H2H data updated: 2026-07-19 02:51 UTC
Chris Woodruff vs Justin Gimelstob H2H: 2-1
Chris Woodruff holds a 2–1 lead over Justin Gimelstob in their ATP head-to-head. Across 3 main-draw meetings, Chris Woodruff leads 2–1 on hard courts. Most recently, Justin Gimelstob won the 1999 San Jose fourth round 6-4 7-6(3).
Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.
USA
Age 53
Right-Handed
188 cm / 6'2"
H2H
2
–
1
3 main draw meetings
USA
Age 49
Right-Handed
196 cm / 6'5"
H2H Match Log
| Date | Tournament | Category | Round | Surface | Winner | Score | Loser | Match |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Feb 12, 1999* | San Jose | ATP 250 | R16 | Hard | Justin Gimelstob | 6-4 7-6(3) | Chris Woodruff | Match data |
| Aug 11, 1997 | Indianapolis | ATP 250 | R64 | Hard | Chris Woodruff | 3-6 6-4 6-1 | Justin Gimelstob | Match data |
| Mar 12, 1997* | Indian Wells Masters | Masters 1000 | R64 | Hard | Chris Woodruff | 6-4 6-7(7) 6-3 | Justin Gimelstob | Match data |
* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.
Career Comparison
| Player | Current | Peak | Pts | Elo | W | L | Win % | GS | 1000 | Finals | 500 | 250 | Titles |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Chris Woodruff | #1,334 | #29 | 1,273 | 1,829 | 108 | 106 | 50.5% | 0 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 2 |
| Justin Gimelstob | #841 | #63 | 733 | 1,721 | 107 | 171 | 38.5% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
Career Progression by Age
Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.
| Age | Chris Woodruff | Justin Gimelstob | ||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | |
| 18 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1995 | 1–1 | 50.0% | #576 | 1,529 | 0 | 0 |
| 19 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1996 | 3–9 | 25.0% | #152 | 1,509 | 0 | 0 |
| 20 | 1993 | 1–2 | 33.3% | #337 | 1,496 | 0 | 0 | 1997 | 17–23 | 42.5% | #104 | 1,630 | 0 | 0 |
| 21 | 1994 | 0–2 | 0.0% | #300 | 1,480 | 0 | 0 | 1998 | 14–15 | 48.3% | #80 | 1,661 | 0 | 0 |
| 22 | 1995 | 1–2 | 33.3% | #135 | 1,485 | 0 | 0 | 1999 | 17–26 | 39.5% | #82 | 1,645 | 0 | 0 |
| 23 | 1996 | 20–18 | 52.6% | #43 | 1,667 | 0 | 0 | 2000 | 14–16 | 46.7% | #97 | 1,674 | 0 | 0 |
| 24 | 1997 | 35–21 | 62.5% | #30 | 1,777 | 0 | 1 | 2001 | 3–12 | 20.0% | #177 | 1,596 | 0 | 0 |
| 25 | 1998 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #1324 | 1,761 | 0 | 1 | 2002 | 5–6 | 45.5% | #106 | 1,619 | 0 | 0 |
| 26 | 1999 | 22–19 | 53.7% | #51 | 1,770 | 0 | 2 | 2003 | 9–17 | 34.6% | #106 | 1,534 | 0 | 0 |
| 27 | 2000 | 18–23 | 43.9% | #67 | 1,687 | 0 | 2 | 2004 | 1–5 | 16.7% | #162 | 1,508 | 0 | 0 |
| 28 | 2001 | 11–17 | 39.3% | #118 | 1,630 | 0 | 2 | 2005 | 8–9 | 47.1% | #104 | 1,595 | 0 | 0 |
| 29 | 2002 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #496 | 1,589 | 0 | 2 | 2006 | 14–20 | 41.2% | #86 | 1,606 | 0 | 0 |
| 30 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2007 | 1–12 | 7.7% | #556 | 1,536 | 0 | 0 |