H2H data updated: 2026-07-18 17:48 UTC
Chris Woodruff vs Grant Stafford H2H: 1-1
Chris Woodruff and Grant Stafford are tied 1–1 in their ATP head-to-head. Across 2 main-draw meetings, Grant Stafford leads 1–0 on clay, while Chris Woodruff leads 1–0 on hard courts. Most recently, Grant Stafford won the 1997 Orlando semifinal 6-3 4-6 6-4.
Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.
USA
Age 53
Right-Handed
188 cm / 6'2"
H2H
1
–
1
2 main draw meetings
RSA
Age 55
Right-Handed
188 cm / 6'2"
H2H Match Log
| Date | Tournament | Category | Round | Surface | Winner | Score | Loser | Match |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Apr 26, 1997* | Orlando | ATP 250 | SF | Clay | Grant Stafford | 6-3 4-6 6-4 | Chris Woodruff | Match data |
| Aug 12, 1996 | Indianapolis | ATP 250 | R64 | Hard | Chris Woodruff | 6-2 7-5 | Grant Stafford | Match data |
* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.
Career Comparison
| Player | Current | Peak | Pts | Elo | W | L | Win % | GS | 1000 | Finals | 500 | 250 | Titles |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Chris Woodruff | #1,334 | #29 | 1,273 | 1,829 | 108 | 106 | 50.5% | 0 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 2 |
| Grant Stafford | #1,161 | #53 | 750 | 1,799 | 83 | 111 | 42.8% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
Career Progression by Age
Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.
| Age | Chris Woodruff | Grant Stafford | ||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | |
| 19 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1990 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #264 | 1,492 | 0 | 0 |
| 20 | 1993 | 1–2 | 33.3% | #337 | 1,496 | 0 | 0 | 1991 | 5–6 | 45.5% | #172 | 1,553 | 0 | 0 |
| 21 | 1994 | 0–2 | 0.0% | #300 | 1,480 | 0 | 0 | 1992 | 4–4 | 50.0% | #191 | 1,636 | 0 | 0 |
| 22 | 1995 | 1–2 | 33.3% | #135 | 1,485 | 0 | 0 | 1993 | 17–14 | 54.8% | #86 | 1,707 | 0 | 0 |
| 23 | 1996 | 20–18 | 52.6% | #43 | 1,667 | 0 | 0 | 1994 | 11–21 | 34.4% | #168 | 1,555 | 0 | 0 |
| 24 | 1997 | 35–21 | 62.5% | #30 | 1,777 | 0 | 1 | 1995 | 2–7 | 22.2% | #288 | 1,527 | 0 | 0 |
| 25 | 1998 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #1324 | 1,761 | 0 | 1 | 1996 | 10–13 | 43.5% | #83 | 1,562 | 0 | 0 |
| 26 | 1999 | 22–19 | 53.7% | #51 | 1,770 | 0 | 2 | 1997 | 21–20 | 51.2% | #74 | 1,655 | 0 | 0 |
| 27 | 2000 | 18–23 | 43.9% | #67 | 1,687 | 0 | 2 | 1998 | 12–21 | 36.4% | #163 | 1,563 | 0 | 0 |
| 28 | 2001 | 11–17 | 39.3% | #118 | 1,630 | 0 | 2 | 1999 | 0–3 | 0.0% | #475 | 1,534 | 0 | 0 |
| 29 | 2002 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #496 | 1,589 | 0 | 2 | 2000 | 1–1 | 50.0% | #435 | 1,591 | 0 | 0 |