H2H data updated: 2026-07-18 14:16 UTC
Chris Woodruff vs Sandon Stolle H2H: 1-1
Chris Woodruff and Sandon Stolle are tied 1–1 in their ATP head-to-head. Across 2 main-draw meetings, Chris Woodruff leads 1–0 on clay, while Sandon Stolle leads 1–0 on grass. Most recently, Sandon Stolle won the 1997 Wimbledon first round 6-2 6-2 6-4.
Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.
USA
Age 53
Right-Handed
188 cm / 6'2"
H2H
1
–
1
2 main draw meetings
AUS
Age 56
Right-Handed
193 cm / 6'4"
H2H Match Log
| Date | Tournament | Category | Round | Surface | Winner | Score | Loser | Match |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Jun 25, 1997* | Wimbledon | Grand Slam | R128 | Grass | Sandon Stolle | 6-2 6-2 6-4 | Chris Woodruff | Match data |
| May 3, 1997* | Atlanta | ATP 250 | QF | Clay | Chris Woodruff | 6-1 4-6 6-3 | Sandon Stolle | Match data |
* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.
Career Comparison
| Player | Current | Peak | Pts | Elo | W | L | Win % | GS | 1000 | Finals | 500 | 250 | Titles |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Chris Woodruff | #1,334 | #29 | 1,273 | 1,829 | 108 | 106 | 50.5% | 0 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 2 |
| Sandon Stolle | #1,379 | #50 | 810 | 1,745 | 100 | 120 | 45.5% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
Career Progression by Age
Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.
| Age | Chris Woodruff | Sandon Stolle | ||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | |
| 18 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1989 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #813 | 1,486 | 0 | 0 |
| 19 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1990 | 2–3 | 40.0% | #228 | 1,513 | 0 | 0 |
| 20 | 1993 | 1–2 | 33.3% | #337 | 1,496 | 0 | 0 | 1991 | 5–7 | 41.7% | #156 | 1,542 | 0 | 0 |
| 21 | 1994 | 0–2 | 0.0% | #300 | 1,480 | 0 | 0 | 1992 | 19–20 | 48.7% | #71 | 1,606 | 0 | 0 |
| 22 | 1995 | 1–2 | 33.3% | #135 | 1,485 | 0 | 0 | 1993 | 8–19 | 29.6% | #182 | 1,577 | 0 | 0 |
| 23 | 1996 | 20–18 | 52.6% | #43 | 1,667 | 0 | 0 | 1994 | 4–6 | 40.0% | #212 | 1,608 | 0 | 0 |
| 24 | 1997 | 35–21 | 62.5% | #30 | 1,777 | 0 | 1 | 1995 | 7–9 | 43.8% | #179 | 1,613 | 0 | 0 |
| 25 | 1998 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #1324 | 1,761 | 0 | 1 | 1996 | 24–20 | 54.5% | #58 | 1,689 | 0 | 0 |
| 26 | 1999 | 22–19 | 53.7% | #51 | 1,770 | 0 | 2 | 1997 | 22–19 | 53.7% | #83 | 1,728 | 0 | 0 |
| 27 | 2000 | 18–23 | 43.9% | #67 | 1,687 | 0 | 2 | 1998 | 6–12 | 33.3% | #238 | 1,621 | 0 | 0 |
| 28 | 2001 | 11–17 | 39.3% | #118 | 1,630 | 0 | 2 | 1999 | 3–4 | 42.9% | #375 | 1,618 | 0 | 0 |
| 29 | 2002 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #496 | 1,589 | 0 | 2 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |