H2H data updated: 2026-07-18 02:15 UTC
Christophe Rochus vs Thomas Johansson H2H: 1-2
Thomas Johansson holds a 2–1 lead over Christophe Rochus in their ATP head-to-head. Across 3 main-draw meetings, Christophe Rochus leads 1–0 on clay, while Thomas Johansson leads 1–0 on grass. Most recently, Christophe Rochus won the 2006 Roland Garros first round 3-6 5-7 6-4 6-4 6-2.
Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.
BEL
Age 47
Right-Handed
170 cm / 5'7"
H2H
1
–
2
3 main draw meetings
SWE
Age 51
Right-Handed
180 cm / 5'11"
H2H Match Log
| Date | Tournament | Category | Round | Surface | Winner | Score | Loser | Match |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| May 31, 2006* | Roland Garros | Grand Slam | R128 | Clay | Christophe Rochus | 3-6 5-7 6-4 6-4 6-2 | Thomas Johansson | Match data |
| Jan 8, 2004* | Adelaide | ATP 250 | R32 | Hard | Thomas Johansson | 6-1 6-3 | Christophe Rochus | Match data |
| Jun 21, 2001* | Nottingham | ATP 250 | R32 | Grass | Thomas Johansson | 6-2 6-2 | Christophe Rochus | Match data |
* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.
Career Comparison
| Player | Current | Peak | Pts | Elo | W | L | Win % | GS | 1000 | Finals | 500 | 250 | Titles |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Christophe Rochus | #998 | #38 | 1,248 | 1,740 | 114 | 208 | 35.4% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Thomas Johansson | #586 | #7 | 2,365 | 1,969 | 336 | 277 | 54.8% | 1 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 7 | 9 |
Career Progression by Age
Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.
| Age | Christophe Rochus | Thomas Johansson | ||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | |
| 18 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1993 | 2–1 | 66.7% | #422 | 1,535 | 0 | 0 |
| 19 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1994 | 0–2 | 0.0% | #486 | 1,496 | 0 | 0 |
| 20 | 1999 | 1–2 | 33.3% | #121 | 1,502 | 0 | 0 | 1995 | 1–3 | 25.0% | #117 | 1,492 | 0 | 0 |
| 21 | 2000 | 14–22 | 38.9% | #74 | 1,555 | 0 | 0 | 1996 | 28–21 | 57.1% | #60 | 1,763 | 0 | 0 |
| 22 | 2001 | 14–21 | 40.0% | #69 | 1,617 | 0 | 0 | 1997 | 32–27 | 54.2% | #39 | 1,699 | 0 | 2 |
| 23 | 2002 | 10–21 | 32.3% | #143 | 1,516 | 0 | 0 | 1998 | 46–30 | 60.5% | #17 | 1,899 | 0 | 2 |
| 24 | 2003 | 12–18 | 40.0% | #84 | 1,573 | 0 | 0 | 1999 | 21–23 | 47.7% | #39 | 1,725 | 0 | 3 |
| 25 | 2004 | 9–18 | 33.3% | #113 | 1,561 | 0 | 0 | 2000 | 22–25 | 46.8% | #39 | 1,825 | 0 | 4 |
| 26 | 2005 | 18–26 | 40.9% | #41 | 1,554 | 0 | 0 | 2001 | 42–23 | 64.6% | #18 | 1,875 | 0 | 6 |
| 27 | 2006 | 15–26 | 36.6% | #78 | 1,538 | 0 | 0 | 2002 | 26–22 | 54.2% | #14 | 1,746 | 1 | 7 |
| 28 | 2007 | 2–9 | 18.2% | #194 | 1,609 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 29 | 2008 | 5–7 | 41.7% | #69 | 1,689 | 0 | 0 | 2004 | 29–20 | 59.2% | #30 | 1,855 | 1 | 8 |
| 30 | 2009 | 14–28 | 33.3% | #86 | 1,610 | 0 | 0 | 2005 | 42–24 | 63.6% | #13 | 1,892 | 1 | 9 |
| 31 | 2010 | 0–10 | 0.0% | #249 | 1,551 | 0 | 0 | 2006 | 11–16 | 40.7% | #71 | 1,723 | 1 | 9 |
| 32 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2007 | 23–23 | 50.0% | #62 | 1,759 | 1 | 9 |
| 33 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2008 | 11–17 | 39.3% | #136 | 1,673 | 1 | 9 |