchup is highlighted when it appears in a player's top five.