H2H data updated: 2026-07-18 13:16 UTC
Christophe Rochus vs Tomas Zib H2H: 0-1
Tomas Zib holds a 1–0 lead over Christophe Rochus in their ATP head-to-head. Across 1 main-draw meeting, Tomas Zib leads 1–0 on clay. Most recently, Tomas Zib won the 2005 Casablanca quarterfinal 6-1 7-6(7).
Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.
BEL
Age 47
Right-Handed
170 cm / 5'7"
H2H
0
–
1
1 main draw meetings
CZE
Age 50
Right-Handed
178 cm / 5'10"
H2H Match Log
| Date | Tournament | Category | Round | Surface | Winner | Score | Loser | Match |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| May 29, 2007* | Roland Garros | Grand Slam | Q3 | Clay | Christophe Rochus | 2-6 6-4 8-6 | Tomas Zib | Match data |
| Apr 9, 2005* | Casablanca | ATP 250 | QF | Clay | Tomas Zib | 6-1 7-6(7) | Christophe Rochus | Match data |
| May 27, 2003* | Roland Garros | Grand Slam | Q3 | Clay | Christophe Rochus | 4-6 6-2 8-6 | Tomas Zib | Match data |
* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.
Career Comparison
| Player | Current | Peak | Pts | Elo | W | L | Win % | GS | 1000 | Finals | 500 | 250 | Titles |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Christophe Rochus | #998 | #38 | 1,248 | 1,740 | 114 | 208 | 35.4% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Tomas Zib | #1,339 | #51 | 688 | 1,636 | 41 | 94 | 30.4% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
Career Progression by Age
Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.
| Age | Christophe Rochus | Tomas Zib | ||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | |
| 20 | 1999 | 1–2 | 33.3% | #121 | 1,502 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 21 | 2000 | 14–22 | 38.9% | #74 | 1,555 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 22 | 2001 | 14–21 | 40.0% | #69 | 1,617 | 0 | 0 | 1998 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #172 | 1,487 | 0 | 0 |
| 23 | 2002 | 10–21 | 32.3% | #143 | 1,516 | 0 | 0 | 1999 | 4–4 | 50.0% | #111 | 1,531 | 0 | 0 |
| 24 | 2003 | 12–18 | 40.0% | #84 | 1,573 | 0 | 0 | 2000 | 5–13 | 27.8% | #117 | 1,465 | 0 | 0 |
| 25 | 2004 | 9–18 | 33.3% | #113 | 1,561 | 0 | 0 | 2001 | 3–11 | 21.4% | #224 | 1,438 | 0 | 0 |
| 26 | 2005 | 18–26 | 40.9% | #41 | 1,554 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 27 | 2006 | 15–26 | 36.6% | #78 | 1,538 | 0 | 0 | 2003 | 1–5 | 16.7% | #145 | 1,466 | 0 | 0 |
| 28 | 2007 | 2–9 | 18.2% | #194 | 1,609 | 0 | 0 | 2004 | 3–8 | 27.3% | #121 | 1,482 | 0 | 0 |
| 29 | 2008 | 5–7 | 41.7% | #69 | 1,689 | 0 | 0 | 2005 | 18–27 | 40.0% | #59 | 1,558 | 0 | 0 |
| 30 | 2009 | 14–28 | 33.3% | #86 | 1,610 | 0 | 0 | 2006 | 4–20 | 16.7% | #133 | 1,509 | 0 | 0 |
| 31 | 2010 | 0–10 | 0.0% | #249 | 1,551 | 0 | 0 | 2007 | 3–4 | 42.9% | #138 | 1,535 | 0 | 0 |
| 32 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2008 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #416 | 1,546 | 0 | 0 |