H2H data updated: 2026-09-03 00:00 UTC

Christian Saceanu vs Tomas Smid H2H: 0-1

Tomas Smid holds a 1–0 lead over Christian Saceanu in their ATP head-to-head. Across 1 main-draw meeting, Tomas Smid leads 1–0 on clay. Most recently, Tomas Smid won the 1986 Hamburg Open round of 64 7-6 6-3.

Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.

Christian Saceanu
GER Age 58 Right-Handed 190 cm / 6'3"
H2H
0 – 1
1 main draw meetings
Tomas Smid
CZE Age 70 Right-Handed 190 cm / 6'3"

H2H Match Log

PlayerScorePlayerMatch DataDateRoundTournamentCategorySurface
Tomas Smid #46 7-6 6-3 Christian Saceanu #221 Match data Sep 17, 1986* R64 Hamburg Open ATP 250 Clay

Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable. Arrows show an edition's recorded category and documented modern equivalent; unresolved editions keep their recorded category. Asterisked totals include editions mapped from documented historical predecessor categories. Mapping details.

Career Comparison

Player Current Peak Pts Elo W L Win % GS 1000 including documented historical predecessor categories Finals 500 including documented historical predecessor categories 250 including documented historical predecessor categories Titles
Christian Saceanu #1,093 #60 509 1,713 71 112 38.8% 0 0 0 0 2 2
Tomas Smid #975 #11 28 1,994 490 317 60.7% 0 0 0 0 9 9

Career Progression by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.

Age Christian Saceanu Tomas Smid
YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles
16 1985 0–1 0.0% #479 1,486 0 0 — — — — — — —
17 1986 0–3 0.0% #239 1,442 0 0 — — — — — — —
18 1987 8–11 42.1% #84 1,527 0 0 — — — — — — —
19 1988 21–20 51.2% #88 1,669 0 1 — — — — — — —
20 1989 13–18 41.9% #160 1,594 0 1 1976 5–7 41.7% #154 1,542 0 0
21 1990 3–9 25.0% #153 1,553 0 1 1977 16–18 47.1% #62 1,639 0 0
22 1991 15–20 42.9% #84 1,565 0 2 1978 36–25 59.0% #36 1,799 0 1
23 1992 8–16 33.3% #118 1,602 0 2 1979 50–25 66.7% #27 1,871 0 2
24 1993 1–12 7.7% #530 1,456 0 2 1980 43–20 68.3% #23 1,923 0 4
25 1994 2–2 50.0% #289 1,487 0 2 1981 49–28 63.6% #28 1,854 0 4
26 — — — — — — — 1982 62–28 68.9% #24 1,893 0 6
27 — — — — — — — 1983 59–30 66.3% #17 1,903 0 8
28 — — — — — — — 1984 46–27 63.0% #16 1,840 0 8
29 — — — — — — — 1985 47–27 63.5% #19 1,804 0 9
30 — — — — — — — 1986 28–24 53.8% #54 1,723 0 9
31 — — — — — — — 1987 30–26 53.6% #31 1,730 0 9
32 — — — — — — — 1988 17–23 42.5% #115 1,657 0 9
33 — — — — — — — 1989 2–9 18.2% #453 1,536 0 9

Surface Results by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. Results cover completed main-draw matches. Bold green marks the higher win percentage when both players have at least 5 matches on that surface at the aligned age.

Age Christian Saceanu Tomas Smid
Yr HardClayGrassCarpet Yr HardClayGrassCarpet
W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win %
16 1985 — — — — 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
17 1986 0 1 1 0.0% 0 1 1 0.0% 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
18 1987 8 7 15 53.3% 0 1 1 0.0% 0 2 2 0.0% 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
19 1988 5 10 15 33.3% 1 2 3 33.3% 6 2 8 75.0% 9 6 15 60.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
20 1989 5 8 13 38.5% 3 2 5 60.0% 4 4 8 50.0% 1 4 5 20.0% 1976 0 1 1 0.0% 4 3 7 57.1% — — — — 1 3 4 25.0%
21 1990 0 5 5 0.0% 3 3 6 50.0% 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — 1977 4 5 9 44.4% 10 8 18 55.6% 1 2 3 33.3% 1 3 4 25.0%
22 1991 2 5 7 28.6% 2 6 8 25.0% 8 3 11 72.7% 3 6 9 33.3% 1978 4 5 9 44.4% 22 12 34 64.7% 0 1 1 0.0% 10 7 17 58.8%
23 1992 0 9 9 0.0% 1 1 2 50.0% 4 3 7 57.1% 3 3 6 50.0% 1979 6 4 10 60.0% 33 12 45 73.3% 1 1 2 50.0% 10 8 18 55.6%
24 1993 0 7 7 0.0% 0 2 2 0.0% 0 2 2 0.0% 1 1 2 50.0% 1980 15 6 21 71.4% 16 7 23 69.6% — — — — 12 7 19 63.2%
25 1994 1 1 2 50.0% — — — — 1 1 2 50.0% — — — — 1981 15 7 22 68.2% 23 11 34 67.6% 0 1 1 0.0% 11 9 20 55.0%
26 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 1982 10 4 14 71.4% 24 11 35 68.6% 2 1 3 66.7% 26 12 38 68.4%
27 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 1983 10 6 16 62.5% 36 12 48 75.0% 5 3 8 62.5% 8 9 17 47.1%
28 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 1984 10 4 14 71.4% 15 11 26 57.7% 4 1 5 80.0% 17 11 28 60.7%
29 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 1985 18 9 27 66.7% 18 7 25 72.0% 1 2 3 33.3% 10 9 19 52.6%
30 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 1986 7 5 12 58.3% 15 11 26 57.7% 2 1 3 66.7% 4 7 11 36.4%
31 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 1987 6 8 14 42.9% 18 11 29 62.1% 1 1 2 50.0% 5 6 11 45.5%
32 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 1988 6 6 12 50.0% 11 11 22 50.0% 0 1 1 0.0% 0 5 5 0.0%
33 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 1989 0 1 1 0.0% 2 8 10 20.0% — — — — — — — —
Career — 21 53 74 28.4% 10 19 29 34.5% 23 19 42 54.8% 17 21 38 44.7% — 111 71 182 61.0% 247 135 382 64.7% 17 15 32 53.1% 115 96 211 54.5%

Advanced Statistics Comparison by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. Metrics are precomputed from eligible main-draw results; point-stat values use the available detailed sample. Bold green marks the stronger value when both underlying samples are sufficient. Lower is better for Schedule because a negative value means a tougher schedule. Career Schedule is normalized per 100 matches.

Age Christian Saceanu Tomas Smid
Yr Elo P+ Serve+ Return+ PD TPW% Hard Elo Clay Elo Grass Elo Set Win % Set Margin Dec. Set Tiebreak Pressure+ Schedule Yr Elo P+ Serve+ Return+ PD TPW% Hard Elo Clay Elo Grass Elo Set Win % Set Margin Dec. Set Tiebreak Pressure+ Schedule
16 1985 1487 98.7 — — — — — — — 0.0% -3.50 — — — +0.09 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
17 1986 1443 102.9 — — — — — — — 22.2% -1.11 0–1 1–2 (33%) — +0.37 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
18 1987 1527 124.6 — — — — +53 — — 46.2% -0.19 3–5 (38%) 3–5 (38%) — +0.44 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
19 1988 1670 135.5 — — — — -17 -155 -71 52.4% +0.27 6–6 (50%) 6–9 (40%) — -0.13 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
20 1989 1594 116.8 — — — — -37 -47 +25 43.9% -0.57 5–4 (56%) 6–8 (43%) — +0.67 1976 1542 125.7 — — — — -33 +68 — 51.6% +0.16 0–5 (0%) 2–4 (33%) — +0.89
21 1990 1554 109.0 — — — — -45 +41 — 30.8% -1.15 2–2 (50%) 1–3 (25%) — +0.07 1977 1639 136.8 — — — — -104 +44 -135 51.3% +0.20 1–7 (13%) 2–6 (25%) — +1.24
22 1991 1566 124.4 +2.09 -2.84 1.013 50.1% -62 -29 +140 46.4% -0.14 5–9 (36%) 10–6 (63%) — +0.13 1978 1799 150.6 — — — — -122 +63 — 54.8% +0.44 11–8 (58%) 8–7 (53%) — +0.34
23 1992 1602 108.4 -2.03 -2.22 0.833 47.1% -147 — +123 39.4% -0.89 5–7 (42%) 8–7 (53%) — +0.06 1979 1871 159.1 — — — — -70 +110 — 63.8% +0.89 7–7 (50%) 12–6 (67%) — -1.69
24 1993 1456 99.2 -3.84 -1.71 0.818 45.9% -63 — — 16.7% -1.83 0–3 (0%) 2–3 (40%) — +0.69 1980 1923 155.5 — — — — +11 +3 — 65.7% +0.98 7–5 (58%) 6–2 (75%) — -2.22
25 1994 1487 104.1 -0.77 -1.82 0.854 47.2% — — — 45.5% -0.27 1–0 — — +0.30 1981 1854 157.2 — — — — +46 +62 — 60.1% +0.90 11–6 (65%) 15–9 (63%) — -1.40
26 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 1982 1894 156.3 — — — — +23 +3 -326 63.8% +1.01 16–10 (62%) 14–11 (56%) — -0.62
27 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 1983 1903 155.6 — — — — -53 +56 -203 61.5% +0.89 12–9 (57%) 6–10 (38%) — -2.90
28 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 1984 1841 154.8 — — — — +61 -25 -66 59.9% +0.58 10–7 (59%) 10–11 (48%) — -1.32
29 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 1985 1805 149.1 — — — — +56 +68 -70 59.1% +0.51 14–6 (70%) 13–8 (62%) — +1.83
30 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 1986 1724 130.9 — — — — +7 +71 +37 52.3% +0.30 10–7 (59%) 6–15 (29%) — +1.95
31 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 1987 1731 138.3 — — — — -67 +83 — 53.2% +0.07 7–10 (41%) 16–9 (64%) — -0.84
32 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 1988 1657 139.2 — — — — +9 +87 — 41.8% -0.36 7–5 (58%) 4–7 (36%) — -2.59
33 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 1989 1537 102.8 — — — — — +74 — 25.9% -1.52 1–2 (33%) 0–3 (0%) — +0.70
Career — 1713 124.2 -0.25 -2.41 0.912 48.3% -40 -31 +60 42.9% -0.43 27–37 (42%) 37–43 (46%) 97.1 +1.49 — 1994 155.1 — — — — -3 +56 -137 58.0% +0.58 114–94 (55%) 114–108 (51%) 99.2 -0.82

Career Rivalries

Each player's five most-played main-draw opponents. The current matchup is highlighted when it appears in a player's top five.