H2H data updated: 2026-07-19 02:51 UTC

Chris Woodruff vs Jeff Tarango H2H: 2-0

Chris Woodruff holds a 2–0 lead over Jeff Tarango in their ATP head-to-head. Across 2 main-draw meetings, Chris Woodruff leads 2–0 on hard courts. Most recently, Chris Woodruff won the 1997 Scottsdale third round 7-6(4) 6-2.

Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.

Chris Woodruff
USA Age 53 Right-Handed 188 cm / 6'2"
H2H
2 – 0
2 main draw meetings
Jeff Tarango
USA Age 57 Left-Handed 180 cm / 5'11"

H2H Match Log

DateTournamentCategoryRoundSurfaceWinnerScoreLoserMatch
Mar 6, 1997* Scottsdale ATP 250 R32 Hard Chris Woodruff #64 7-6(4) 6-2 Jeff Tarango #77 Match data
Nov 7, 1996* Stockholm ATP 250 R32 Hard Chris Woodruff #46 6-3 6-4 Jeff Tarango #101 Match data

* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.

Career Comparison

Player Current Peak Pts Elo W L Win % GS 1000 Finals 500 250 Titles
Chris Woodruff #1,334 #29 1,273 1,829 108 106 50.5% 0 1 0 0 1 2
Jeff Tarango #1,001 #42 877 1,787 239 293 44.9% 0 0 0 0 2 2

Career Progression by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.

Age Chris Woodruff Jeff Tarango
YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles
18 — — — — — — — 1987 1–2 33.3% #377 1,507 0 0
19 — — — — — — — 1988 7–6 53.8% #96 1,598 0 0
20 1993 1–2 33.3% #337 1,496 0 0 1989 10–11 47.6% #137 1,647 0 0
21 1994 0–2 0.0% #300 1,480 0 0 1990 11–17 39.3% #131 1,606 0 0
22 1995 1–2 33.3% #135 1,485 0 0 1991 16–23 41.0% #106 1,612 0 0
23 1996 20–18 52.6% #43 1,667 0 0 1992 28–24 53.8% #45 1,694 0 2
24 1997 35–21 62.5% #30 1,777 0 1 1993 24–26 48.0% #91 1,670 0 2
25 1998 0–1 0.0% #1324 1,761 0 1 1994 23–27 46.0% #78 1,654 0 2
26 1999 22–19 53.7% #51 1,770 0 2 1995 18–24 42.9% #76 1,661 0 2
27 2000 18–23 43.9% #67 1,687 0 2 1996 14–18 43.8% #106 1,620 0 2
28 2001 11–17 39.3% #118 1,630 0 2 1997 31–29 51.7% #49 1,692 0 2
29 2002 0–1 0.0% #496 1,589 0 2 1998 24–29 45.3% #73 1,660 0 2
30 — — — — — — — 1999 21–24 46.7% #55 1,685 0 2
31 — — — — — — — 2000 10–24 29.4% #112 1,515 0 2
32 — — — — — — — 2001 1–8 11.1% #323 1,452 0 2
33 — — — — — — — 2002 0–1 0.0% #730 1,446 0 2