H2H data updated: 2026-07-19 08:25 UTC
Chris Pridham vs Martin Wostenholme H2H: 1-1
Chris Pridham and Martin Wostenholme are tied 1–1 in their ATP head-to-head. Across 2 main-draw meetings, they are tied 1–1 on hard courts. Most recently, Chris Pridham won the 1991 Tel Aviv third round 6-4 6-3.
Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.
CAN
Age 61
Right-Handed
183 cm / 6'0"
H2H
1
–
1
2 main draw meetings
CAN
Age 63
Right-Handed
183 cm / 6'0"
H2H Match Log
| Date | Tournament | Category | Round | Surface | Winner | Score | Loser | Match |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Oct 10, 1991* | Tel Aviv | ATP 250 | R32 | Hard | Chris Pridham | 6-4 6-3 | Martin Wostenholme | Match data |
| Aug 15, 1990* | New Haven | ATP 250 | R64 | Hard | Martin Wostenholme | 6-2 3-6 4-1 (ret.) | Chris Pridham | Match data |
* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.
Career Comparison
| Player | Current | Peak | Pts | Elo | W | L | Win % | GS | 1000 | Finals | 500 | 250 | Titles |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Chris Pridham | #1,219 | #75 | 433 | 1,649 | 51 | 74 | 40.8% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Martin Wostenholme | #1,171 | #84 | 265 | 1,607 | 44 | 79 | 35.8% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
Career Progression by Age
Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.
| Age | Chris Pridham | Martin Wostenholme | ||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | |
| 16 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1979 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #579 | 1,497 | 0 | 0 |
| 17 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1980 | 0–1 | 0.0% | — | 1,496 | 0 | 0 |
| 19 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1982 | 2–1 | 66.7% | — | 1,519 | 0 | 0 |
| 20 | 1985 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #248 | 1,481 | 0 | 0 | 1983 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #329 | 1,502 | 0 | 0 |
| 21 | 1986 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #263 | 1,471 | 0 | 0 | 1984 | 2–3 | 40.0% | #186 | 1,526 | 0 | 0 |
| 22 | 1987 | 1–2 | 33.3% | #114 | 1,483 | 0 | 0 | 1985 | 4–8 | 33.3% | #93 | 1,556 | 0 | 0 |
| 23 | 1988 | 13–15 | 46.4% | #137 | 1,532 | 0 | 0 | 1986 | 9–18 | 33.3% | #190 | 1,533 | 0 | 0 |
| 24 | 1989 | 7–11 | 38.9% | #146 | 1,556 | 0 | 0 | 1987 | 2–7 | 22.2% | #251 | 1,494 | 0 | 0 |
| 25 | 1990 | 2–7 | 22.2% | #155 | 1,490 | 0 | 0 | 1988 | 3–4 | 42.9% | #293 | 1,496 | 0 | 0 |
| 26 | 1991 | 3–5 | 37.5% | #132 | 1,494 | 0 | 0 | 1989 | 6–8 | 42.9% | #120 | 1,537 | 0 | 0 |
| 27 | 1992 | 14–16 | 46.7% | #131 | 1,578 | 0 | 0 | 1990 | 10–19 | 34.5% | #156 | 1,509 | 0 | 0 |
| 28 | 1993 | 11–15 | 42.3% | #145 | 1,586 | 0 | 0 | 1991 | 6–7 | 46.2% | #153 | 1,523 | 0 | 0 |
| 29 | 1994 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #1219 | 1,565 | 0 | 0 | 1992 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #340 | 1,512 | 0 | 0 |