H2H data updated: 2026-07-18 02:15 UTC
Chris Pridham vs Peter Doohan H2H: 1-0
Chris Pridham holds a 1–0 lead over Peter Doohan in their ATP head-to-head. Across 1 main-draw meeting, Chris Pridham leads 1–0 on grass. Most recently, Chris Pridham won the 1988 Queen's Club second round 6-2 6-3.
Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.
CAN
Age 61
Right-Handed
183 cm / 6'0"
H2H
1
–
0
1 main draw meetings
AUS
Right-Handed
190 cm / 6'3"
H2H Match Log
| Date | Tournament | Category | Round | Surface | Winner | Score | Loser | Match |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Jun 8, 1988* | Queen's Club | ATP 250 | R64 | Grass | Chris Pridham | 6-2 6-3 | Peter Doohan | Match data |
* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.
Career Comparison
| Player | Current | Peak | Pts | Elo | W | L | Win % | GS | 1000 | Finals | 500 | 250 | Titles |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Chris Pridham | #1,219 | #75 | 433 | 1,649 | 51 | 74 | 40.8% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Peter Doohan | #1,102 | #43 | 140 | 1,737 | 50 | 82 | 37.9% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 1 |
Career Progression by Age
Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.
| Age | Chris Pridham | Peter Doohan | ||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | |
| 18 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1979 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #480 | 1,491 | 0 | 0 |
| 19 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1980 | 1–2 | 33.3% | — | 1,493 | 0 | 0 |
| 20 | 1985 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #248 | 1,481 | 0 | 0 | 1981 | 0–2 | 0.0% | #549 | 1,484 | 0 | 0 |
| 21 | 1986 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #263 | 1,471 | 0 | 0 | 1982 | 3–3 | 50.0% | — | 1,505 | 0 | 0 |
| 22 | 1987 | 1–2 | 33.3% | #114 | 1,483 | 0 | 0 | 1983 | 1–2 | 33.3% | #363 | 1,500 | 0 | 0 |
| 23 | 1988 | 13–15 | 46.4% | #137 | 1,532 | 0 | 0 | 1984 | 10–9 | 52.6% | #85 | 1,614 | 0 | 1 |
| 24 | 1989 | 7–11 | 38.9% | #146 | 1,556 | 0 | 0 | 1985 | 18–19 | 48.6% | #101 | 1,683 | 0 | 1 |
| 25 | 1990 | 2–7 | 22.2% | #155 | 1,490 | 0 | 0 | 1986 | 0–7 | 0.0% | #301 | 1,555 | 0 | 1 |
| 26 | 1991 | 3–5 | 37.5% | #132 | 1,494 | 0 | 0 | 1987 | 12–15 | 44.4% | #72 | 1,618 | 0 | 1 |
| 27 | 1992 | 14–16 | 46.7% | #131 | 1,578 | 0 | 0 | 1988 | 4–13 | 23.5% | #187 | 1,485 | 0 | 1 |
| 28 | 1993 | 11–15 | 42.3% | #145 | 1,586 | 0 | 0 | 1989 | 1–5 | 16.7% | #172 | 1,451 | 0 | 1 |
| 29 | 1994 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #1219 | 1,565 | 0 | 0 | 1990 | 0–2 | 0.0% | #331 | 1,435 | 0 | 1 |
| 30 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1991 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #1131 | 1,427 | 0 | 1 |
| 31 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1992 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #1097 | 1,421 | 0 | 1 |