H2H data updated: 2026-07-18 02:15 UTC
Chris Woodruff vs Sargis Sargsian H2H: 2-2
Chris Woodruff and Sargis Sargsian are tied 2–2 in their ATP head-to-head. Across 4 main-draw meetings, they are tied 1–1 on hard courts, while Sargis Sargsian leads 1–0 on clay. Most recently, Chris Woodruff won the 1999 Wimbledon first round 6-3 3-6 6-3 6-7(7) 6-2.
Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.
USA
Age 53
Right-Handed
188 cm / 6'2"
H2H
2
–
2
4 main draw meetings
ARM
Age 53
Right-Handed
180 cm / 5'11"
H2H Match Log
| Date | Tournament | Category | Round | Surface | Winner | Score | Loser | Match |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Jun 23, 1999* | Wimbledon | Grand Slam | R128 | Grass | Chris Woodruff | 6-3 3-6 6-3 6-7(7) 6-2 | Sargis Sargsian | Match data |
| Apr 29, 1999* | Atlanta | ATP 250 | R32 | Clay | Sargis Sargsian | 6-4 6-4 | Chris Woodruff | Match data |
| Aug 29, 1997* | US Open | Grand Slam | R64 | Hard | Sargis Sargsian | (w/o) | Chris Woodruff | Match data |
| Aug 6, 1997* | Cincinnati Masters | Masters 1000 | R64 | Hard | Chris Woodruff | 6-2 6-4 | Sargis Sargsian | Match data |
* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.
Career Comparison
| Player | Current | Peak | Pts | Elo | W | L | Win % | GS | 1000 | Finals | 500 | 250 | Titles |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Chris Woodruff | #1,334 | #29 | 1,273 | 1,829 | 108 | 106 | 50.5% | 0 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 2 |
| Sargis Sargsian | #1,525 | #38 | 978 | 1,811 | 155 | 205 | 43.1% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 1 |
Career Progression by Age
Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.
| Age | Chris Woodruff | Sargis Sargsian | ||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | |
| 20 | 1993 | 1–2 | 33.3% | #337 | 1,496 | 0 | 0 | 1993 | 1–1 | 50.0% | #615 | 1,514 | 0 | 0 |
| 21 | 1994 | 0–2 | 0.0% | #300 | 1,480 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 22 | 1995 | 1–2 | 33.3% | #135 | 1,485 | 0 | 0 | 1995 | 2–2 | 50.0% | #220 | 1,568 | 0 | 0 |
| 23 | 1996 | 20–18 | 52.6% | #43 | 1,667 | 0 | 0 | 1996 | 3–5 | 37.5% | #104 | 1,569 | 0 | 0 |
| 24 | 1997 | 35–21 | 62.5% | #30 | 1,777 | 0 | 1 | 1997 | 18–23 | 43.9% | #69 | 1,674 | 0 | 1 |
| 25 | 1998 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #1324 | 1,761 | 0 | 1 | 1998 | 18–25 | 41.9% | #98 | 1,623 | 0 | 1 |
| 26 | 1999 | 22–19 | 53.7% | #51 | 1,770 | 0 | 2 | 1999 | 21–23 | 47.7% | #59 | 1,637 | 0 | 1 |
| 27 | 2000 | 18–23 | 43.9% | #67 | 1,687 | 0 | 2 | 2000 | 15–25 | 37.5% | #94 | 1,584 | 0 | 1 |
| 28 | 2001 | 11–17 | 39.3% | #118 | 1,630 | 0 | 2 | 2001 | 16–19 | 45.7% | #72 | 1,628 | 0 | 1 |
| 29 | 2002 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #496 | 1,589 | 0 | 2 | 2002 | 13–19 | 40.6% | #103 | 1,650 | 0 | 1 |
| 30 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2003 | 28–26 | 51.9% | #39 | 1,774 | 0 | 1 |
| 31 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2004 | 17–26 | 39.5% | #75 | 1,699 | 0 | 1 |
| 32 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2005 | 3–9 | 25.0% | #294 | 1,588 | 0 | 1 |
| 33 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2006 | 0–2 | 0.0% | #809 | 1,576 | 0 | 1 |