H2H data updated: 2026-07-18 17:48 UTC
Chris Woodruff vs Vincent Spadea H2H: 1-0
Chris Woodruff holds a 1–0 lead over Vincent Spadea in their ATP head-to-head. Across 1 main-draw meeting, Chris Woodruff leads 1–0 on clay. Most recently, Chris Woodruff won the 1996 Roland Garros first round 6-2 6-2 3-6 7-6(4).
Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.
USA
Age 53
Right-Handed
188 cm / 6'2"
H2H
1
–
0
1 main draw meetings
USA
Right-Handed
183 cm / 6'0"
H2H Match Log
| Date | Tournament | Category | Round | Surface | Winner | Score | Loser | Match |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| May 29, 1996* | Roland Garros | Grand Slam | R128 | Clay | Chris Woodruff | 6-2 6-2 3-6 7-6(4) | Vincent Spadea | Match data |
* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.
Career Comparison
| Player | Current | Peak | Pts | Elo | W | L | Win % | GS | 1000 | Finals | 500 | 250 | Titles |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Chris Woodruff | #1,334 | #29 | 1,273 | 1,829 | 108 | 106 | 50.5% | 0 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 2 |
| Vincent Spadea | #1,474 | #18 | 1,629 | 1,876 | 310 | 348 | 47.1% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 1 |
Career Progression by Age
Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.
| Chris Woodruff | Vincent Spadea | ||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles |
| 1993 | 1–2 | 33.3% | #337 | 1,496 | 0 | 0 | 1993 | 1–5 | 16.7% | #303 | 1,483 | 0 | 0 |
| 1994 | 0–2 | 0.0% | #300 | 1,480 | 0 | 0 | 1994 | 11–13 | 45.8% | #75 | 1,561 | 0 | 0 |
| 1995 | 1–2 | 33.3% | #135 | 1,485 | 0 | 0 | 1995 | 21–28 | 42.9% | #81 | 1,639 | 0 | 0 |
| 1996 | 20–18 | 52.6% | #43 | 1,667 | 0 | 0 | 1996 | 27–22 | 55.1% | #54 | 1,711 | 0 | 0 |
| 1997 | 35–21 | 62.5% | #30 | 1,777 | 0 | 1 | 1997 | 20–26 | 43.5% | #88 | 1,695 | 0 | 0 |
| 1998 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #1324 | 1,761 | 0 | 1 | 1998 | 28–27 | 50.9% | #42 | 1,752 | 0 | 0 |
| 1999 | 22–19 | 53.7% | #51 | 1,770 | 0 | 2 | 1999 | 33–27 | 55.0% | #20 | 1,763 | 0 | 0 |
| 2000 | 18–23 | 43.9% | #67 | 1,687 | 0 | 2 | 2000 | 3–23 | 11.5% | #213 | 1,545 | 0 | 0 |
| 2001 | 11–17 | 39.3% | #118 | 1,630 | 0 | 2 | 2001 | 1–3 | 25.0% | #125 | 1,534 | 0 | 0 |
| 2002 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #496 | 1,589 | 0 | 2 | 2002 | 13–17 | 43.3% | #67 | 1,623 | 0 | 0 |
| — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2003 | 34–25 | 57.6% | #29 | 1,723 | 0 | 0 |
| — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2004 | 39–25 | 60.9% | #20 | 1,784 | 0 | 1 |
| — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2005 | 21–24 | 46.7% | #75 | 1,665 | 0 | 1 |
| — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2006 | 19–26 | 42.2% | #73 | 1,627 | 0 | 1 |
| — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2007 | 24–28 | 46.2% | #77 | 1,650 | 0 | 1 |
| — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2008 | 13–19 | 40.6% | #76 | 1,657 | 0 | 1 |
| — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2009 | 2–9 | 18.2% | #295 | 1,526 | 0 | 1 |
| — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2010 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #1517 | 1,480 | 0 | 1 |