H2H data updated: 2026-07-20 14:15 UTC
Chris Woodruff vs Galo Blanco H2H: 0-1
Galo Blanco holds a 1–0 lead over Chris Woodruff in their ATP head-to-head. Across 1 main-draw meeting, Galo Blanco leads 1–0 on clay. Most recently, Galo Blanco won the 1997 Roland Garros third round 7-6(6) 6-3 7-6(2).
Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.
USA
Age 53
Right-Handed
188 cm / 6'2"
H2H
0
–
1
1 main draw meetings
ESP
Age 49
Right-Handed
173 cm / 5'8"
H2H Match Log
| Date | Tournament | Category | Round | Surface | Winner | Score | Loser | Match |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Jun 1, 1997* | Roland Garros | Grand Slam | R32 | Clay | Galo Blanco | 7-6(6) 6-3 7-6(2) | Chris Woodruff | Match data |
* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.
Career Comparison
| Player | Current | Peak | Pts | Elo | W | L | Win % | GS | 1000 | Finals | 500 | 250 | Titles |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Chris Woodruff | #1,334 | #29 | 1,273 | 1,829 | 108 | 106 | 50.5% | 0 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 2 |
| Galo Blanco | #809 | #40 | 963 | 1,750 | 122 | 175 | 41.1% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 1 |
Career Progression by Age
Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.
| Age | Chris Woodruff | Galo Blanco | ||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | |
| 17 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1994 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #470 | 1,489 | 0 | 0 |
| 18 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1995 | 3–4 | 42.9% | #164 | 1,520 | 0 | 0 |
| 19 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1996 | 11–16 | 40.7% | #97 | 1,543 | 0 | 0 |
| 20 | 1993 | 1–2 | 33.3% | #337 | 1,496 | 0 | 0 | 1997 | 16–20 | 44.4% | #52 | 1,594 | 0 | 0 |
| 21 | 1994 | 0–2 | 0.0% | #300 | 1,480 | 0 | 0 | 1998 | 20–25 | 44.4% | #82 | 1,623 | 0 | 0 |
| 22 | 1995 | 1–2 | 33.3% | #135 | 1,485 | 0 | 0 | 1999 | 14–19 | 42.4% | #75 | 1,621 | 0 | 1 |
| 23 | 1996 | 20–18 | 52.6% | #43 | 1,667 | 0 | 0 | 2000 | 12–20 | 37.5% | #114 | 1,571 | 0 | 1 |
| 24 | 1997 | 35–21 | 62.5% | #30 | 1,777 | 0 | 1 | 2001 | 20–23 | 46.5% | #56 | 1,631 | 0 | 1 |
| 25 | 1998 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #1324 | 1,761 | 0 | 1 | 2002 | 8–19 | 29.6% | #134 | 1,573 | 0 | 1 |
| 26 | 1999 | 22–19 | 53.7% | #51 | 1,770 | 0 | 2 | 2003 | 10–9 | 52.6% | #99 | 1,625 | 0 | 1 |
| 27 | 2000 | 18–23 | 43.9% | #67 | 1,687 | 0 | 2 | 2004 | 7–15 | 31.8% | #174 | 1,555 | 0 | 1 |
| 28 | 2001 | 11–17 | 39.3% | #118 | 1,630 | 0 | 2 | 2005 | 0–3 | 0.0% | #315 | 1,497 | 0 | 1 |
| 29 | 2002 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #496 | 1,589 | 0 | 2 | 2006 | 1–1 | 50.0% | #822 | 1,509 | 0 | 1 |