H2H data updated: 2026-07-19 01:16 UTC
Christophe Rochus vs Kristian Pless H2H: 1-1
Christophe Rochus and Kristian Pless are tied 1–1 in their ATP head-to-head. Across 2 main-draw meetings, Christophe Rochus leads 1–0 on clay, while Kristian Pless leads 1–0 on hard courts. Most recently, Kristian Pless won the 2004 Shanghai third round 4-6 7-5 6-0.
Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.
BEL
Age 47
Right-Handed
170 cm / 5'7"
H2H
1
–
1
2 main draw meetings
DEN
Age 45
Right-Handed
188 cm / 6'2"
H2H Match Log
| Date | Tournament | Category | Round | Surface | Winner | Score | Loser | Match |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Sep 30, 2004* | Shanghai | ATP 250 | R32 | Hard | Kristian Pless | 4-6 7-5 6-0 | Christophe Rochus | Match data |
| May 2, 2002* | Mallorca | ATP 250 | R32 | Clay | Christophe Rochus | 7-6(7) 2-6 6-2 | Kristian Pless | Match data |
* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.
Career Comparison
| Player | Current | Peak | Pts | Elo | W | L | Win % | GS | 1000 | Finals | 500 | 250 | Titles |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Christophe Rochus | #998 | #38 | 1,248 | 1,740 | 114 | 208 | 35.4% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Kristian Pless | #939 | #65 | 592 | 1,709 | 43 | 81 | 34.7% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
Career Progression by Age
Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.
| Age | Christophe Rochus | Kristian Pless | ||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | |
| 18 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1999 | 1–2 | 33.3% | #458 | 1,511 | 0 | 0 |
| 19 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2000 | 0–3 | 0.0% | #197 | 1,492 | 0 | 0 |
| 20 | 1999 | 1–2 | 33.3% | #121 | 1,502 | 0 | 0 | 2001 | 12–10 | 54.5% | #68 | 1,658 | 0 | 0 |
| 21 | 2000 | 14–22 | 38.9% | #74 | 1,555 | 0 | 0 | 2002 | 15–22 | 40.5% | #82 | 1,663 | 0 | 0 |
| 22 | 2001 | 14–21 | 40.0% | #69 | 1,617 | 0 | 0 | 2003 | 2–5 | 28.6% | #440 | 1,610 | 0 | 0 |
| 23 | 2002 | 10–21 | 32.3% | #143 | 1,516 | 0 | 0 | 2004 | 3–9 | 25.0% | #230 | 1,554 | 0 | 0 |
| 24 | 2003 | 12–18 | 40.0% | #84 | 1,573 | 0 | 0 | 2005 | 0–2 | 0.0% | #160 | 1,543 | 0 | 0 |
| 25 | 2004 | 9–18 | 33.3% | #113 | 1,561 | 0 | 0 | 2006 | 5–10 | 33.3% | #84 | 1,626 | 0 | 0 |
| 26 | 2005 | 18–26 | 40.9% | #41 | 1,554 | 0 | 0 | 2007 | 5–16 | 23.8% | #128 | 1,508 | 0 | 0 |
| 27 | 2006 | 15–26 | 36.6% | #78 | 1,538 | 0 | 0 | 2008 | 0–2 | 0.0% | #158 | 1,480 | 0 | 0 |
| 28 | 2007 | 2–9 | 18.2% | #194 | 1,609 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 29 | 2008 | 5–7 | 41.7% | #69 | 1,689 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 30 | 2009 | 14–28 | 33.3% | #86 | 1,610 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 31 | 2010 | 0–10 | 0.0% | #249 | 1,551 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |