H2H data updated: 2026-07-18 13:16 UTC
Christophe Rochus vs Max Mirnyi H2H: 2-0
Christophe Rochus holds a 2–0 lead over Max Mirnyi in their ATP head-to-head. Across 2 main-draw meetings, Christophe Rochus leads 2–0 on hard courts. Most recently, Christophe Rochus won the 2001 Sydney third round 6-3 6-1.
Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.
BEL
Age 47
Right-Handed
170 cm / 5'7"
H2H
2
–
0
2 main draw meetings
BLR
Age 49
Right-Handed
196 cm / 6'5"
H2H Match Log
| Date | Tournament | Category | Round | Surface | Winner | Score | Loser | Match |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Jan 11, 2001* | Sydney | ATP 250 | R32 | Hard | Christophe Rochus | 6-3 6-1 | Max Mirnyi | Match data |
| Jan 23, 2000* | Australian Open | Grand Slam | R32 | Hard | Christophe Rochus | 3-6 6-4 6-3 7-6(2) | Max Mirnyi | Match data |
* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.
Career Comparison
| Player | Current | Peak | Pts | Elo | W | L | Win % | GS | 1000 | Finals | 500 | 250 | Titles |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Christophe Rochus | #998 | #38 | 1,248 | 1,740 | 114 | 208 | 35.4% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Max Mirnyi | #1,155 | #18 | 1,320 | 1,913 | 216 | 222 | 49.3% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 1 |
Career Progression by Age
Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.
| Age | Christophe Rochus | Max Mirnyi | ||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | |
| 18 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1996 | 0–2 | 0.0% | #314 | 1,481 | 0 | 0 |
| 19 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1997 | 0–3 | 0.0% | #340 | 1,443 | 0 | 0 |
| 20 | 1999 | 1–2 | 33.3% | #121 | 1,502 | 0 | 0 | 1998 | 1–2 | 33.3% | #274 | 1,443 | 0 | 0 |
| 21 | 2000 | 14–22 | 38.9% | #74 | 1,555 | 0 | 0 | 1999 | 14–13 | 51.9% | #74 | 1,613 | 0 | 0 |
| 22 | 2001 | 14–21 | 40.0% | #69 | 1,617 | 0 | 0 | 2000 | 27–25 | 51.9% | #40 | 1,716 | 0 | 0 |
| 23 | 2002 | 10–21 | 32.3% | #143 | 1,516 | 0 | 0 | 2001 | 29–26 | 52.7% | #35 | 1,865 | 0 | 0 |
| 24 | 2003 | 12–18 | 40.0% | #84 | 1,573 | 0 | 0 | 2002 | 24–27 | 47.1% | #43 | 1,717 | 0 | 0 |
| 25 | 2004 | 9–18 | 33.3% | #113 | 1,561 | 0 | 0 | 2003 | 37–28 | 56.9% | #23 | 1,785 | 0 | 1 |
| 26 | 2005 | 18–26 | 40.9% | #41 | 1,554 | 0 | 0 | 2004 | 20–25 | 44.4% | #47 | 1,719 | 0 | 1 |
| 27 | 2006 | 15–26 | 36.6% | #78 | 1,538 | 0 | 0 | 2005 | 32–24 | 57.1% | #34 | 1,735 | 0 | 1 |
| 28 | 2007 | 2–9 | 18.2% | #194 | 1,609 | 0 | 0 | 2006 | 21–24 | 46.7% | #59 | 1,723 | 0 | 1 |
| 29 | 2008 | 5–7 | 41.7% | #69 | 1,689 | 0 | 0 | 2007 | 9–18 | 33.3% | #152 | 1,593 | 0 | 1 |
| 30 | 2009 | 14–28 | 33.3% | #86 | 1,610 | 0 | 0 | 2008 | 2–5 | 28.6% | #523 | 1,563 | 0 | 1 |
| 31 | 2010 | 0–10 | 0.0% | #249 | 1,551 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |