H2H data updated: 2026-07-18 07:16 UTC
Christophe Rochus vs Wayne Arthurs H2H: 0-1
Wayne Arthurs holds a 1–0 lead over Christophe Rochus in their ATP head-to-head. Across 1 main-draw meeting, Wayne Arthurs leads 1–0 on hard courts. Most recently, Wayne Arthurs won the 2005 Scottsdale semifinal 7-5 7-6(2).
Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.
BEL
Age 47
Right-Handed
170 cm / 5'7"
H2H
0
–
1
1 main draw meetings
AUS
Age 55
Left-Handed
190 cm / 6'3"
H2H Match Log
| Date | Tournament | Category | Round | Surface | Winner | Score | Loser | Match |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Jun 26, 2007* | Wimbledon | Grand Slam | Q3 | Grass | Wayne Arthurs | 6-3 3-6 6-7(5) 7-5 6-4 | Christophe Rochus | Match data |
| Feb 26, 2005* | Scottsdale | ATP 250 | SF | Hard | Wayne Arthurs | 7-5 7-6(2) | Christophe Rochus | Match data |
* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.
Career Comparison
| Player | Current | Peak | Pts | Elo | W | L | Win % | GS | 1000 | Finals | 500 | 250 | Titles |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Christophe Rochus | #998 | #38 | 1,248 | 1,740 | 114 | 208 | 35.4% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Wayne Arthurs | #368 | #44 | 833 | 1,781 | 122 | 152 | 44.5% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 1 |
Career Progression by Age
Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.
| Age | Christophe Rochus | Wayne Arthurs | ||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | |
| 20 | 1999 | 1–2 | 33.3% | #121 | 1,502 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 21 | 2000 | 14–22 | 38.9% | #74 | 1,555 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 22 | 2001 | 14–21 | 40.0% | #69 | 1,617 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 23 | 2002 | 10–21 | 32.3% | #143 | 1,516 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 24 | 2003 | 12–18 | 40.0% | #84 | 1,573 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 25 | 2004 | 9–18 | 33.3% | #113 | 1,561 | 0 | 0 | 1996 | 1–2 | 33.3% | #561 | 1,499 | 0 | 0 |
| 26 | 2005 | 18–26 | 40.9% | #41 | 1,554 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 27 | 2006 | 15–26 | 36.6% | #78 | 1,538 | 0 | 0 | 1998 | 4–3 | 57.1% | #187 | 1,568 | 0 | 0 |
| 28 | 2007 | 2–9 | 18.2% | #194 | 1,609 | 0 | 0 | 1999 | 12–11 | 52.2% | #105 | 1,651 | 0 | 0 |
| 29 | 2008 | 5–7 | 41.7% | #69 | 1,689 | 0 | 0 | 2000 | 13–18 | 41.9% | #83 | 1,700 | 0 | 0 |
| 30 | 2009 | 14–28 | 33.3% | #86 | 1,610 | 0 | 0 | 2001 | 19–23 | 45.2% | #77 | 1,638 | 0 | 0 |
| 31 | 2010 | 0–10 | 0.0% | #249 | 1,551 | 0 | 0 | 2002 | 23–24 | 48.9% | #52 | 1,700 | 0 | 0 |
| 32 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2003 | 11–22 | 33.3% | #117 | 1,612 | 0 | 0 |
| 33 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2004 | 12–19 | 38.7% | #101 | 1,567 | 0 | 0 |
| 34 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2005 | 17–18 | 48.6% | #97 | 1,624 | 0 | 1 |
| 35 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2006 | 6–10 | 37.5% | #161 | 1,626 | 0 | 1 |
| 36 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2007 | 4–2 | 66.7% | #244 | 1,668 | 0 | 1 |