H2H data updated: 2026-07-17 14:15 UTC
Christian Saceanu vs Michiel Schapers H2H: 1-3
Michiel Schapers holds a 3–1 lead over Christian Saceanu in their ATP head-to-head. Across 4 main-draw meetings, Michiel Schapers leads 2–0 on hard courts and 1–0 on carpet. Most recently, Michiel Schapers won the 1992 Memphis second round 6-3 6-7(5) 6-3.
Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.
GER
Age 58
Right-Handed
190 cm / 6'3"
H2H
1
–
3
4 main draw meetings
NED
Age 66
Right-Handed
201 cm / 6'7"
H2H Match Log
| Date | Tournament | Category | Round | Surface | Winner | Score | Loser | Match |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Feb 12, 1992* | Memphis | ATP 250 | R64 | Hard | Michiel Schapers | 6-3 6-7(5) 6-3 | Christian Saceanu | Match data |
| Feb 6, 1992* | San Francisco | ATP 250 | R32 | Hard | Michiel Schapers | 5-7 7-6(5) 6-3 | Christian Saceanu | Match data |
| Jun 16, 1991* | Rosmalen | ATP 250 | F | Grass | Christian Saceanu | 6-1 3-6 7-5 | Michiel Schapers | Match data |
| Feb 13, 1988* | Rotterdam | ATP 250 | QF | Carpet | Michiel Schapers | 6-2 4-6 7-6 | Christian Saceanu | Match data |
* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.
Career Comparison
| Player | Current | Peak | Pts | Elo | W | L | Win % | GS | 1000 | Finals | 500 | 250 | Titles |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Christian Saceanu | #1,093 | #60 | 509 | 1,709 | 71 | 112 | 38.8% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 2 | 2 |
| Michiel Schapers | #1,230 | #25 | 606 | 1,841 | 151 | 176 | 46.2% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
Career Progression by Age
Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.
| Age | Christian Saceanu | Michiel Schapers | ||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | |
| 16 | 1985 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #479 | 1,486 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 17 | 1986 | 0–3 | 0.0% | #239 | 1,442 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 18 | 1987 | 8–11 | 42.1% | #84 | 1,527 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 19 | 1988 | 21–20 | 51.2% | #88 | 1,654 | 0 | 1 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 20 | 1989 | 13–18 | 41.9% | #160 | 1,590 | 0 | 1 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 21 | 1990 | 3–9 | 25.0% | #153 | 1,544 | 0 | 1 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 22 | 1991 | 15–20 | 42.9% | #84 | 1,563 | 0 | 2 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 23 | 1992 | 8–16 | 33.3% | #118 | 1,601 | 0 | 2 | 1983 | 9–14 | 39.1% | #95 | 1,593 | 0 | 0 |
| 24 | 1993 | 1–12 | 7.7% | #530 | 1,454 | 0 | 2 | 1984 | 10–11 | 47.6% | #78 | 1,651 | 0 | 0 |
| 25 | 1994 | 2–2 | 50.0% | #289 | 1,485 | 0 | 2 | 1985 | 12–19 | 38.7% | #105 | 1,646 | 0 | 0 |
| 26 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1986 | 20–23 | 46.5% | #84 | 1,632 | 0 | 0 |
| 27 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1987 | 26–20 | 56.5% | #49 | 1,718 | 0 | 0 |
| 28 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1988 | 24–19 | 55.8% | #50 | 1,720 | 0 | 0 |
| 29 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1989 | 19–18 | 51.4% | #79 | 1,658 | 0 | 0 |
| 30 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1990 | 5–13 | 27.8% | #169 | 1,558 | 0 | 0 |
| 31 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1991 | 6–5 | 54.5% | #85 | 1,611 | 0 | 0 |
| 32 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1992 | 17–26 | 39.5% | #103 | 1,590 | 0 | 0 |
| 33 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1993 | 3–8 | 27.3% | #270 | 1,525 | 0 | 0 |