H2H data updated: 2026-07-19 01:16 UTC
Christophe Rochus vs Jean-Rene Lisnard H2H: 1-1
Christophe Rochus and Jean-Rene Lisnard are tied 1–1 in their ATP head-to-head. Across 2 main-draw meetings, Jean-Rene Lisnard leads 1–0 on clay, while Christophe Rochus leads 1–0 on hard courts. Most recently, Jean-Rene Lisnard won the 2009 Monte Carlo Masters second round 6-2 6-2.
Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.
BEL
Age 47
Right-Handed
170 cm / 5'7"
H2H
1
–
1
2 main draw meetings
MON
Age 46
Right-Handed
173 cm / 5'8"
H2H Match Log
| Date | Tournament | Category | Round | Surface | Winner | Score | Loser | Match |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Apr 14, 2009* | Monte Carlo Masters | Masters 1000 | R64 | Clay | Jean-Rene Lisnard | 6-2 6-2 | Christophe Rochus | Match data |
| Feb 23, 2006* | Rotterdam | ATP 250 | R32 | Hard | Christophe Rochus | 3-6 7-6(3) 6-4 | Jean-Rene Lisnard | Match data |
* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.
Career Comparison
| Player | Current | Peak | Pts | Elo | W | L | Win % | GS | 1000 | Finals | 500 | 250 | Titles |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Christophe Rochus | #998 | #38 | 1,248 | 1,740 | 114 | 208 | 35.4% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Jean-Rene Lisnard | #1,437 | #84 | 478 | 1,693 | 41 | 79 | 34.2% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
Career Progression by Age
Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.
| Age | Christophe Rochus | Jean-Rene Lisnard | ||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | |
| 19 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1999 | 1–2 | 33.3% | #138 | 1,498 | 0 | 0 |
| 20 | 1999 | 1–2 | 33.3% | #121 | 1,502 | 0 | 0 | 2000 | 1–6 | 14.3% | #194 | 1,465 | 0 | 0 |
| 21 | 2000 | 14–22 | 38.9% | #74 | 1,555 | 0 | 0 | 2001 | 2–3 | 40.0% | #264 | 1,542 | 0 | 0 |
| 22 | 2001 | 14–21 | 40.0% | #69 | 1,617 | 0 | 0 | 2002 | 5–5 | 50.0% | #105 | 1,634 | 0 | 0 |
| 23 | 2002 | 10–21 | 32.3% | #143 | 1,516 | 0 | 0 | 2003 | 16–19 | 45.7% | #97 | 1,645 | 0 | 0 |
| 24 | 2003 | 12–18 | 40.0% | #84 | 1,573 | 0 | 0 | 2004 | 4–13 | 23.5% | #132 | 1,532 | 0 | 0 |
| 25 | 2004 | 9–18 | 33.3% | #113 | 1,561 | 0 | 0 | 2005 | 9–19 | 32.1% | #103 | 1,563 | 0 | 0 |
| 26 | 2005 | 18–26 | 40.9% | #41 | 1,554 | 0 | 0 | 2006 | 1–5 | 16.7% | #295 | 1,497 | 0 | 0 |
| 27 | 2006 | 15–26 | 36.6% | #78 | 1,538 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 28 | 2007 | 2–9 | 18.2% | #194 | 1,609 | 0 | 0 | 2008 | 0–2 | 0.0% | #218 | 1,479 | 0 | 0 |
| 29 | 2008 | 5–7 | 41.7% | #69 | 1,689 | 0 | 0 | 2009 | 1–2 | 33.3% | #200 | 1,564 | 0 | 0 |
| 30 | 2009 | 14–28 | 33.3% | #86 | 1,610 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 31 | 2010 | 0–10 | 0.0% | #249 | 1,551 | 0 | 0 | 2011 | 1–2 | 33.3% | #353 | 1,606 | 0 | 0 |
| 32 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2012 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #1437 | 1,588 | 0 | 0 |