H2H data updated: 2026-07-19 02:51 UTC
Chris Woodruff vs Tuomas Ketola H2H: 1-0
Chris Woodruff holds a 1–0 lead over Tuomas Ketola in their ATP head-to-head. Across 1 main-draw meeting, Chris Woodruff leads 1–0 on hard courts. Most recently, Chris Woodruff won the 2000 St. Petersburg third round 6-7(3) 6-3 6-4.
Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.
USA
Age 53
Right-Handed
188 cm / 6'2"
H2H
1
–
0
1 main draw meetings
FIN
Age 51
Right-Handed
185 cm / 6'1"
H2H Match Log
| Date | Tournament | Category | Round | Surface | Winner | Score | Loser | Match |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Nov 9, 2000* | St. Petersburg | ATP 250 | R32 | Hard | Chris Woodruff | 6-7(3) 6-3 6-4 | Tuomas Ketola | Match data |
* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.
Career Comparison
| Player | Current | Peak | Pts | Elo | W | L | Win % | GS | 1000 | Finals | 500 | 250 | Titles |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Chris Woodruff | #1,334 | #29 | 1,273 | 1,829 | 108 | 106 | 50.5% | 0 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 2 |
| Tuomas Ketola | #1,512 | #130 | 360 | 1,598 | 9 | 30 | 23.1% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
Career Progression by Age
Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.
| Age | Chris Woodruff | Tuomas Ketola | ||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | |
| 20 | 1993 | 1–2 | 33.3% | #337 | 1,496 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 21 | 1994 | 0–2 | 0.0% | #300 | 1,480 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 22 | 1995 | 1–2 | 33.3% | #135 | 1,485 | 0 | 0 | 1997 | 0–2 | 0.0% | #144 | 1,473 | 0 | 0 |
| 23 | 1996 | 20–18 | 52.6% | #43 | 1,667 | 0 | 0 | 1998 | 2–9 | 18.2% | #232 | 1,415 | 0 | 0 |
| 24 | 1997 | 35–21 | 62.5% | #30 | 1,777 | 0 | 1 | 1999 | 1–6 | 14.3% | #164 | 1,412 | 0 | 0 |
| 25 | 1998 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #1324 | 1,761 | 0 | 1 | 2000 | 3–5 | 37.5% | #148 | 1,437 | 0 | 0 |
| 26 | 1999 | 22–19 | 53.7% | #51 | 1,770 | 0 | 2 | 2001 | 0–2 | 0.0% | #246 | 1,467 | 0 | 0 |
| 27 | 2000 | 18–23 | 43.9% | #67 | 1,687 | 0 | 2 | 2002 | 1–3 | 25.0% | #171 | 1,520 | 0 | 0 |
| 28 | 2001 | 11–17 | 39.3% | #118 | 1,630 | 0 | 2 | 2003 | 1–1 | 50.0% | #172 | 1,520 | 0 | 0 |
| 29 | 2002 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #496 | 1,589 | 0 | 2 | 2004 | 1–1 | 50.0% | #236 | 1,566 | 0 | 0 |
| 30 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2005 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #430 | 1,566 | 0 | 0 |