H2H data updated: 2026-07-19 02:51 UTC
Chris Woodruff vs Todd Woodbridge H2H: 2-2
Chris Woodruff and Todd Woodbridge are tied 2–2 in their ATP head-to-head. Across 4 main-draw meetings, Chris Woodruff leads 1–0 on carpet and 1–0 on clay. Most recently, Chris Woodruff won the 2000 Atlanta fourth round 4-6 6-2 6-2.
Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.
USA
Age 53
Right-Handed
188 cm / 6'2"
H2H
2
–
2
4 main draw meetings
AUS
Age 55
Right-Handed
178 cm / 5'10"
H2H Match Log
| Date | Tournament | Category | Round | Surface | Winner | Score | Loser | Match |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Apr 14, 2000* | Atlanta | ATP 250 | R16 | Clay | Chris Woodruff | 4-6 6-2 6-2 | Todd Woodbridge | Match data |
| Jun 21, 1996* | Nottingham | ATP 250 | R16 | Grass | Todd Woodbridge | 7-5 6-4 | Chris Woodruff | Match data |
| Mar 2, 1996* | Philadelphia | ATP 250 | SF | Carpet | Chris Woodruff | 6-4 6-4 | Todd Woodbridge | Match data |
| Aug 30, 1995* | US Open | Grand Slam | R128 | Hard | Todd Woodbridge | 6-4 7-6(5) 6-4 | Chris Woodruff | Match data |
* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.
Career Comparison
| Player | Current | Peak | Pts | Elo | W | L | Win % | GS | 1000 | Finals | 500 | 250 | Titles |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Chris Woodruff | #1,334 | #29 | 1,273 | 1,829 | 108 | 106 | 50.5% | 0 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 2 |
| Todd Woodbridge | #1,151 | #19 | 1,575 | 1,857 | 237 | 229 | 50.9% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 2 | 2 |
Career Progression by Age
Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.
| Age | Chris Woodruff | Todd Woodbridge | ||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | |
| 17 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1988 | 1–6 | 14.3% | #213 | 1,453 | 0 | 0 |
| 18 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1989 | 6–6 | 50.0% | #131 | 1,573 | 0 | 0 |
| 19 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1990 | 16–17 | 48.5% | #50 | 1,704 | 0 | 0 |
| 20 | 1993 | 1–2 | 33.3% | #337 | 1,496 | 0 | 0 | 1991 | 23–25 | 47.9% | #77 | 1,702 | 0 | 0 |
| 21 | 1994 | 0–2 | 0.0% | #300 | 1,480 | 0 | 0 | 1992 | 25–22 | 53.2% | #54 | 1,684 | 0 | 0 |
| 22 | 1995 | 1–2 | 33.3% | #135 | 1,485 | 0 | 0 | 1993 | 19–20 | 48.7% | #109 | 1,664 | 0 | 0 |
| 23 | 1996 | 20–18 | 52.6% | #43 | 1,667 | 0 | 0 | 1994 | 15–19 | 44.1% | #90 | 1,661 | 0 | 0 |
| 24 | 1997 | 35–21 | 62.5% | #30 | 1,777 | 0 | 1 | 1995 | 32–22 | 59.3% | #33 | 1,810 | 0 | 1 |
| 25 | 1998 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #1324 | 1,761 | 0 | 1 | 1996 | 32–23 | 58.2% | #36 | 1,744 | 0 | 1 |
| 26 | 1999 | 22–19 | 53.7% | #51 | 1,770 | 0 | 2 | 1997 | 31–20 | 60.8% | #26 | 1,796 | 0 | 2 |
| 27 | 2000 | 18–23 | 43.9% | #67 | 1,687 | 0 | 2 | 1998 | 21–21 | 50.0% | #65 | 1,714 | 0 | 2 |
| 28 | 2001 | 11–17 | 39.3% | #118 | 1,630 | 0 | 2 | 1999 | 8–16 | 33.3% | #197 | 1,601 | 0 | 2 |
| 29 | 2002 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #496 | 1,589 | 0 | 2 | 2000 | 4–6 | 40.0% | #187 | 1,588 | 0 | 2 |
| 30 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2001 | 4–6 | 40.0% | #207 | 1,596 | 0 | 2 |