H2H data updated: 2026-07-18 19:16 UTC
Christophe Rochus vs Albert Portas H2H: 0-1
Albert Portas holds a 1–0 lead over Christophe Rochus in their ATP head-to-head. Across 1 main-draw meeting, Albert Portas leads 1–0 on clay. Most recently, Albert Portas won the 2005 Bucharest third round 6-4 6-1.
Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.
BEL
Age 47
Right-Handed
170 cm / 5'7"
H2H
0
–
1
1 main draw meetings
ESP
Age 52
Right-Handed
188 cm / 6'2"
H2H Match Log
| Date | Tournament | Category | Round | Surface | Winner | Score | Loser | Match |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Sep 15, 2005* | Bucharest | ATP 250 | R32 | Clay | Albert Portas | 6-4 6-1 | Christophe Rochus | Match data |
* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.
Career Comparison
| Player | Current | Peak | Pts | Elo | W | L | Win % | GS | 1000 | Finals | 500 | 250 | Titles |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Christophe Rochus | #998 | #38 | 1,248 | 1,740 | 114 | 208 | 35.4% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Albert Portas | #1,082 | #19 | 1,350 | 1,826 | 142 | 198 | 41.8% | 0 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 |
Career Progression by Age
Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.
| Age | Christophe Rochus | Albert Portas | ||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | |
| 19 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1993 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #392 | 1,489 | 0 | 0 |
| 20 | 1999 | 1–2 | 33.3% | #121 | 1,502 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 21 | 2000 | 14–22 | 38.9% | #74 | 1,555 | 0 | 0 | 1995 | 4–3 | 57.1% | #119 | 1,548 | 0 | 0 |
| 22 | 2001 | 14–21 | 40.0% | #69 | 1,617 | 0 | 0 | 1996 | 0–4 | 0.0% | #182 | 1,505 | 0 | 0 |
| 23 | 2002 | 10–21 | 32.3% | #143 | 1,516 | 0 | 0 | 1997 | 22–17 | 56.4% | #35 | 1,623 | 0 | 0 |
| 24 | 2003 | 12–18 | 40.0% | #84 | 1,573 | 0 | 0 | 1998 | 13–24 | 35.1% | #84 | 1,594 | 0 | 0 |
| 25 | 2004 | 9–18 | 33.3% | #113 | 1,561 | 0 | 0 | 1999 | 14–18 | 43.8% | #90 | 1,599 | 0 | 0 |
| 26 | 2005 | 18–26 | 40.9% | #41 | 1,554 | 0 | 0 | 2000 | 22–23 | 48.9% | #51 | 1,634 | 0 | 0 |
| 27 | 2006 | 15–26 | 36.6% | #78 | 1,538 | 0 | 0 | 2001 | 32–28 | 53.3% | #20 | 1,684 | 0 | 1 |
| 28 | 2007 | 2–9 | 18.2% | #194 | 1,609 | 0 | 0 | 2002 | 9–23 | 28.1% | #88 | 1,525 | 0 | 1 |
| 29 | 2008 | 5–7 | 41.7% | #69 | 1,689 | 0 | 0 | 2003 | 10–20 | 33.3% | #85 | 1,523 | 0 | 1 |
| 30 | 2009 | 14–28 | 33.3% | #86 | 1,610 | 0 | 0 | 2004 | 4–16 | 20.0% | #175 | 1,443 | 0 | 1 |
| 31 | 2010 | 0–10 | 0.0% | #249 | 1,551 | 0 | 0 | 2005 | 2–6 | 25.0% | #119 | 1,437 | 0 | 1 |
| 32 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2006 | 8–12 | 40.0% | #140 | 1,521 | 0 | 1 |
| 33 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2007 | 2–3 | 40.0% | #338 | 1,548 | 0 | 1 |