H2H data updated: 2026-10-26 00:00 UTC

Christian Ruud vs Clemens Trimmel

Compare the head-to-head record, career totals, season-by-season performance, and match log for Christian Ruud vs Clemens Trimmel.

NOR Age 54 Right-Handed 188 cm / 6'2"
H2H
0 – 0
0 main-draw meetings
AUT Age 48 Right-Handed 185 cm / 6'1"

H2H Match Log

PlayerScorePlayerMatch DataDateRoundTournamentCategorySurface
Christian Ruud #173 6-4 3-6 6-2 Clemens Trimmel #169 Match data May 29, 2001* Q3 Q Roland Garros Grand Slam Clay

1 qualifying meeting shown in the table; qualifying is excluded from the H2H score. Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable. Arrows show an edition's recorded category and documented modern equivalent; unresolved editions keep their recorded category. Asterisked totals include editions mapped from documented historical predecessor categories. Mapping details.

Career Comparison

Player Current Peak Pts Elo W L Win % GS 1000 including documented historical predecessor categories Finals 500 including documented historical predecessor categories 250 including documented historical predecessor categories Titles
Christian Ruud — #39 1,006 1,772 100 131 43.3% 0 0 0 0 0 0
Clemens Trimmel — #147 267 1,500 1 7 12.5% 0 0 0 0 0 0

Career Progression by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.

Age Christian Ruud Clemens Trimmel
YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles
17 — — — — — — — 1995 0–2 0.0% #411 1,477 0 0
18 — — — — — — — 1996 0–1 0.0% #658 1,468 0 0
19 1992 0–2 0.0% #291 1,491 0 0 1997 1–1 50.0% #296 1,490 0 0
20 1993 1–2 33.3% #146 1,499 0 0 1998 0–1 0.0% #448 1,487 0 0
21 1994 2–4 33.3% #84 1,518 0 0 — — — — — — —
22 1995 15–24 38.5% #75 1,582 0 0 2000 0–2 0.0% #200 1,465 0 0
23 1996 24–24 50.0% #59 1,663 0 0 — — — — — — —
24 1997 23–25 47.9% #65 1,622 0 0 — — — — — — —
25 1998 2–13 13.3% #86 1,492 0 0 — — — — — — —
26 1999 22–17 56.4% #67 1,649 0 0 — — — — — — —
27 2000 8–17 32.0% #144 1,575 0 0 — — — — — — —
28 2001 3–3 50.0% #290 1,605 0 0 — — — — — — —

Surface Results by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. Results cover completed main-draw matches. Bold green marks the higher win percentage when both players have at least 5 matches on that surface at the aligned age.

Age Christian Ruud Clemens Trimmel
Yr HardClayGrassCarpet Yr HardClayGrassCarpet
W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win %
17 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 1995 — — — — 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — 0 1 1 0.0%
18 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 1996 — — — — 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — — — — —
19 1992 0 1 1 0.0% 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — — — — — 1997 — — — — 1 1 2 50.0% — — — — — — — —
20 1993 0 1 1 0.0% 1 1 2 50.0% — — — — — — — — 1998 — — — — 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — — — — —
21 1994 — — — — 2 4 6 33.3% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
22 1995 1 7 8 12.5% 14 15 29 48.3% 0 1 1 0.0% 0 1 1 0.0% 2000 — — — — 0 2 2 0.0% — — — — — — — —
23 1996 4 8 12 33.3% 20 14 34 58.8% 0 1 1 0.0% 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
24 1997 9 10 19 47.4% 14 13 27 51.9% 0 1 1 0.0% 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
25 1998 0 7 7 0.0% 2 6 8 25.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
26 1999 8 6 14 57.1% 14 10 24 58.3% 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
27 2000 1 5 6 16.7% 7 9 16 43.8% 0 2 2 0.0% 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
28 2001 — — — — 3 3 6 50.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Career — 23 45 68 33.8% 77 76 153 50.3% 0 6 6 0.0% 0 4 4 0.0% — — — — — 1 6 7 14.3% — — — — 0 1 1 0.0%

Performance Progression by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. Detailed serve and return statistics available for 187/231 of Christian Ruud's and 7/8 of Clemens Trimmel's main draw matches. Sample is shown as matches with detailed serve and return statistics / total main draw matches. Bold green marks the stronger value when both stat samples contain at least 5 matches; lower is better for DFs/M.

Age Christian Ruud Clemens Trimmel
Yr Sample Aces/M DFs/M 1st Sv% 1st Pts% 2nd Pts% BP Saved% BP Conv% Svc Pts% Ret Pts% Yr Sample Aces/M DFs/M 1st Sv% 1st Pts% 2nd Pts% BP Saved% BP Conv% Svc Pts% Ret Pts%
17 — —/— — — — — — — — — — 1995 1/2 4.0 6.0 56.9% 62.9% 46.8% 50.0% 33.3% 56.0% 39.8%
18 — —/— — — — — — — — — — 1996 1/1 2.0 5.0 58.8% 59.6% 48.5% 60.0% 33.3% 55.0% 40.5%
19 1992 1/2 3.0 5.0 62.5% 60.0% 38.1% 50.0% 33.3% 51.8% 30.5% 1997 2/2 3.0 6.0 57.6% 65.1% 47.7% 55.8% 41.7% 57.2% 39.2%
20 1993 3/3 0.0 3.3 66.7% 59.6% 54.5% 52.8% 47.1% 57.8% 40.8% 1998 1/1 1.0 4.0 67.0% 63.9% 46.7% 66.7% 75.0% 58.2% 32.5%
21 1994 6/6 2.0 2.2 60.6% 65.3% 45.7% 46.7% 49.7% 57.3% 43.1% — —/— — — — — — — — — —
22 1995 34/39 2.5 3.4 59.1% 60.4% 41.8% 49.4% 45.0% 53.2% 41.5% 2000 2/2 3.0 3.5 54.7% 70.8% 35.4% 55.0% 33.3% 53.8% 29.9%
23 1996 36/48 2.2 2.6 59.2% 64.7% 47.8% 49.6% 49.1% 57.6% 40.3% — —/— — — — — — — — — —
24 1997 37/48 2.7 2.7 56.4% 64.4% 49.1% 50.9% 41.7% 57.6% 38.0% — —/— — — — — — — — — —
25 1998 12/15 3.1 3.3 57.1% 63.9% 49.5% 56.3% 33.9% 57.4% 34.5% — —/— — — — — — — — — —
26 1999 34/39 2.3 3.0 61.6% 63.5% 48.2% 52.1% 39.4% 57.4% 40.4% — —/— — — — — — — — — —
27 2000 20/25 3.0 2.9 57.6% 62.5% 49.0% 48.7% 43.3% 56.6% 38.4% — —/— — — — — — — — — —
28 2001 4/6 4.8 2.0 58.6% 62.8% 50.2% 66.6% 21.0% 57.4% 37.0% — —/— — — — — — — — — —
Career — 187/231 2.5 2.9 58.9% 63.2% 47.3% 50.9% 42.9% 56.6% 39.5% — 7/8 2.7 4.9 58.2% 65.4% 44.0% 56.9% 41.7% 55.9% 35.9%

Advanced Statistics Comparison by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. Metrics use eligible main-draw results; point statistics use matches with detailed data. Bold green marks the stronger value when both underlying samples are sufficient. Lower is better for Schedule because a negative value means a tougher schedule. Career Schedule is normalized per 100 matches.

Age Christian Ruud Clemens Trimmel
Yr Elo P+ Serve+ Return+ PD TPW% Hard Elo Clay Elo Grass Elo Set Win % Set Margin Dec. Set Tiebreak Pressure+ Schedule Yr Elo P+ Serve+ Return+ PD TPW% Hard Elo Clay Elo Grass Elo Set Win % Set Margin Dec. Set Tiebreak Pressure+ Schedule
17 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 1995 1477 102.1 +0.58 -1.92 0.904 47.7% — — — 20.0% -1.80 0–1 1–0 — -0.06
18 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 1996 1468 103.9 -1.42 -3.08 0.899 47.6% — — — 33.3% -0.67 0–1 — — -0.02
19 1992 1492 112.1 -0.25 +1.77 0.633 42.0% — — — 25.0% -1.00 — 0–3 (0%) — -0.32 1997 1491 105.2 +1.24 +1.07 0.915 48.2% — — — 40.0% -1.00 1–0 — — -0.27
20 1993 1500 114.3 +0.45 +1.01 0.968 49.4% — — — 44.4% +0.11 1–2 (33%) — — -0.13 1998 1488 108.9 +1.65 -0.39 0.778 46.2% — — — 33.3% -1.67 0–1 — — -0.22
21 1994 1519 122.2 +1.49 +0.44 1.010 50.3% — +33 — 43.8% -0.25 0–2 1–2 (33%) — -0.15 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
22 1995 1583 125.3 -5.10 +2.36 0.887 47.4% -120 +57 — 38.3% -0.77 5–4 (56%) 7–5 (58%) 104.3 -0.03 2000 1466 96.0 -0.42 -0.39 0.646 41.7% — — — 20.0% -3.20 0–1 — — +0.06
23 1996 1664 133.1 -3.24 +1.31 0.950 48.9% -195 +86 — 48.7% -0.05 5–8 (38%) 5–4 (56%) 101.1 +0.32 2001 1474 102.1 — — — — — — — — — — — — —
24 1997 1623 135.6 -2.88 +0.25 0.894 47.7% -58 +111 — 48.8% -0.35 10–10 (50%) 10–8 (56%) 105.6 -0.63 2002 1460 97.0 — — — — — — — — — — — — —
25 1998 1492 114.5 -3.03 -2.68 0.808 45.9% +10 +133 — 28.2% -0.97 0–6 (0%) 2–3 (40%) 92.4 +0.17 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
26 1999 1650 127.8 -3.52 +1.22 0.948 49.0% -36 +31 — 55.4% +0.19 5–3 (63%) 8–1 (89%) 107.6 +1.46 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
27 2000 1575 122.0 -3.21 +0.53 0.885 47.6% -19 +64 — 35.0% -0.92 2–4 (33%) 1–5 (17%) 95.3 -0.84 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
28 2001 1605 108.7 -2.68 -2.76 0.868 45.9% — +52 — 58.3% +0.33 1–1 1–0 — +0.44 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Career — 1773 133.6 -3.30 +0.82 0.909 48.0% -76 +73 — 44.9% -0.36 29–40 (42%) 35–31 (53%) 103.0 +0.13 — 1500 105.3 +0.35 -0.58 0.812 45.9% — — — 28.6% -1.76 1–4 (20%) 1–0 — -6.38

Career Rivalries

Each player's five most-played main-draw opponents. The current matchup is highlighted when it appears in a player's top five.