H2H data updated: 2026-07-19 08:25 UTC
Christophe Rochus vs Andrew Ilie H2H: 2-0
Christophe Rochus holds a 2–0 lead over Andrew Ilie in their ATP head-to-head. Across 2 main-draw meetings, Christophe Rochus leads 2–0 on hard courts. Most recently, Christophe Rochus won the 2001 Adelaide third round 1-6 7-6(2) 7-5.
Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.
BEL
Age 47
Right-Handed
170 cm / 5'7"
H2H
2
–
0
2 main draw meetings
AUS
Age 50
Right-Handed
180 cm / 5'11"
H2H Match Log
| Date | Tournament | Category | Round | Surface | Winner | Score | Loser | Match |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Jan 4, 2001* | Adelaide | ATP 250 | R32 | Hard | Christophe Rochus | 1-6 7-6(2) 7-5 | Andrew Ilie | Match data |
| Aug 17, 2000* | Washington | ATP 250 | R32 | Hard | Christophe Rochus | 6-3 4-6 6-4 | Andrew Ilie | Match data |
* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.
Career Comparison
| Player | Current | Peak | Pts | Elo | W | L | Win % | GS | 1000 | Finals | 500 | 250 | Titles |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Christophe Rochus | #998 | #38 | 1,248 | 1,740 | 114 | 208 | 35.4% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Andrew Ilie | #856 | #38 | 997 | 1,739 | 89 | 114 | 43.8% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 2 | 2 |
Career Progression by Age
Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.
| Age | Christophe Rochus | Andrew Ilie | ||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | |
| 19 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1995 | 5–5 | 50.0% | #161 | 1,551 | 0 | 0 |
| 20 | 1999 | 1–2 | 33.3% | #121 | 1,502 | 0 | 0 | 1996 | 1–3 | 25.0% | #346 | 1,541 | 0 | 0 |
| 21 | 2000 | 14–22 | 38.9% | #74 | 1,555 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 22 | 2001 | 14–21 | 40.0% | #69 | 1,617 | 0 | 0 | 1998 | 14–14 | 50.0% | #59 | 1,586 | 0 | 1 |
| 23 | 2002 | 10–21 | 32.3% | #143 | 1,516 | 0 | 0 | 1999 | 28–29 | 49.1% | #54 | 1,632 | 0 | 1 |
| 24 | 2003 | 12–18 | 40.0% | #84 | 1,573 | 0 | 0 | 2000 | 21–26 | 44.7% | #50 | 1,602 | 0 | 2 |
| 25 | 2004 | 9–18 | 33.3% | #113 | 1,561 | 0 | 0 | 2001 | 20–28 | 41.7% | #66 | 1,622 | 0 | 2 |
| 26 | 2005 | 18–26 | 40.9% | #41 | 1,554 | 0 | 0 | 2002 | 0–7 | 0.0% | #464 | 1,502 | 0 | 2 |
| 27 | 2006 | 15–26 | 36.6% | #78 | 1,538 | 0 | 0 | 2003 | 0–2 | 0.0% | #384 | 1,457 | 0 | 2 |
| 28 | 2007 | 2–9 | 18.2% | #194 | 1,609 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 29 | 2008 | 5–7 | 41.7% | #69 | 1,689 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 30 | 2009 | 14–28 | 33.3% | #86 | 1,610 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 31 | 2010 | 0–10 | 0.0% | #249 | 1,551 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |