H2H data updated: 2026-09-02 00:00 UTC

Chris Woodruff vs Jeff Tarango H2H: 2-0

Chris Woodruff holds a 2–0 lead over Jeff Tarango in their ATP head-to-head. Across 2 main-draw meetings, Chris Woodruff leads 2–0 on hard courts. Most recently, Chris Woodruff won the 1997 Scottsdale round of 32 7-6(4) 6-2.

Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.

Chris Woodruff
USA Age 53 Right-Handed 188 cm / 6'2"
H2H
2 – 0
2 main draw meetings
Jeff Tarango
USA Age 57 Left-Handed 180 cm / 5'11"

H2H Match Log

PlayerScorePlayerMatch DataDateRoundTournamentCategorySurface
Chris Woodruff #64 7-6(4) 6-2 Jeff Tarango #77 Match data Mar 6, 1997* R32 Scottsdale World Series → modern equivalent ATP 250 Hard
Chris Woodruff #46 6-3 6-4 Jeff Tarango #101 Match data Nov 7, 1996* R32 Stockholm Open World Series → modern equivalent ATP 250 Hard

Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable. Arrows show an edition's recorded category and documented modern equivalent; unresolved editions keep their recorded category. Asterisked totals include editions mapped from documented historical predecessor categories. Mapping details.

Career Comparison

Player Current Peak Pts Elo W L Win % GS 1000 including documented historical predecessor categories Finals 500 including documented historical predecessor categories 250 including documented historical predecessor categories Titles
Chris Woodruff #1,334 #29 1,273 1,838 108 106 50.5% 0 1 0 0 1 2
Jeff Tarango #1,001 #42 877 1,788 240 294 44.9% 0 0 0 0 2 2

Career Progression by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.

Age Chris Woodruff Jeff Tarango
YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles
18 — — — — — — — 1987 1–2 33.3% #377 1,507 0 0
19 — — — — — — — 1988 7–6 53.8% #96 1,598 0 0
20 1993 1–2 33.3% #337 1,497 0 0 1989 10–11 47.6% #137 1,647 0 0
21 1994 0–2 0.0% #300 1,481 0 0 1990 11–17 39.3% #131 1,607 0 0
22 1995 1–2 33.3% #135 1,485 0 0 1991 16–23 41.0% #106 1,613 0 0
23 1996 20–18 52.6% #43 1,677 0 0 1992 28–24 53.8% #45 1,694 0 2
24 1997 35–21 62.5% #30 1,803 0 1 1993 24–26 48.0% #91 1,670 0 2
25 1998 0–1 0.0% #1324 1,787 0 1 1994 23–27 46.0% #78 1,655 0 2
26 1999 22–19 53.7% #51 1,773 0 2 1995 18–24 42.9% #76 1,654 0 2
27 2000 18–23 43.9% #67 1,695 0 2 1996 14–18 43.8% #106 1,619 0 2
28 2001 11–17 39.3% #118 1,633 0 2 1997 31–29 51.7% #49 1,693 0 2
29 2002 0–1 0.0% #496 1,593 0 2 1998 24–29 45.3% #73 1,660 0 2
30 — — — — — — — 1999 21–24 46.7% #55 1,685 0 2
31 — — — — — — — 2000 11–25 30.6% #112 1,517 0 2
32 — — — — — — — 2001 1–8 11.1% #323 1,452 0 2
33 — — — — — — — 2002 0–1 0.0% #730 1,447 0 2

Surface Results by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. Results cover completed main-draw matches. Bold green marks the higher win percentage when both players have at least 5 matches on that surface at the aligned age.

Age Chris Woodruff Jeff Tarango
Yr HardClayGrassCarpet Yr HardClayGrassCarpet
W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win %
18 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 1987 1 2 3 33.3% — — — — — — — — — — — —
19 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 1988 6 4 10 60.0% 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — 1 1 2 50.0%
20 1993 1 2 3 33.3% — — — — — — — — — — — — 1989 9 8 17 52.9% — — — — 1 2 3 33.3% 0 1 1 0.0%
21 1994 0 1 1 0.0% 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — — — — — 1990 7 10 17 41.2% 3 3 6 50.0% 1 3 4 25.0% 0 1 1 0.0%
22 1995 1 2 3 33.3% — — — — — — — — — — — — 1991 11 14 25 44.0% 3 3 6 50.0% 0 2 2 0.0% 2 4 6 33.3%
23 1996 8 9 17 47.1% 6 5 11 54.5% 1 2 3 33.3% 5 2 7 71.4% 1992 17 11 28 60.7% 5 5 10 50.0% 2 3 5 40.0% 4 5 9 44.4%
24 1997 22 11 33 66.7% 9 4 13 69.2% 1 2 3 33.3% 3 4 7 42.9% 1993 14 16 30 46.7% 8 6 14 57.1% 0 2 2 0.0% 2 2 4 50.0%
25 1998 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — 1994 18 18 36 50.0% 4 4 8 50.0% 0 1 1 0.0% 1 4 5 20.0%
26 1999 11 11 22 50.0% 2 4 6 33.3% 6 2 8 75.0% 3 2 5 60.0% 1995 7 14 21 33.3% 4 5 9 44.4% 2 1 3 66.7% 5 4 9 55.6%
27 2000 14 15 29 48.3% 2 5 7 28.6% 1 2 3 33.3% 1 1 2 50.0% 1996 8 7 15 53.3% 2 5 7 28.6% 0 1 1 0.0% 4 5 9 44.4%
28 2001 10 12 22 45.5% 0 3 3 0.0% 1 2 3 33.3% — — — — 1997 20 13 33 60.6% 5 7 12 41.7% 2 3 5 40.0% 4 6 10 40.0%
29 2002 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — 1998 19 18 37 51.4% 2 5 7 28.6% 2 3 5 40.0% 1 3 4 25.0%
30 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 1999 6 11 17 35.3% 5 6 11 45.5% 3 3 6 50.0% 7 4 11 63.6%
31 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2000 2 14 16 12.5% 8 9 17 47.1% 1 2 3 33.3% — — — —
32 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2001 1 6 7 14.3% — — — — 0 1 1 0.0% 0 1 1 0.0%
33 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2002 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — — — — — — — — —
Career — 67 65 132 50.8% 19 22 41 46.3% 10 10 20 50.0% 12 9 21 57.1% — 146 167 313 46.6% 49 59 108 45.4% 14 27 41 34.1% 31 41 72 43.1%

Performance Progression by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. Detailed serve and return statistics available for 179/214 of Chris Woodruff's and 411/468 of Jeff Tarango's main draw matches. Sample is shown as matches with detailed serve and return statistics / total main draw matches. Bold green marks the stronger value when both stat samples contain at least 5 matches; lower is better for DFs/M.

Age Chris Woodruff Jeff Tarango
Yr Sample Aces/M DFs/M 1st Sv% 1st Pts% 2nd Pts% BP Saved% BP Conv% Svc Pts% Ret Pts% Yr Sample Aces/M DFs/M 1st Sv% 1st Pts% 2nd Pts% BP Saved% BP Conv% Svc Pts% Ret Pts%
20 1993 1/3 4.0 4.0 56.3% 71.1% 62.9% 71.4% 33.3% 67.5% 30.0% — —/— — — — — — — — — —
21 1994 2/2 4.0 2.0 66.3% 57.1% 37.5% 52.3% 33.3% 50.9% 34.8% — —/— — — — — — — — — —
22 1995 2/3 1.0 6.0 53.3% 61.4% 47.2% 42.8% 53.3% 54.8% 39.7% 1991 32/39 1.9 5.1 65.8% 64.8% 46.6% 56.0% 48.7% 58.5% 37.0%
23 1996 32/38 6.5 4.0 59.8% 72.0% 48.0% 61.6% 40.1% 62.3% 40.1% 1992 47/52 3.5 3.5 63.1% 67.5% 47.8% 56.6% 42.3% 60.3% 38.7%
24 1997 49/56 6.0 4.2 57.9% 74.0% 50.3% 54.5% 36.3% 64.0% 38.6% 1993 43/50 3.7 4.6 56.6% 68.4% 47.0% 59.2% 45.1% 59.1% 38.5%
25 1998 1/1 8.0 2.0 60.9% 64.3% 48.1% 57.1% 25.0% 58.0% 35.3% 1994 40/50 3.6 2.2 62.1% 65.8% 51.8% 56.4% 46.6% 60.6% 39.0%
26 1999 38/41 5.9 4.2 60.8% 73.5% 49.5% 58.5% 38.8% 64.0% 37.6% 1995 38/42 4.2 3.7 62.9% 70.3% 49.3% 54.4% 44.8% 62.3% 37.0%
27 2000 34/41 6.5 4.2 59.3% 72.4% 49.5% 52.9% 46.7% 63.0% 36.6% 1996 28/32 5.2 3.2 61.9% 68.0% 50.2% 54.3% 39.3% 61.4% 38.0%
28 2001 19/28 4.8 3.8 65.8% 67.7% 45.9% 58.6% 52.2% 60.2% 35.1% 1997 54/60 3.8 3.5 62.3% 69.2% 51.5% 52.2% 45.0% 62.3% 38.9%
29 2002 1/1 4.0 5.0 66.4% 70.7% 39.5% 70.0% 20.0% 60.2% 32.7% 1998 47/53 4.0 4.2 57.7% 67.9% 52.0% 51.3% 46.8% 61.1% 40.1%
30 — —/— — — — — — — — — — 1999 42/45 4.9 4.1 60.6% 67.1% 46.1% 61.0% 43.2% 58.9% 38.4%
31 — —/— — — — — — — — — — 2000 33/36 4.6 5.3 58.1% 68.9% 47.5% 56.9% 42.2% 60.1% 36.0%
32 — —/— — — — — — — — — — 2001 7/9 3.3 2.1 62.4% 61.8% 52.7% 53.7% 51.2% 58.4% 34.3%
Career — 179/214 6.0 4.1 60.1% 72.1% 48.9% 56.8% 41.2% 62.8% 37.8% — 411/534 3.9 3.9 61.0% 67.8% 49.2% 55.7% 44.6% 60.5% 38.2%

Advanced Statistics Comparison by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. Metrics are precomputed from eligible main-draw results; point-stat values use the available detailed sample. Bold green marks the stronger value when both underlying samples are sufficient. Lower is better for Schedule because a negative value means a tougher schedule. Career Schedule is normalized per 100 matches.

Age Chris Woodruff Jeff Tarango
Yr Elo P+ Serve+ Return+ PD TPW% Hard Elo Clay Elo Grass Elo Set Win % Set Margin Dec. Set Tiebreak Pressure+ Schedule Yr Elo P+ Serve+ Return+ PD TPW% Hard Elo Clay Elo Grass Elo Set Win % Set Margin Dec. Set Tiebreak Pressure+ Schedule
18 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 1987 1508 108.5 — — — — +34 — — 20.0% -1.80 0–1 1–1 — -0.19
19 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 1988 1598 124.9 — — — — +37 — — 51.4% -0.26 4–3 (57%) 4–0 (100%) — -0.05
20 1993 1497 110.8 +0.56 +4.55 0.923 48.8% +35 — — 40.0% -0.30 1–1 — — +0.06 1989 1648 118.8 — — — — +7 — -102 46.4% -0.39 3–2 (60%) 2–3 (40%) — +0.12
21 1994 1481 96.1 -2.29 +1.41 0.709 42.7% — — — 0.0% -3.50 — — — -0.15 1990 1607 120.5 — — — — +6 -46 -69 42.0% -0.54 4–6 (40%) 3–5 (38%) — +0.35
22 1995 1486 109.6 +0.15 -0.21 0.879 47.1% +32 — — 28.6% -0.57 — 0–1 — -0.05 1991 1613 132.3 -1.93 -1.26 0.892 48.2% +24 -37 — 41.8% -0.47 8–7 (53%) 7–8 (47%) — +0.07
23 1996 1678 138.2 +1.11 +1.61 1.063 51.3% -22 -65 -97 54.1% +0.48 6–10 (38%) 4–11 (27%) — +0.13 1992 1694 139.2 -0.84 +0.16 0.974 49.7% +28 -96 -139 50.4% +0.10 15–6 (71%) 10–14 (42%) — -1.21
24 1997 1804 146.3 +1.26 +1.60 1.073 51.1% +26 -96 -221 58.0% +0.54 13–6 (68%) 12–11 (52%) — -0.17 1993 1670 136.1 -1.01 -0.06 0.942 49.0% +18 -8 — 45.9% -0.28 12–6 (67%) 2–6 (25%) — -1.60
25 1998 1787 106.1 +1.63 -0.13 0.840 46.7% — — — 0.0% -2.00 — — — -0.07 1994 1655 132.9 -1.13 +0.92 0.992 50.0% +24 -22 — 46.1% -0.03 6–7 (46%) 5–6 (45%) — +1.47
26 1999 1774 139.1 +1.52 +0.86 1.046 50.9% +3 -96 -95 52.4% +0.37 7–5 (58%) 6–13 (32%) — -0.19 1995 1654 144.2 +0.56 -0.03 0.982 49.5% +7 -14 -104 43.3% -0.18 4–6 (40%) 7–10 (41%) — -1.34
27 2000 1695 134.9 +1.03 +0.26 0.990 49.9% +38 -67 -63 45.8% -0.07 9–7 (56%) 5–8 (38%) — -0.59 1996 1620 125.4 -0.16 +0.21 0.984 49.7% +74 -59 — 44.4% -0.35 4–7 (36%) 7–5 (58%) — +0.93
28 2001 1634 127.7 -1.74 -0.84 0.882 48.5% +56 -83 -24 40.8% -0.51 3–4 (43%) 6–5 (55%) — -0.33 1997 1694 143.8 +0.74 +1.18 1.031 50.6% +30 -59 -135 52.9% +0.29 7–11 (39%) 11–12 (48%) — -1.45
29 2002 1593 96.1 -5.60 +0.39 0.822 46.5% — — — 33.3% -1.33 0–1 1–0 — +0.14 1998 1660 141.3 -0.44 +2.15 1.031 50.5% +49 -71 -90 47.8% -0.04 7–14 (33%) 7–12 (37%) — +0.03
30 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 1999 1685 132.2 -2.40 -0.03 0.934 48.9% +15 -75 -110 46.4% -0.07 7–6 (54%) 6–6 (50%) — +1.16
31 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2000 1517 123.9 -0.88 -1.79 0.903 48.4% -8 +82 +47 38.3% -0.57 3–10 (23%) 6–12 (33%) — -0.28
32 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2001 1453 110.6 -0.42 -1.74 0.824 46.7% +20 — — 25.0% -1.60 0–2 1–2 (33%) — +0.01
33 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2002 1447 103.8 — — — — — — — 0.0% -2.50 — — — -0.06
40 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2009 1455 101.8 — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Career — 1838 142.0 +0.83 +0.91 1.016 50.4% +21 -81 -99 50.0% +0.15 39–34 (53%) 34–49 (41%) 97.5 -0.58 — 1788 140.0 -0.70 +0.24 0.968 49.5% +26 -27 -95 45.8% -0.19 84–94 (47%) 79–102 (44%) 95.5 -0.38

Career Rivalries

Each player's five most-played main-draw opponents. The current matchup is highlighted when it appears in a player's top five.