H2H data updated: 2026-07-18 17:48 UTC
Chip Hooper vs Van Winitsky H2H: 1-0
Chip Hooper holds a 1–0 lead over Van Winitsky in their ATP head-to-head. Across 1 main-draw meeting, Chip Hooper leads 1–0 on hard courts. Most recently, Chip Hooper won the 1983 Maui fourth round 6-4 6-7 6-4.
Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.
USA
Age 67
Right-Handed
198 cm / 6'6"
H2H
1
–
0
1 main draw meetings
USA
Age 67
Left-Handed
185 cm / 6'1"
H2H Match Log
| Date | Tournament | Category | Round | Surface | Winner | Score | Loser | Match |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Sep 29, 1983* | Maui | ATP 250 | R16 | Hard | Chip Hooper | 6-4 6-7 6-4 | Van Winitsky | Match data |
* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.
Career Comparison
| Player | Current | Peak | Pts | Elo | W | L | Win % | GS | 1000 | Finals | 500 | 250 | Titles |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Chip Hooper | #1,046 | #17 | 0 | 1,854 | 104 | 119 | 46.6% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Van Winitsky | #834 | #35 | 0 | 1,852 | 106 | 133 | 44.4% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 3 | 3 |
Career Progression by Age
Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.
| Age | Chip Hooper | Van Winitsky | ||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | |
| 16 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1975 | 1–1 | 50.0% | #282 | 1,505 | 0 | 0 |
| 17 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1976 | 1–2 | 33.3% | #239 | 1,527 | 0 | 0 |
| 18 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1977 | 8–7 | 53.3% | #169 | 1,648 | 0 | 0 |
| 19 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1978 | 15–25 | 37.5% | #132 | 1,590 | 0 | 0 |
| 20 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1979 | 6–14 | 30.0% | #141 | 1,579 | 0 | 0 |
| 21 | 1980 | 1–2 | 33.3% | #390 | 1,500 | 0 | 0 | 1980 | 14–17 | 45.2% | #90 | 1,675 | 0 | 0 |
| 22 | 1981 | 2–4 | 33.3% | #390 | 1,538 | 0 | 0 | 1981 | 16–12 | 57.1% | #47 | 1,717 | 0 | 1 |
| 23 | 1982 | 34–24 | 58.6% | #32 | 1,766 | 0 | 0 | 1982 | 28–23 | 54.9% | #53 | 1,698 | 0 | 3 |
| 24 | 1983 | 24–24 | 50.0% | #59 | 1,739 | 0 | 0 | 1983 | 10–17 | 37.0% | #91 | 1,646 | 0 | 3 |
| 25 | 1984 | 18–21 | 46.2% | #96 | 1,600 | 0 | 0 | 1984 | 7–14 | 33.3% | #133 | 1,564 | 0 | 3 |
| 26 | 1985 | 14–18 | 43.8% | #114 | 1,676 | 0 | 0 | 1985 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #331 | 1,551 | 0 | 3 |
| 27 | 1986 | 5–12 | 29.4% | #222 | 1,577 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 28 | 1987 | 6–11 | 35.3% | #150 | 1,552 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 29 | 1988 | 0–3 | 0.0% | #561 | 1,506 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |