H2H data updated: 2026-09-03 00:00 UTC

Chris Bailey vs Daniel Montes De Oca H2H: 1-0

Chris Bailey holds a 1–0 lead over Daniel Montes De Oca in their ATP head-to-head. Across 1 main-draw meeting, Chris Bailey leads 1–0 on hard courts. Most recently, Chris Bailey won the 1989 Livingston round of 32 7-5 4-6 6-3.

Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.

Chris Bailey
GBR Age 58 Right-Handed 196 cm / 6'5"
H2H
1 – 0
1 main draw meetings
Daniel Montes De Oca
URU Age 64 Right-Handed

H2H Match Log

PlayerScorePlayerMatch DataDateRoundTournamentCategorySurface
Chris Bailey #164 7-5 4-6 6-3 Daniel Montes De Oca Match data Aug 10, 1989* R32 Livingston ATP 250 Hard

Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable. Arrows show an edition's recorded category and documented modern equivalent; unresolved editions keep their recorded category. Asterisked totals include editions mapped from documented historical predecessor categories. Mapping details.

Career Comparison

Player Current Peak Pts Elo W L Win % GS 1000 including documented historical predecessor categories Finals 500 including documented historical predecessor categories 250 including documented historical predecessor categories Titles
Chris Bailey #700 #126 258 1,575 16 31 34.0% 0 0 0 0 0 0
Daniel Montes De Oca — — — 1,500 — — — 0 0 0 0 0 0

Career Progression by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.

Age Chris Bailey Daniel Montes De Oca
YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles
19 1987 2–2 50.0% #352 1,531 0 0 — — — — — — —
20 1988 1–5 16.7% #218 1,496 0 0 — — — — — — —
21 1989 9–10 47.4% #175 1,542 0 0 — — — — — — —
22 1990 0–2 0.0% #426 1,514 0 0 — — — — — — —
23 1991 0–2 0.0% #335 1,491 0 0 — — — — — — —
24 1992 0–1 0.0% #240 1,480 0 0 — — — — — — —
25 1993 3–6 33.3% #171 1,516 0 0 — — — — — — —
26 1994 1–3 25.0% #348 1,507 0 0 — — — — — — —

Surface Results by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. Results cover completed main-draw matches. Bold green marks the higher win percentage when both players have at least 5 matches on that surface at the aligned age.

Age Chris Bailey Daniel Montes De Oca
Yr HardGrassCarpet Yr HardGrassCarpet
W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win %
19 1987 — — — — 2 2 4 50.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
20 1988 1 3 4 25.0% 0 2 2 0.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
21 1989 5 6 11 45.5% 4 3 7 57.1% 0 1 1 0.0% 1983 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — — — — —
22 1990 — — — — 0 2 2 0.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
23 1991 — — — — 0 1 1 0.0% 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — —
24 1992 — — — — 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
25 1993 1 3 4 25.0% 2 3 5 40.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
26 1994 — — — — 1 3 4 25.0% — — — — 1988 0 2 2 0.0% — — — — — — — —
27 — — — — — — — — — — — — — 1989 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — — — — —
28 — — — — — — — — — — — — — 1990 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — — — — —
Career — 7 12 19 36.8% 9 17 26 34.6% 0 2 2 0.0% — 0 5 5 0.0% — — — — — — — —

Advanced Statistics Comparison by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. Metrics are precomputed from eligible main-draw results; point-stat values use the available detailed sample. Bold green marks the stronger value when both underlying samples are sufficient. Lower is better for Schedule because a negative value means a tougher schedule. Career Schedule is normalized per 100 matches.

Age Chris Bailey Daniel Montes De Oca
Yr Elo P+ Serve+ Return+ PD TPW% Hard Elo Clay Elo Grass Elo Set Win % Set Margin Dec. Set Tiebreak Pressure+ Schedule Yr Elo P+ Serve+ Return+ PD TPW% Hard Elo Clay Elo Grass Elo Set Win % Set Margin Dec. Set Tiebreak Pressure+ Schedule
19 1987 1531 100.7 — — — — — — +34 41.7% -1.17 1–0 2–0 — 0.00 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
20 1988 1497 104.5 — — — — +23 — — 25.0% -1.44 0–1 1–1 — -0.11 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
21 1989 1543 112.5 — — — — -26 — +46 43.8% -0.42 4–1 (80%) 3–4 (43%) — +1.66 1983 1484 97.5 — — — — — — — 0.0% -3.00 — 0–1 — +0.22
22 1990 1514 96.9 — — — — — — — 0.0% -2.40 — 0–1 — +0.04 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
23 1991 1492 103.6 -1.63 +0.93 0.878 48.5% — — — 20.0% -1.80 0–1 1–1 — +0.07 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
24 1992 1481 99.8 -0.52 -1.27 0.600 40.2% — — — 0.0% -3.67 — — — -0.04 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
25 1993 1516 112.2 +0.20 -1.30 0.853 47.7% -15 — +43 39.1% -0.96 0–1 2–1 (67%) — -0.15 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
26 1994 1507 103.7 -2.63 -0.55 0.843 48.3% — — +24 41.7% -0.58 0–2 2–1 (67%) — -0.14 1988 1453 91.6 — — — — — — — 0.0% -3.75 — — — +0.39
27 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 1989 1441 98.0 — — — — — — — 33.3% -1.00 0–1 — — +0.13
28 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 1990 1429 98.1 — — — — — — — 0.0% -3.00 — — — +0.13
Career — 1575 110.9 -0.79 -0.92 0.829 47.4% -14 — +38 36.3% -0.95 5–6 (45%) 11–9 (55%) 102.6 +2.83 — 1500 93.1 — — — — — — — 9.1% -2.73 0–1 0–1 — +17.40

Career Rivalries

Each player's five most-played main-draw opponents. The current matchup is highlighted when it appears in a player's top five.