H2H data updated: 2026-09-11 00:00 UTC

Chris Woodruff vs Martin Damm Sr H2H: 1-1

Chris Woodruff and Martin Damm Sr are tied 1–1 in their ATP head-to-head. Across 2 main-draw meetings, Martin Damm Sr leads 1–0 on grass, while Chris Woodruff leads 1–0 on hard courts. Most recently, Chris Woodruff won the 2000 Australian Open round of 128 6-3 7-6(3) 6-3.

Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.

Chris Woodruff
USA Age 53 Right-Handed 188 cm / 6'2"
H2H
1 – 1
2 main-draw meetings
Martin Damm Sr
CZE

H2H Match Log

PlayerScorePlayerMatch DataDateRoundTournamentCategorySurface
Chris Woodruff #56 6-3 7-6(3) 6-3 Martin Damm Sr Match data Jan 19, 2000* R128 Australian Open Grand Slam Hard
Martin Damm Sr 6-1 6-7(3) 6-1 Chris Woodruff #61 Match data Jun 20, 1997* R16 Libéma Open World Series → modern equivalent ATP 250 Grass

Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable. Arrows show an edition's recorded category and documented modern equivalent; unresolved editions keep their recorded category. Asterisked totals include editions mapped from documented historical predecessor categories. Mapping details.

Career Comparison

Player Current Peak Pts Elo W L Win % GS 1000 including documented historical predecessor categories Finals 500 including documented historical predecessor categories 250 including documented historical predecessor categories Titles
Chris Woodruff #1,334 #29 1,273 1,838 108 106 50.5% 0 1 0 0 1 2
Martin Damm Sr — — — 1,731 — — — 0 0 0 0 0 0

Career Progression by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.

Chris Woodruff Martin Damm Sr
YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles
1993 1–2 33.3% #337 1,497 0 0 — — — — — — —
1994 0–2 0.0% #300 1,481 0 0 — — — — — — —
1995 1–2 33.3% #135 1,485 0 0 — — — — — — —
1996 20–18 52.6% #43 1,677 0 0 — — — — — — —
1997 35–21 62.5% #30 1,803 0 1 — — — — — — —
1998 0–1 0.0% #1324 1,787 0 1 — — — — — — —
1999 22–19 53.7% #51 1,773 0 2 — — — — — — —
2000 18–23 43.9% #67 1,695 0 2 — — — — — — —
2001 11–17 39.3% #118 1,633 0 2 — — — — — — —
2002 0–1 0.0% #496 1,593 0 2 — — — — — — —

Surface Results by Career Season

Rows are aligned in career order because complete birth data is unavailable. Results cover completed main-draw matches. Bold green marks the higher win percentage when both players have at least 5 matches on that surface at the aligned age.

Chris Woodruff Martin Damm Sr
Yr HardClayGrassCarpet Yr HardClayGrassCarpet
W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win %
1993 1 2 3 33.3% — — — — — — — — — — — — 1989 — — — — 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — — — — —
1994 0 1 1 0.0% 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — — — — — 1990 — — — — 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — — — — —
1995 1 2 3 33.3% — — — — — — — — — — — — 1991 — — — — — — — — — — — — 2 1 3 66.7%
1996 8 9 17 47.1% 6 5 11 54.5% 1 2 3 33.3% 5 2 7 71.4% 1992 6 8 14 42.9% 0 5 5 0.0% 1 1 2 50.0% 1 1 2 50.0%
1997 22 11 33 66.7% 9 4 13 69.2% 1 2 3 33.3% 3 4 7 42.9% 1993 7 11 18 38.9% 1 3 4 25.0% 0 1 1 0.0% 8 6 14 57.1%
1998 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — 1994 7 12 19 36.8% 1 3 4 25.0% 3 2 5 60.0% 4 7 11 36.4%
1999 11 11 22 50.0% 2 4 6 33.3% 6 2 8 75.0% 3 2 5 60.0% 1995 7 13 20 35.0% 0 2 2 0.0% 1 1 2 50.0% 7 6 13 53.8%
2000 14 15 29 48.3% 2 5 7 28.6% 1 2 3 33.3% 1 1 2 50.0% 1996 15 13 28 53.6% 0 2 2 0.0% 4 4 8 50.0% 13 10 23 56.5%
2001 10 12 22 45.5% 0 3 3 0.0% 1 2 3 33.3% — — — — 1997 10 13 23 43.5% 0 3 3 0.0% 3 3 6 50.0% 10 7 17 58.8%
2002 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — 1998 10 14 24 41.7% 0 1 1 0.0% 3 3 6 50.0% 6 8 14 42.9%
— — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 1999 5 9 14 35.7% 1 2 3 33.3% 1 3 4 25.0% 0 2 2 0.0%
— — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2000 6 11 17 35.3% 3 3 6 50.0% 5 2 7 71.4% 0 1 1 0.0%
— — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2001 0 1 1 0.0% 0 2 2 0.0% 1 4 5 20.0% — — — —
— — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2002 1 2 3 33.3% — — — — — — — — — — — —
Career 67 65 132 50.8% 19 22 41 46.3% 10 10 20 50.0% 12 9 21 57.1% Career 74 107 181 40.9% 6 28 34 17.6% 22 24 46 47.8% 51 49 100 51.0%

Advanced Statistics Comparison by Career Season

Rows are aligned in career order because complete birth data is unavailable. Metrics use eligible main-draw results; point statistics use matches with detailed data. Bold green marks the stronger value when both underlying samples are sufficient. Lower is better for Schedule because a negative value means a tougher schedule. Career Schedule is normalized per 100 matches.

Chris Woodruff Martin Damm Sr
Yr Elo P+ Serve+ Return+ PD TPW% Hard Elo Clay Elo Grass Elo Set Win % Set Margin Dec. Set Tiebreak Pressure+ Schedule Yr Elo P+ Serve+ Return+ PD TPW% Hard Elo Clay Elo Grass Elo Set Win % Set Margin Dec. Set Tiebreak Pressure+ Schedule
1993 1497 110.8 +0.56 +4.55 0.923 48.8% +35 — — 40.0% -0.30 1–1 — — +0.06 1989 1492 98.3 — — — — — — — 0.0% -5.00 — — — -0.08
1994 1481 96.1 -2.29 +1.41 0.709 42.7% — — — 0.0% -3.50 — — — -0.15 1990 1478 98.3 — — — — — — — 0.0% -2.50 — — — +0.15
1995 1486 109.6 +0.15 -0.21 0.879 47.1% +32 — — 28.6% -0.57 — 0–1 — -0.05 1991 1504 104.7 — — — — +57 — — 57.1% +0.57 1–0 0–1 — +0.21
1996 1678 138.2 +1.11 +1.61 1.063 51.3% -22 -65 -97 54.1% +0.48 6–10 (38%) 4–11 (27%) 94.9 +0.13 1992 1546 125.4 — — — — +65 -88 — 35.1% -0.91 4–1 (80%) 2–5 (29%) 103.3 +0.26
1997 1804 146.3 +1.26 +1.60 1.073 51.1% +26 -96 -221 58.0% +0.54 13–6 (68%) 12–11 (52%) 106.7 -0.17 1993 1647 128.4 — — — — +28 -196 — 44.8% -0.40 6–6 (50%) 8–5 (62%) 105.4 +0.61
1998 1787 106.1 +1.63 -0.13 0.840 46.7% — — — 0.0% -2.00 — — — -0.07 1994 1630 133.5 — — — — -23 -172 +21 44.4% -0.32 3–13 (19%) 9–10 (47%) 92.4 -0.61
1999 1774 139.1 +1.52 +0.86 1.046 50.9% +3 -96 -95 52.4% +0.37 7–5 (58%) 6–13 (32%) 97.6 -0.19 1995 1619 133.0 — — — — +8 — — 42.3% -0.55 9–8 (53%) 11–11 (50%) 102.9 -0.27
2000 1695 134.9 +1.03 +0.26 0.990 49.9% +38 -67 -63 45.8% -0.07 9–7 (56%) 5–8 (38%) 97.0 -0.59 1996 1709 139.5 — — — — +35 — -23 47.9% -0.08 13–8 (62%) 13–18 (42%) 102.9 +1.26
2001 1634 127.7 -1.74 -0.84 0.882 48.5% +56 -83 -24 40.8% -0.51 3–4 (43%) 6–5 (55%) 99.5 -0.33 1997 1694 135.4 — — — — +35 -281 +7 48.3% -0.18 8–7 (53%) 16–10 (62%) 105.2 +0.62
2002 1593 96.1 -5.60 +0.39 0.822 46.5% — — — 33.3% -1.33 0–1 1–0 — +0.14 1998 1649 132.2 — — — — +16 — +23 42.9% -0.50 7–7 (50%) 8–11 (42%) 98.6 -0.31
— — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 1999 1578 123.5 — — — — +27 -177 +52 39.1% -0.78 1–7 (13%) 3–5 (38%) 90.9 -0.57
— — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2000 1615 127.5 — — — — -72 -159 +102 44.2% -0.34 7–3 (70%) 6–9 (40%) 105.2 +0.30
— — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2001 1514 96.3 — — — — — — +91 15.0% -1.90 — 0–2 — +0.77
— — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2002 1525 111.4 — — — — +15 — — 37.5% -0.75 — 1–1 — -0.13
Career 1838 142.0 +0.83 +0.91 1.016 50.4% +21 -81 -99 50.0% +0.15 39–34 (53%) 34–49 (41%) 97.5 -0.58 Career 1732 136.6 — — — — +17 -170 +36 43.3% -0.43 59–60 (50%) 77–88 (47%) 101.6 +0.62

Career Rivalries

Each player's five most-played main-draw opponents. The current matchup is highlighted when it appears in a player's top five.