H2H data updated: 2026-07-20 19:16 UTC
Christophe Rochus vs Raemon Sluiter H2H: 1-0
Christophe Rochus holds a 1–0 lead over Raemon Sluiter in their ATP head-to-head. Across 1 main-draw meeting, Christophe Rochus leads 1–0 on hard courts. Most recently, Christophe Rochus won the 2002 Australian Open first round 4-6 6-3 6-4 6-2.
Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.
BEL
Age 47
Right-Handed
170 cm / 5'7"
H2H
1
–
0
1 main draw meetings
NED
Age 48
Right-Handed
185 cm / 6'1"
H2H Match Log
| Date | Tournament | Category | Round | Surface | Winner | Score | Loser | Match |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Jan 16, 2002* | Australian Open | Grand Slam | R128 | Hard | Christophe Rochus | 4-6 6-3 6-4 6-2 | Raemon Sluiter | Match data |
* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.
Career Comparison
| Player | Current | Peak | Pts | Elo | W | L | Win % | GS | 1000 | Finals | 500 | 250 | Titles |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Christophe Rochus | #998 | #38 | 1,248 | 1,740 | 114 | 208 | 35.4% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Raemon Sluiter | #1,007 | #46 | 742 | 1,749 | 84 | 121 | 41.0% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
Career Progression by Age
Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.
| Age | Christophe Rochus | Raemon Sluiter | ||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | |
| 18 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1996 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #716 | 1,492 | 0 | 0 |
| 20 | 1999 | 1–2 | 33.3% | #121 | 1,502 | 0 | 0 | 1998 | 1–4 | 20.0% | #241 | 1,484 | 0 | 0 |
| 21 | 2000 | 14–22 | 38.9% | #74 | 1,555 | 0 | 0 | 1999 | 0–2 | 0.0% | #162 | 1,474 | 0 | 0 |
| 22 | 2001 | 14–21 | 40.0% | #69 | 1,617 | 0 | 0 | 2000 | 8–7 | 53.3% | #95 | 1,623 | 0 | 0 |
| 23 | 2002 | 10–21 | 32.3% | #143 | 1,516 | 0 | 0 | 2001 | 7–12 | 36.8% | #131 | 1,617 | 0 | 0 |
| 24 | 2003 | 12–18 | 40.0% | #84 | 1,573 | 0 | 0 | 2002 | 10–14 | 41.7% | #71 | 1,660 | 0 | 0 |
| 25 | 2004 | 9–18 | 33.3% | #113 | 1,561 | 0 | 0 | 2003 | 19–24 | 44.2% | #59 | 1,630 | 0 | 0 |
| 26 | 2005 | 18–26 | 40.9% | #41 | 1,554 | 0 | 0 | 2004 | 19–22 | 46.3% | #82 | 1,624 | 0 | 0 |
| 27 | 2006 | 15–26 | 36.6% | #78 | 1,538 | 0 | 0 | 2005 | 5–14 | 26.3% | #106 | 1,540 | 0 | 0 |
| 28 | 2007 | 2–9 | 18.2% | #194 | 1,609 | 0 | 0 | 2006 | 8–15 | 34.8% | #119 | 1,574 | 0 | 0 |
| 29 | 2008 | 5–7 | 41.7% | #69 | 1,689 | 0 | 0 | 2007 | 3–4 | 42.9% | #169 | 1,597 | 0 | 0 |
| 30 | 2009 | 14–28 | 33.3% | #86 | 1,610 | 0 | 0 | 2008 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #1040 | 1,587 | 0 | 0 |
| 31 | 2010 | 0–10 | 0.0% | #249 | 1,551 | 0 | 0 | 2009 | 4–1 | 80.0% | #197 | 1,650 | 0 | 0 |