H2H data updated: 2026-09-05 00:00 UTC

Christophe Rochus vs Justin Gimelstob H2H: 1-3

Justin Gimelstob holds a 3–1 lead over Christophe Rochus in their ATP head-to-head. Across 4 main-draw meetings, Justin Gimelstob leads 2–1 on hard courts and 1–0 on grass. Most recently, Justin Gimelstob won the 2006 Wimbledon round of 128 6-3 6-4 6-4.

Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.

Christophe Rochus
BEL Age 47 Right-Handed 170 cm / 5'7"
H2H
1 – 3
4 main draw meetings
Justin Gimelstob
USA Age 49 Right-Handed 196 cm / 6'5"

H2H Match Log

PlayerScorePlayerMatch DataDateRoundTournamentCategorySurface
Justin Gimelstob #95 6-3 6-4 6-4 Christophe Rochus #70 Match data Jun 28, 2006* R128 Wimbledon Grand Slam Grass
Justin Gimelstob #222 6-6(2) (ret.) Christophe Rochus #118 Match data Oct 6, 2004* R64 Japan Open International Series Gold → modern equivalent ATP 500 Hard
Christophe Rochus #73 4-6 3-6 6-4 6-0 9-7 Justin Gimelstob #98 Match data Jan 17, 2001* R128 Australian Open Grand Slam Hard
Justin Gimelstob #88 3-6 6-3 6-4 7-6(4) Christophe Rochus #80 Match data Aug 30, 2000* R128 US Open Grand Slam Hard

Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable. Arrows show an edition's recorded category and documented modern equivalent; unresolved editions keep their recorded category. Asterisked totals include editions mapped from documented historical predecessor categories. Mapping details.

Career Comparison

Player Current Peak Pts Elo W L Win % GS 1000 including documented historical predecessor categories Finals 500 including documented historical predecessor categories 250 including documented historical predecessor categories Titles
Christophe Rochus #998 #38 1,248 1,737 114 208 35.4% 0 0 0 0 0 0
Justin Gimelstob #841 #63 733 1,722 107 171 38.5% 0 0 0 0 0 0

Career Progression by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.

Age Christophe Rochus Justin Gimelstob
YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles
18 — — — — — — — 1995 1–1 50.0% — 1,529 0 0
19 — — — — — — — 1996 3–9 25.0% #152 1,510 0 0
20 1999 1–2 33.3% #121 1,502 0 0 1997 17–23 42.5% #104 1,630 0 0
21 2000 14–22 38.9% #74 1,557 0 0 1998 14–15 48.3% #80 1,661 0 0
22 2001 14–21 40.0% #69 1,617 0 0 1999 17–26 39.5% #82 1,645 0 0
23 2002 10–21 32.3% #143 1,516 0 0 2000 14–16 46.7% #97 1,675 0 0
24 2003 12–18 40.0% #84 1,573 0 0 2001 3–12 20.0% #177 1,595 0 0
25 2004 9–18 33.3% #113 1,564 0 0 2002 5–6 45.5% #106 1,619 0 0
26 2005 18–26 40.9% #41 1,553 0 0 2003 9–17 34.6% #106 1,532 0 0
27 2006 15–26 36.6% #78 1,538 0 0 2004 1–5 16.7% #162 1,507 0 0
28 2007 2–9 18.2% #194 1,599 0 0 2005 8–9 47.1% #104 1,595 0 0
29 2008 5–7 41.7% #69 1,685 0 0 2006 14–20 41.2% #86 1,606 0 0
30 2009 14–28 33.3% #86 1,610 0 0 2007 1–12 7.7% #556 1,537 0 0
31 2010 0–10 0.0% #249 1,550 0 0 — — — — — — —

Surface Results by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. Results cover completed main-draw matches. Bold green marks the higher win percentage when both players have at least 5 matches on that surface at the aligned age.

Age Christophe Rochus Justin Gimelstob
Yr HardClayGrassCarpet Yr HardClayGrassCarpet
W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win %
18 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 1995 1 1 2 50.0% — — — — — — — — — — — —
19 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 1996 3 7 10 30.0% — — — — 0 2 2 0.0% — — — —
20 1999 — — — — 1 2 3 33.3% — — — — — — — — 1997 15 16 31 48.4% — — — — 1 4 5 20.0% 1 3 4 25.0%
21 2000 6 9 15 40.0% 7 9 16 43.8% 1 3 4 25.0% 0 1 1 0.0% 1998 5 7 12 41.7% 4 2 6 66.7% 3 4 7 42.9% 2 2 4 50.0%
22 2001 5 6 11 45.5% 7 12 19 36.8% 0 2 2 0.0% 2 1 3 66.7% 1999 13 16 29 44.8% 2 5 7 28.6% 1 4 5 20.0% 1 1 2 50.0%
23 2002 3 8 11 27.3% 6 9 15 40.0% 1 3 4 25.0% 0 1 1 0.0% 2000 10 9 19 52.6% 0 3 3 0.0% 4 4 8 50.0% — — — —
24 2003 2 7 9 22.2% 9 9 18 50.0% 1 2 3 33.3% — — — — 2001 2 10 12 16.7% — — — — 1 2 3 33.3% — — — —
25 2004 0 7 7 0.0% 8 8 16 50.0% 0 2 2 0.0% 1 1 2 50.0% 2002 3 5 8 37.5% — — — — 2 1 3 66.7% — — — —
26 2005 7 10 17 41.2% 11 10 21 52.4% 0 3 3 0.0% 0 3 3 0.0% 2003 5 11 16 31.3% 0 2 2 0.0% 4 4 8 50.0% — — — —
27 2006 8 11 19 42.1% 6 11 17 35.3% 0 2 2 0.0% 1 2 3 33.3% 2004 1 4 5 20.0% — — — — 0 1 1 0.0% — — — —
28 2007 1 5 6 16.7% 1 3 4 25.0% — — — — 0 1 1 0.0% 2005 6 8 14 42.9% — — — — 2 1 3 66.7% — — — —
29 2008 1 2 3 33.3% 3 3 6 50.0% 0 1 1 0.0% 1 1 2 50.0% 2006 6 13 19 31.6% 2 3 5 40.0% 6 4 10 60.0% — — — —
30 2009 8 15 23 34.8% 6 10 16 37.5% 0 3 3 0.0% — — — — 2007 1 5 6 16.7% 0 2 2 0.0% 0 4 4 0.0% 0 1 1 0.0%
31 2010 0 6 6 0.0% 0 3 3 0.0% 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Career — 41 86 127 32.3% 65 89 154 42.2% 3 22 25 12.0% 5 11 16 31.2% — 71 112 183 38.8% 8 17 25 32.0% 24 35 59 40.7% 4 7 11 36.4%

Performance Progression by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. Detailed serve and return statistics available for 310/322 of Christophe Rochus's and 259/278 of Justin Gimelstob's main draw matches. Sample is shown as matches with detailed serve and return statistics / total main draw matches. Bold green marks the stronger value when both stat samples contain at least 5 matches; lower is better for DFs/M.

Age Christophe Rochus Justin Gimelstob
Yr Sample Aces/M DFs/M 1st Sv% 1st Pts% 2nd Pts% BP Saved% BP Conv% Svc Pts% Ret Pts% Yr Sample Aces/M DFs/M 1st Sv% 1st Pts% 2nd Pts% BP Saved% BP Conv% Svc Pts% Ret Pts%
18 — —/— — — — — — — — — — 1995 2/2 8.0 5.0 62.7% 69.5% 44.6% 68.1% 31.7% 59.4% 30.5%
19 — —/— — — — — — — — — — 1996 10/12 5.1 3.4 54.9% 73.3% 46.5% 41.8% 50.8% 61.4% 35.3%
20 1999 2/3 2.5 0.0 73.7% 63.5% 48.3% 25.0% 29.2% 59.8% 44.3% 1997 36/40 6.0 5.8 58.7% 71.8% 44.8% 51.3% 37.8% 60.5% 35.9%
21 2000 31/36 2.1 4.6 57.6% 63.0% 47.3% 57.1% 42.6% 56.2% 36.6% 1998 26/29 5.5 3.9 59.7% 72.6% 47.9% 55.6% 44.3% 62.5% 39.5%
22 2001 34/35 1.9 3.7 58.1% 63.0% 46.6% 52.9% 40.5% 55.8% 40.1% 1999 37/43 6.9 3.9 60.4% 72.2% 47.6% 56.4% 39.5% 62.4% 35.7%
23 2002 29/31 2.0 3.9 57.0% 62.8% 44.8% 49.9% 48.4% 54.7% 37.4% 2000 29/30 8.3 4.4 58.7% 73.7% 49.6% 57.8% 36.8% 63.2% 37.6%
24 2003 28/30 1.1 2.6 65.2% 61.8% 50.7% 56.5% 35.9% 58.0% 38.7% 2001 13/15 5.6 5.7 55.5% 71.2% 45.9% 45.8% 36.3% 59.8% 34.1%
25 2004 27/27 1.7 2.1 62.3% 61.8% 47.7% 53.5% 41.5% 56.3% 39.7% 2002 10/11 5.5 5.7 53.9% 69.8% 43.4% 49.0% 29.6% 57.9% 37.0%
26 2005 44/44 1.9 2.7 59.4% 64.0% 47.9% 48.5% 47.8% 57.6% 39.4% 2003 26/26 7.3 4.2 54.5% 73.8% 45.2% 63.5% 42.7% 60.7% 36.5%
27 2006 41/41 1.5 2.7 64.0% 62.3% 42.1% 44.2% 45.9% 55.0% 35.9% 2004 6/6 4.5 5.5 48.7% 73.2% 49.4% 40.7% 26.3% 60.7% 35.9%
28 2007 11/11 1.6 1.6 65.1% 60.4% 46.2% 53.7% 23.7% 55.6% 30.9% 2005 17/17 11.4 4.9 56.8% 77.1% 52.2% 59.4% 40.1% 66.2% 35.8%
29 2008 12/12 2.3 1.2 64.3% 66.4% 49.9% 55.7% 32.9% 60.1% 37.4% 2006 34/34 7.0 2.9 56.6% 72.4% 47.8% 63.7% 36.2% 61.7% 34.9%
30 2009 41/42 2.0 2.5 59.4% 64.4% 45.2% 47.5% 42.7% 56.6% 36.3% 2007 13/13 4.3 4.8 57.1% 65.3% 43.1% 49.5% 26.4% 55.8% 29.5%
31 2010 10/10 2.5 2.8 63.2% 63.7% 45.6% 56.1% 24.1% 57.2% 32.2% — —/— — — — — — — — — —
Career — 310/322 1.8 2.9 60.8% 63.1% 46.5% 51.0% 41.7% 56.5% 37.5% — 259/278 6.8 4.4 57.4% 72.4% 47.1% 55.6% 38.2% 61.5% 35.9%

Advanced Statistics Comparison by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. Metrics are precomputed from eligible main-draw results; point-stat values use the available detailed sample. Bold green marks the stronger value when both underlying samples are sufficient. Lower is better for Schedule because a negative value means a tougher schedule. Career Schedule is normalized per 100 matches.

Age Christophe Rochus Justin Gimelstob
Yr Elo P+ Serve+ Return+ PD TPW% Hard Elo Clay Elo Grass Elo Set Win % Set Margin Dec. Set Tiebreak Pressure+ Schedule Yr Elo P+ Serve+ Return+ PD TPW% Hard Elo Clay Elo Grass Elo Set Win % Set Margin Dec. Set Tiebreak Pressure+ Schedule
18 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 1995 1530 110.0 -1.36 +1.92 0.750 45.8% — — — 37.5% -0.63 1–0 — — -0.13
19 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 1996 1510 118.9 +0.13 +0.36 0.915 48.2% +28 — — 29.6% -0.93 1–2 (33%) 1–4 (20%) 97.5 -0.63
20 1999 1503 104.4 -2.18 +1.00 1.100 51.0% — +18 — 37.5% -1.00 — 1–0 — -0.18 1997 1630 134.5 -1.35 -0.78 0.909 48.5% +30 — -55 43.3% -0.47 7–6 (54%) 10–8 (56%) 103.8 +0.60
21 2000 1557 115.9 -4.02 -1.23 0.835 46.8% +4 +8 -12 40.0% -0.66 6–5 (55%) 3–4 (43%) 101.4 +0.64 1998 1661 129.0 +0.39 +1.22 1.052 50.8% -10 -75 -71 50.7% +0.12 6–8 (43%) 4–9 (31%) 96.0 -0.12
22 2001 1618 126.4 -4.35 +1.62 0.907 48.1% +35 -56 — 41.6% -0.63 4–6 (40%) 4–3 (57%) 102.1 +0.14 1999 1645 137.7 -0.21 -1.19 0.949 49.1% +36 -75 -122 45.0% -0.28 3–10 (23%) 7–12 (37%) 91.8 -1.22
23 2002 1516 110.1 -5.22 -0.77 0.827 46.3% +33 +48 -53 31.1% -1.39 5–4 (56%) 3–6 (33%) 100.0 +1.20 2000 1675 126.8 +0.05 +0.25 1.022 50.4% +34 -174 -115 47.5% -0.40 5–7 (42%) 10–6 (63%) 99.6 +0.17
24 2003 1574 124.8 -2.99 +0.52 0.920 48.6% -35 +71 -141 40.8% -0.56 2–1 (67%) 2–1 (67%) 103.1 +0.03 2001 1596 108.5 -1.35 -2.71 0.849 47.0% +17 — -76 29.3% -1.39 2–4 (33%) 3–4 (43%) 96.1 +0.32
25 2004 1564 126.9 -4.36 +1.63 0.909 48.2% -88 +118 — 40.3% -0.68 0–7 (0%) 0–3 (0%) 88.5 +0.30 2002 1620 119.3 -1.95 +1.16 0.880 46.9% +9 — -59 40.7% -0.81 2–0 1–2 (33%) — -0.03
26 2005 1553 123.5 -4.08 +1.28 0.929 48.7% -47 +98 -60 42.9% -0.50 6–6 (50%) 2–8 (20%) 98.1 +2.63 2003 1532 117.2 -2.07 -0.87 0.929 48.9% +13 — +76 40.0% -0.51 3–5 (38%) 3–7 (30%) 95.7 +1.70
27 2006 1539 118.1 -5.48 -0.54 0.798 45.5% +24 +46 — 35.1% -1.26 7–4 (64%) 3–1 (75%) 107.7 +0.19 2004 1507 110.1 -0.55 -0.52 0.913 47.3% +4 — — 23.1% -1.69 0–3 (0%) — — -0.42
28 2007 1600 119.0 -2.93 -2.44 0.696 44.1% -73 +61 — 26.3% -2.10 0–1 2–1 (67%) — -0.91 2005 1596 127.5 +2.04 +0.31 1.059 51.1% -56 — +71 48.9% +0.08 2–5 (29%) 6–7 (46%) 99.7 -0.05
29 2008 1685 125.0 -1.89 +1.26 0.937 48.5% -62 +4 — 50.0% -0.08 1–1 1–0 — -0.65 2006 1606 122.4 -0.69 -1.72 0.913 49.0% -77 -132 +106 44.9% -0.32 3–5 (38%) 6–7 (46%) 100.7 +0.54
30 2009 1610 128.7 -5.45 -0.29 0.836 46.8% +8 +22 -119 38.8% -0.98 3–10 (23%) 3–3 (50%) 92.7 +0.28 2007 1537 116.4 -4.94 -3.75 0.668 43.5% -37 — +128 10.0% -2.37 0–1 0–2 — -0.45
31 2010 1551 114.0 -3.32 -1.02 0.754 45.0% -38 +110 — 20.8% -2.08 0–4 (0%) 1–2 (33%) 93.6 -0.09 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Career — 1738 126.3 -4.34 +0.18 0.862 47.2% -10 +44 -72 38.4% -0.88 34–49 (41%) 25–32 (44%) 96.4 +1.11 — 1722 132.5 -0.75 -0.68 0.933 48.8% +5 -103 -6 41.7% -0.51 35–56 (38%) 51–68 (43%) 92.8 +0.10

Career Rivalries

Each player's five most-played main-draw opponents. The current matchup is highlighted when it appears in a player's top five.