H2H data updated: 2026-07-18 14:16 UTC
Christophe Rochus vs Peter Wessels H2H: 0-1
Peter Wessels holds a 1–0 lead over Christophe Rochus in their ATP head-to-head. Across 1 main-draw meeting, Peter Wessels leads 1–0 on hard courts. Most recently, Peter Wessels won the 2005 US Open first round 6-7(4) 6-3 6-4 6-4.
Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.
BEL
Age 47
Right-Handed
170 cm / 5'7"
H2H
0
–
1
1 main draw meetings
NED
Age 48
Right-Handed
196 cm / 6'5"
H2H Match Log
| Date | Tournament | Category | Round | Surface | Winner | Score | Loser | Match |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Aug 31, 2005* | US Open | Grand Slam | R128 | Hard | Peter Wessels | 6-7(4) 6-3 6-4 6-4 | Christophe Rochus | Match data |
* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.
Career Comparison
| Player | Current | Peak | Pts | Elo | W | L | Win % | GS | 1000 | Finals | 500 | 250 | Titles |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Christophe Rochus | #998 | #38 | 1,248 | 1,740 | 114 | 208 | 35.4% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Peter Wessels | #987 | #72 | 586 | 1,715 | 43 | 58 | 42.6% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 1 |
Career Progression by Age
Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.
| Age | Christophe Rochus | Peter Wessels | ||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | |
| 18 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1996 | 0–3 | 0.0% | #369 | 1,475 | 0 | 0 |
| 19 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1997 | 0–2 | 0.0% | #321 | 1,467 | 0 | 0 |
| 20 | 1999 | 1–2 | 33.3% | #121 | 1,502 | 0 | 0 | 1998 | 1–2 | 33.3% | #112 | 1,479 | 0 | 0 |
| 21 | 2000 | 14–22 | 38.9% | #74 | 1,555 | 0 | 0 | 1999 | 12–15 | 44.4% | #108 | 1,591 | 0 | 0 |
| 22 | 2001 | 14–21 | 40.0% | #69 | 1,617 | 0 | 0 | 2000 | 7–5 | 58.3% | #150 | 1,641 | 0 | 1 |
| 23 | 2002 | 10–21 | 32.3% | #143 | 1,516 | 0 | 0 | 2001 | 11–11 | 50.0% | #110 | 1,605 | 0 | 1 |
| 24 | 2003 | 12–18 | 40.0% | #84 | 1,573 | 0 | 0 | 2002 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #465 | 1,565 | 0 | 1 |
| 25 | 2004 | 9–18 | 33.3% | #113 | 1,561 | 0 | 0 | 2003 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #203 | 1,558 | 0 | 1 |
| 26 | 2005 | 18–26 | 40.9% | #41 | 1,554 | 0 | 0 | 2004 | 0–2 | 0.0% | #89 | 1,528 | 0 | 1 |
| 27 | 2006 | 15–26 | 36.6% | #78 | 1,538 | 0 | 0 | 2005 | 8–13 | 38.1% | #144 | 1,564 | 0 | 1 |
| 28 | 2007 | 2–9 | 18.2% | #194 | 1,609 | 0 | 0 | 2006 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #401 | 1,528 | 0 | 1 |
| 29 | 2008 | 5–7 | 41.7% | #69 | 1,689 | 0 | 0 | 2007 | 4–2 | 66.7% | #163 | 1,613 | 0 | 1 |
| 30 | 2009 | 14–28 | 33.3% | #86 | 1,610 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 31 | 2010 | 0–10 | 0.0% | #249 | 1,551 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |